SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Seattle’s minimum wage hike hurting low-level workers
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Seattle’s minimum wage hike hurting low-level workers Login/Join 
Member
Picture of nojoy
posted Hide Post
The income tax could eventually move to the surrounding cities like Bellevue, Renton, Kirkland, ext. King County sales tax jumped from 9.5% to 10% this April. Another good candidate for income tax.
 
Posts: 1293 | Location: Marysville, WA 98271 | Registered: March 18, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Striker in waiting
Picture of BurtonRW
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.


I'm sorry... not taking a position one way or the other on what, exactly?

Are you a Fucking Keynesian?? Confused

quote:
What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.


Exactly. And necessity is the mother of invention, my friend, or haven't you been paying attention?

Automation is the future.

-Rob




I predict that there will be many suggestions and statements about the law made here, and some of them will be spectacularly wrong. - jhe888

A=A
 
Posts: 16330 | Location: Maryland, AA Co. | Registered: March 16, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Out West:
Econ 101. However, progressives don't much care for proven theory or sciences in general.


They're are getting bitch slapped by the Invisible Hand.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21280 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
Everything these children do is based upon emotion. There's not one single adult among them.
 
Posts: 109785 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Am The Walrus
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nojoy:
The Seattle city council doesn't care. Agenda accomplished. We also have a devout socialist in the city council too. A real wack job.
As mentioned on an earlier post, things like food and rent are going up. Everybody wants that extra money. Which means at the end of the day, no realized pay raise at all. The council did this partly to keep themselves at their current positions longer.
Now the latest idea is an income tax for those that work in the city of Seattle making more than $200,000 a year. If passed, they could eventually go after everyone.


Class warfare at its finest there. Marx would've been proud.

Come election time, these loons tout about how they got people raises, how they helped the poor. Businesses close and move away and the loons blame the businesses. The emotionally driven idiots believe the loons and keep voting them in.

What a vicious cycle.


_____________

 
Posts: 13345 | Registered: March 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Now the latest idea is an income tax for those that work in the city of Seattle making more than $200,000 a year. If passed, they could eventually go after everyone.

Class warfare at its finest there. Marx would've been proud.

Come election time, these loons tout about how they got people raises, how they helped the poor. Businesses close and move away and the loons blame the businesses. The emotionally driven idiots believe the loons and keep voting them in.


The City earnings tax is what killed the City of St. Louis. All the businesses and most people with a decent income moved out of the City. You can clearly see it on the graph below. The City earnings tax was begun in 1950, the population immediately began to decline.



Now, after 67 years of failure and decreasing population, the City of St. Louis has a new brilliant idea: They want to be "re-admitted" or merge with the County.

The Democrats have destroyed the City, now they want to take down the entire County.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24780 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mikeyspizza
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BurtonRW:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.


I'm sorry... not taking a position one way or the other on what, exactly?

Are you a Fucking Keynesian?? Confused

quote:
What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.


Exactly. And necessity is the mother of invention, my friend, or haven't you been paying attention?

Automation is the future.

-Rob
I have a BA in Econ and believe in free market capitalism, and the Seattle result is the knee-jerk result I expected.

The WaPo article I linked gives more information on complications in the Seattle area, and that this study/paper has not yet been peer-reviewed (meaning conclusions could possibly be revised).

What I meant by the Subway example is that if a store is already staffed to the minimum (2 employees), then they can't reduce employment any further, so until they can automate further, then the 2 employees they need to run the store will benefit from the higher wage (unless the owner decides it's beneficial to close).

The subject has and continues to be studied to death, and each side can and will continue to point to results that support their point of view.
 
Posts: 4082 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: August 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
This century is going to be interesting, automation can/will remove the need for as many employees. This is part of the reason for people believing socialism is our destiny. Socialism is not the answer, history has shown eventually a strongman will put you in bondage.

Humans need not apply, short video on the subject.
 
