E tan e epi tas

| P245 is similar to the P239 in that regard. It’s pretty crowded for big paws. If I think about when I am near mine and will take a more critical look to compare and get back to you. As an aside the P239 in .40 is an amazing little pistol.
Take Care, Shoot Safe, Chris
|
| Posts: 8323 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002 |  
IP
|
|
אַרְיֵה

| quote: Originally posted by FormerActionGuy:
I don't want to buy a 245 if it doesn't have enough grip length. I'm mainly concerned with the length of the front grip strap.
I have a P245, one of my favorite SIGs. It has been my most frequently carried pistol for the past few years. I usually carry it off-body, in a Wilderness SafePacker. I do have several of the P245 / P220c magazines, but when the pistol is not in a belt holster ([i]i.e.[i] in the SafePacker or on the nightstand), it is loaded with an eight round full size P220 magazine, using an X-Grip adapter, so the grip length is about the same as that of a full size P220. If you want to go this route, SIGforum member Greg Cote can probably supply you with the P220 magazines and X-Grip adapters.
הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים |
| Posts: 32470 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010 |  
IP
|
|
Page late and a dollar short
| I just sold my S-I-L a 1998 German manufactured P245. Estate sale, came into the store. First one I’ve seen in the wild for many years.
-------------------------------------—————— ————————--Ignorance is a powerful tool if applied at the right time, even, usually, surpassing knowledge(E.J.Potter, A.K.A. The Michigan Madman)
|
| Posts: 8795 | Location: Livingston County Michigan USA | Registered: August 11, 2002 |  
IP
|
|
Member

| I have both, they're close, but the 245 is a bit bigger, it's just a 220 cut down. The G10 grips transform the 245 even more than the 239.
"Ninja kick the damn rabbit" |
| Posts: 4676 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: October 11, 2008 |  
IP
|
|
Member
| Have both and in summer i carry the 239, Hogue chain link grips and a armory craft +1 mag adapter. it's gives it a little more room for purchase quote: Originally posted by FormerActionGuy: I recently picked up a really nice P239 SAS pistol on Gunbroker. I was the only person who bid on it and paid $405, quite a deal for a like new 239 in .40 S&W. Somewhat makes up for the times I've overpaid on other auctions...
The reason I am posting is because I have wanted to add a P245 to my collection for a while now. They seem to command a pretty serious price when they do become available. I have never handled one and have large hands, wear a size XL or sometimes even XXL gloves.
Can someone who has handled or owns both a P239 and P245 chime in on if they know which pistol has a longer grip? My hand barely fit the P239 and I don't want to buy a 245 if it doesn't have enough grip length. I'm mainly concerned with the length of the front grip strap.
As an aside, I purchased a set of Hogue G10 checkered grips which really transformed the handling of the P239 for me. First impressions after one range trip using the factory grips was that this pistol probably isn't for me. The Hogue grips are expensive but they made a big difference for me at least. Have a great weekend!
|
| |
Member

| Have both. 239 in .357. Carry the 245 most. Someone commented on the 6 round mag. Having carried a model 15 snub by for years. Perfectly happy with the 245. |
| |
E tan e epi tas

| |
| Posts: 8323 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002 |  
IP
|
|
E tan e epi tas

| quote: Dang Chris, you're right. Never would have thought that. Not that it's a significant amount, but the P239 just feels so much smaller.
Yeah I was really surprised. I always felt like they were “close” but felt like the P245 was certainly bigger. Like you said not significant but shockingly there is less room in that P245 grip. That P239 was my first serious carry gun. I always found it to be a fantastic pistol with my only issue being it’s the ONLY SIG I will occasionally ride the slide lock on. As for the grips I only did those for fun many many years later. I wish I had done them out of the gate. They transform the gun and make it even better and look great too.
Take Care, Shoot Safe, Chris
|
| Posts: 8323 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002 |  
IP
|
|
Resident Rogue and Blackguard

| Great comparison pics, Chris. I always thought that they were radically different in size. On a side note, the squared off front of the P239 grip always felt odd in my hand. I prefer the P225/P225A1 100x more...
Save the whales. Redeem them for valuable prizes...
|
| Posts: 1628 | Location: Missing New England everyday | Registered: March 14, 2005 |  
IP
|
|
Member

| The P245 is a great gun because, well... 45.
If you've got a P239 in .40, which by the way is a fantastic platform for that caliber, you're on your way to a superb set of options. Get a .357sig barrel and now you have two calibers with nothing more than a barrel swap.
Get a 9mm barrel, magazines and recoil spring and now you've got an inexpensive training caliber. Go one step further and get a threaded 9mm barrel, suppress it and enjoy the smile on your face when shooting that one.
As for the grip size, the P239 does feel a bit cramped for those of us with bigger hands. Find a Crimson Trace laser grip for it and it's a whole different world. Even if you don't need the laser option, the grip material, shape and size are about perfection for that gun. They are also less tacky than the large rubber Hogue's that are often used, so as a CCW gun, it won't grab your clothing as much. |
| Posts: 872 | Location: Alaska | Registered: April 29, 2015 |  
IP
|
|