Freethinker
| I literally thought that was some sort of spoof at first. The sight (no s) is interesting, but ported barrel? Nope.
► 6.4/93.6 ___________ “We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.” — George H. W. Bush |
| Posts: 47817 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002 |
IP
|
|
Oriental Redneck
| Definitely will replace the barrel, if I were to buy one. Everything else seems good.
Q
|
| |
Member
| Hmm... The tactical types won't like it because you can't do the "one-handed rack" in an emergency: the recessed slide lock can't be used as a release, and there is nothing protruding anywhere on the slide to engage a belt, holster edge, etc.
Still ... I kind of like it. |
| |
His diet consists of black coffee, and sarcasm.
| I had to watch the video on the SIG site to understand how that sight works. It seems to be an enhanced version of a "silhouette point." This is where you put the gun up in your line of sight and put the back of the gun's slide over the target. (The perfectly square and flat Glock slide lends itself very well to this.) This is an alternative (when for whatever reason you can't see or focus on your normal sights) technique recommended by the late Jim Cirillo in his book Guns, Bullets and Gunfights. At close range and in daylight (when I tried it), it does work quite well. A dot would give you a little better focus in low light. I could sort of see this and the other anti-snag features (but not the porting) if you were going to pocket carry this gun. For belt holster carry I think they are a SISOP. (Solution In Search of a Problem) Just lightly rounding sharp edges and corners is sufficient for that. |
| Posts: 28901 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012 |
IP
|
|
Oriental Redneck
| |
| |
Old Air Cavalryman
| Hmmm... my interest is piqued, especially with that rear sighting system. I wonder if these complete SAS slides will be offered later on?
"Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying who shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, here am I, send me."
|
| Posts: 7464 | Location: Georgia | Registered: February 19, 2005 |
IP
|
|
Member
| One could totally get rid of any snag by eliminating not only the front sight but also the entire gun to which that sight is attached.
Glad to see a gun company with a sense of humor. |
| |
Ammoholic
| quote: Originally posted by RogueJSK: [IMG]
No thanks.
Oh come on, it's like a really hard to quire red dot, what's not to love. I'm sure you'll line that bad boy up under stress. Just keep practicing that press out.
Jesse
Sic Semper Tyrannis |
| Posts: 21252 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014 |
IP
|
|
Oriental Redneck
| Beside the stupid ported barrel on this gun, can somebody explain to me what the hell those front slide serrations are for? Absolutely ridiculous for a SAS gun. Don't give me that press check bullshit, because you already have the LCI.
Q
|
| |
Member
| I love that they buried the sight in the slide, very cool. Would prefer no porting as well...
“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik Be harder to kill: https://preparefit.ck.page |
| |