Posts: 441 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
It really doesn't matter one bit in the long run how much the minimum wage is, because it is still the MINIMUM wage and if you're making it, you're an UNSKILLED worker.

Either thru automation, job loss, inflation or whatever, you'll still lose. In the end, if you want to make a better life, you're just going to have to pick up skillz. There's just no way around it.
 
Posts: 1814 | Location: Austin TX | Registered: October 30, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Sailor1911
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
quote:
Originally posted by BurtonRW:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.


I'm sorry... not taking a position one way or the other on what, exactly?

Are you a Fucking Keynesian?? Confused

quote:
What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.


Exactly. And necessity is the mother of invention, my friend, or haven't you been paying attention?

Automation is the future.

-Rob
I have a BA in Econ and believe in free market capitalism, and the Seattle result is the knee-jerk result I expected.

The WaPo article I linked gives more information on complications in the Seattle area, and that this study/paper has not yet been peer-reviewed (meaning conclusions could possibly be revised).

What I meant by the Subway example is that if a store is already staffed to the minimum (2 employees), then they can't reduce employment any further, so until they can automate further, then the 2 employees they need to run the store will benefit from the higher wage (unless the owner decides it's beneficial to close).

The subject has and continues to be studied to death, and each side can and will continue to point to results that support their point of view.


But, in your Subway example, what decision will the business owner make on placement of his next unit? The question of, "And then what happens?" is never on thee minds of the politicians that see these laws as beneficial.




Place your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.

“If in winning a race, you lose the respect of your fellow competitors, then you have won nothing” - Paul Elvstrom "The Great Dane" 1928 - 2016
 
Posts: 3805 | Location: Wichita, Kansas | Registered: March 27, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Sailor1911
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sailor1911:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
quote:
Originally posted by BurtonRW:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.


I'm sorry... not taking a position one way or the other on what, exactly?

Are you a Fucking Keynesian?? Confused

quote:
What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.


Exactly. And necessity is the mother of invention, my friend, or haven't you been paying attention?

Automation is the future.

-Rob
I have a BA in Econ and believe in free market capitalism, and the Seattle result is the knee-jerk result I expected.

The WaPo article I linked gives more information on complications in the Seattle area, and that this study/paper has not yet been peer-reviewed (meaning conclusions could possibly be revised).

What I meant by the Subway example is that if a store is already staffed to the minimum (2 employees), then they can't reduce employment any further, so until they can automate further, then the 2 employees they need to run the store will benefit from the higher wage (unless the owner decides it's beneficial to close).

The subject has and continues to be studied to death, and each side can and will continue to point to results that support their point of view.


But, in your Subway example, what decision will the business owner make on placement of his next unit? The question of, "And then what happens?" is never on the minds of the politicians that see these laws as beneficial.




Place your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.

“If in winning a race, you lose the respect of your fellow competitors, then you have won nothing” - Paul Elvstrom "The Great Dane" 1928 - 2016
 
Posts: 3805 | Location: Wichita, Kansas | Registered: March 27, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
But everyone deserves a livable wage!

Seriously, I just had this conversation with a liberal the other day. His argument was that not everyone has the skill or intelligence to have a job that pays more than minimum wage. I replied that the world needs ditch diggers too. And just because you're stupid or lazy doesn't give you the right to live in places like NYC or Seattle. When those places decide that they want more "ditch diggers" then they'll start paying more for those jobs. But arbitrarily mandating a minimum wage will always lead to what we're seeing in Seattle.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 31139 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sailor1911:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
quote:
Originally posted by BurtonRW:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.


I'm sorry... not taking a position one way or the other on what, exactly?

Are you a Fucking Keynesian?? Confused

quote:
What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.


Exactly. And necessity is the mother of invention, my friend, or haven't you been paying attention?

Automation is the future.

-Rob
I have a BA in Econ and believe in free market capitalism, and the Seattle result is the knee-jerk result I expected.

The WaPo article I linked gives more information on complications in the Seattle area, and that this study/paper has not yet been peer-reviewed (meaning conclusions could possibly be revised).

