May 31, 2022, 08:14 AM
Outdoorguy1979New to sig
So I was wondering will a lower parts parts fit from a sig p320 fit in a sig p365 or is it different?
May 31, 2022, 08:16 AM
12131They share nothing in common.
June 02, 2022, 04:56 PM
NavyGuyquote:
Originally posted by Outdoorguy1979:
So I was wondering will a lower parts parts fit from a sig p320 fit in a sig p365 or is it different?
12131 pointed out no similarity P320 to P365, except the FCU which is the "gun"
June 04, 2022, 04:31 AM
tarheel7734quote:
Originally posted by NavyGuy:
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoorguy1979:
So I was wondering will a lower parts parts fit from a sig p320 fit in a sig p365 or is it different?
12131 pointed out no similarity P320 to P365, except the FCU which is the "gun"
the fcu's are different as wel,, or are you saying that they ate called a fire controlled unit?
June 04, 2022, 04:53 AM
92fstechConceptually, both guns are striker designs that incorporate a modular FCU as a serialized part that can be swapped between different grip modules, and mated to different uppers...within the same product line. That concept is where the similarity ends, however. The P365 is a much smaller gun than the P320, and there is no parts compatibility between the two product lines.
June 04, 2022, 07:52 AM
12131quote:
Originally posted by NavyGuy:
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoorguy1979:
So I was wondering will a lower parts parts fit from a sig p320 fit in a sig p365 or is it different?
12131 pointed out no similarity P320 to P365,
except the FCU which is the "gun"
Not sure what you mean by "except". Nothing in common means no "except".

June 04, 2022, 11:36 AM
NavyGuyquote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by NavyGuy:
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoorguy1979:
So I was wondering will a lower parts parts fit from a sig p320 fit in a sig p365 or is it different?
12131 pointed out no similarity P320 to P365,
except the FCU which is the "gun"
Not sure what you mean by "except". Nothing in common means no "except".
Ha. I guess that didn't come out right. I suppose I was trying to say FCU interchangeability in the 365 size, and 320 t0 320.