SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Rideout Arsenal Dragon- thoughts?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Rideout Arsenal Dragon- thoughts? Login/Join 
Smarter than the
average bear
posted
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KebCap8xoVo

That’s a link to a video about this pistol. Extremely low bore axis, modular, interesting design.

Link to company product page:

https://rideout-arsenal.mybigcommerce.com/dragonv1/
 
Posts: 3823 | Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana | Registered: June 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I ordered one last week. Should have it later this year and I can share thoughts. I like the design and the delayed blowback system it uses.
 
Posts: 1650 | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Ian at Forgotten Weapons has a much more detailed evaluation (description, complete takedown and shooting). Very interesting design and not boring same old same old. What strikes me when shoots it is that the muzzle flipped more than I expected for such a low-bore axis pistol.



Q






 
Posts: 30984 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Match division?
The dot is movable, you can rack the action with it but it does not reciprocate in firing.
I wonder if NROI has smelled it and come up with a ruling on whether it may be shot in Carry Optic.

Laugo had that problem, they were proud of their fixed optic base but had to come up with one on a moving part to pass as CO.
 
Posts: 3489 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Open class only, Jim
 
Posts: 1650 | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
What it looked like.
Pro: Easy installation of compensator.
Con: Availability of 30 shot nanner clips or long extensions.

I understand the rush to publication but it was tough to see Ian having to make excuses for malfunctions from his prototype.
 
Posts: 3489 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
Interesting design. The non-reciprocating "charging handle" on a handgun is a novel idea. I kind of agree with Ian, though...why add all that complexity to the design and not just make the optic base fixed and cycle the slide from the front?

I enjoyed the comparison to the Alien. And I agree with Q...it certainly did look like the muzzle flip was more pronounced with the Dragon than the Alien. I wonder if that has anything to do with all the reciprocating mass being out front and up high?


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11815 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Spread the Disease
Picture of flesheatingvirus
posted Hide Post
That was an awesome disassembly process.


________________________________________

-- Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past me I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. --
 
Posts: 18656 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: October 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Smarter than the
average bear
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the video Q; definitely more involved. I also agree about the muzzle flip. Intuitively it seems that such a low bore axis would “solve” that issue, but I suspect that the gun wants to “flip” one way or the other regardless, and up is the path of least resistance.

I’ve often thought that we’ve had very little truly innovative engineering on firearms, and this certainly is that. I just don’t know if it makes much difference for practical purposes.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: honestlou,
 
Posts: 3823 | Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana | Registered: June 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 92fstech:
Interesting design. The non-reciprocating "charging handle" on a handgun is a novel idea. I kind of agree with Ian, though...why add all that complexity to the design and not just make the optic base fixed and cycle the slide from the front?

I enjoyed the comparison to the Alien. And I agree with Q...it certainly did look like the muzzle flip was more pronounced with the Dragon than the Alien. I wonder if that has anything to do with all the reciprocating mass being out front and up high?


The Alien’s frame is steel, while the Dragon’s grip and frame are all aluminum. Probably a factor

This message has been edited. Last edited by: bac1023,
 
Posts: 1650 | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigs are
my Panacea...
Picture of billpocz
posted Hide Post
Thanks Q!

Very interesting from an engineering perspective!

Would be interesting to try this.




*
--- Sig 365, 365XL, 245, P6
*
 
Posts: 2038 | Location: Rural Northeastern KY | Registered: May 07, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Rideout Arsenal Dragon- thoughts?

© SIGforum 2026