SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Suppressed Weapons    ATF says it is removing the CLEO notification requirement from NFA registration forms
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
ATF says it is removing the CLEO notification requirement from NFA registration forms Login/Join 
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted
 
Posts: 7497 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
It’s about damned time. What a waste of paper, postage, and time for everyone involved.


______________________________________________
"If the truth shall kill them, let them die.”

Endeavoring to master the subtle art of the grapefruit spoon.
 
Posts: 18997 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Can any of our LEOs share any instances of departments changing policies, protocols, schedules, etc based on these CLEO notices? Has any department leader ever said “Well hell…looks like Bob just got four Ma Deuces. We should step up patrols in his area”?
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: February 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
Not here. Like smudge said, it's just a waste of time, postage, and paper. I was down on the indoor range one time at the Sheriff's department and the Sheriff (who was a gun collector himself) happened to walk in and when he saw me said he saw my letter come across his desk and asked what fun new toys I was getting, lol.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11803 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Creeping_Death:
Can any of our LEOs share any instances of departments changing policies, protocols, schedules, etc based on these CLEO notices? Has any department leader ever said “Well hell…looks like Bob just got four Ma Deuces. We should step up patrols in his area”?


Patrols for what? In case one of them gets loose and runs amuck in the neighborhood?

CLEO notifications were always dumb. In my old job, there were certain companies that wouldn’t transfer the item to the individual until after receipt of the notification by LEN.

There’s no state or federal regulations on retention of notification. So, they would get routed to me. I’d hold on to them for a month or so in case a company called. And then they met the shredder.

So it’s dumb.


________________
People hate you. Train like it.



 
Posts: 38468 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Spread the Disease
Picture of flesheatingvirus
posted Hide Post
Good. My first suppressor was on an individual Form 4 instead of my trust like all of my others. Since this and the tax are going bye-bye, I'm going to transfer it to my trust via another Form 4.


________________________________________

-- Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past me I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. --
 
Posts: 18647 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: October 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
For real?
Picture of Chowser
posted Hide Post
Haven't had any in the city I work for but I have submitted it to the chiefs in the cities I've lived in and run into them during continuing ed classes. The one time, one chief was like you don't have to keep sending me these things, I just throw them away. You have more suppressors and sbrs than my PD. lol



Not minority enough!
 
Posts: 8715 | Location: Cleveland, OH | Registered: August 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:
CLEO notifications were always dumb. In my old job, there were certain companies that wouldn’t transfer the item to the individual until after receipt of the notification by LEN.


Imagine what is was like walking into a rural Mississippi sheriff's department in the early 1980s and trying to get a country sheriff to fill out his portion of my application for a Colt M16a1 carbine. He thought I was nuts. Big Grin After 3 visits and a trip to the county attorneys office, he eventually filled it out.


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5536 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
Perhaps this is in the discussion and I’ve missed it or maybe it was something that changed before this most recent rule, but did the old “notice” requirement make it possible for the CLEO to refuse to allow the transfer?

That was my understanding at one time. Many years ago when I asked about an NFA item at a Colorado shop, I was told that the Denver chief of police wouldn’t approve any even though there were no legal restrictions at the time. Also, and although I didn’t need to worry about it where I lived later, a trust eliminated the notification requirement. Why the difference was never clear, but I just assumed it was in the category of “There’s no reason for it; it’s just policy.”




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
 
Posts: 49513 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Commirado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
Perhaps this is in the discussion and I’ve missed it or maybe it was something that changed before this most recent rule, but did the old “notice” requirement make it possible for the CLEO to refuse to allow the transfer?


Not under this old "notification" requirement, but they could under the even older "approval" requirement.

It was changed in 2016 to remove the requirement to obtain a CLEO approval signature, and changed to just CLEO notification.

And after a decade of just requiring notification, now they're dropping even the remaining notification part.
 
Posts: 35189 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
Thank you. Now I understand.




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
 
Posts: 49513 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Commirado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
Perhaps this is in the discussion and I’ve missed it or maybe it was something that changed before this most recent rule, but did the old “notice” requirement make it possible for the CLEO to refuse to allow the transfer?


Not under this old "notification" requirement, but they could under the even older "approval" requirement.

It was changed in 2016 to remove the requirement to obtain a CLEO approval signature, and changed to just CLEO notification.

And after a decade of just requiring notification, now they're dropping even the remaining notification part.


It was also one of the reasons dudes did the trust thing as I believe trusts were always notification only.
 
Posts: 5479 | Location: Iowa | Registered: February 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Suppressed Weapons    ATF says it is removing the CLEO notification requirement from NFA registration forms

© SIGforum 2026