What I meant by the Subway example is that if a store is already staffed to the minimum (2 employees), then they can't reduce employment any further, so until they can automate further, then the 2 employees they need to run the store will benefit from the higher wage (unless the owner decides it's beneficial to close).

The subject has and continues to be studied to death, and each side can and will continue to point to results that support their point of view.


But, in your Subway example, what decision will the business owner make on placement of his next unit? The question of, "And then what happens?" is never on thee minds of the politicians that see these laws as beneficial.
Look, we could each throw around credentials and degrees all day, but in the end its all irrelevant. There are natural laws of nature that exist on this planet, and simple economics is one of them. Governments can try to bastardize and manipulate the inputs and outputs of a system in pursuit of a desire outcome, but the reality is, no one can escape simple economics forever. Seattle and a number of these others cities are learning that fact first hand. Whether it is neither here nor there.

Trying to cheat basic economics is like trying to cause water to run up hill. No matter how much time, effort, and money you throw at the process, it will eventually fail. And refusing to recognize the reason why, doesn't change the outcome.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
I have a degree in economics but am not taking a position one way or the other.

What I do know is that is takes at least X number of people to operate, for example, a Subway restaurant at any point in time, regardless of what the wage is. So until they can reduce or eliminate the need for X number of human workers, either Subway prices will have to rise, or the profits will decline and the store will close as the owner/operator seeks a better return on his/her capital.

So, in your analysis there are two alternatives:

1) Prices rise, consumption drops, lower demand for labor, or
2) Store closes, lower demand for labor

Hmmmm....coin flip:
heads: lower demand for labor or
tails, lower demand for labor.

Sorry, that sounds awfully lot like a position, to me. Smile

Just messing with you. I agree completely. Raising the price by fiat above market-clearing price can do nothing but decrease demand, relative to the market clearing value.
 
Posts: 15219 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ChuckWall
posted Hide Post
Poor dumbasses don't realize that the real minimum wage is $0.


*************
MAGA
 
Posts: 5689 | Registered: February 20, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Corgis Rock
Picture of Icabod
posted Hide Post
But Wait! There's another study that says things are fine!
It's from Berkeley

"To review, the timeline seems to have gone like this: The UW shares with City Hall an early draft of its study showing the minimum wage law is hurting the workers it was meant to help; the mayor’s office shares the study with researchers known to be sympathetic toward minimum wage laws, asking for feedback; those researchers release a report that’s high on Seattle’s minimum wage law just a week before the negative report comes out."

It's been pointed out that the researchers and $15 advocates have been working closely together.

"In other words, if you don’t like an unflattering study from a team of researchers from the local university that accurately exposes some of the negative employment effects of the city of Seattle’s $15 minimum wage, you shop around – out of state in this case — for a more favorable study of that questionable and risky public policy experiment."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/t...hought/#1478f24231ba



“ The work of destruction is quick, easy and exhilarating; the work of creation is slow, laborious and dull.
 
Posts: 6066 | Location: Outside Seattle | Registered: November 29, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
Putin nuke us please.
 
Posts: 10070 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Icabod:
But Wait! There's another study that says things are fine!
It's from Berkeley

You don't say. Wink
 
Posts: 15219 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No double standards
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by joel9507:
quote:
Originally posted by Icabod:
But Wait! There's another study that says things are fine!
It's from Berkeley

You don't say. Wink


My stat prof would often comment "many people use statistical studies they way a drunk uses a light post, to prop up their position rather than for the light they might provide". Let me know what you want to "prove" and I can find (or craft) a study that supports you.




"Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women. When it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it....While it lies there, it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it"
- Judge Learned Hand, May 1944
 
Posts: 30668 | Location: UT | Registered: November 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Conservative Behind
Enemy Lines
Picture of synthplayer
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 10930 | Registered: June 06, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Seattle’s minimum wage hike hurting low-level workers

© SIGforum 2024