SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Guy Buys Tank off eBay, Finds Gold Bullion in Fuel Tank
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Guy Buys Tank off eBay, Finds Gold Bullion in Fuel Tank Login/Join 
Member
Picture of mikeyspizza
posted Hide Post
Since there's been no news updates in 5 years, guess he's SOL. Should have kept his mouth shut and melted it down in small amounts and either stored it or sell to "we buy gold" places.
 
Posts: 4015 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: August 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIG's 'n Surefires
Picture of M-11
posted Hide Post
Call Dave Truong?



"Common sense is wisdom with its sleeves rolled up." -Kyle Farnsworth
"Freedom of Speech does not guarantee freedom from consequences." -Mike Rowe
"Democracies aren't overthrown, they're given away." -George Lucas
 
Posts: 6880 | Location: IL, due south of the Arch | Registered: April 20, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
First thing to do would be to tell nobody. Otherwise you'll likely loose it just like what probably happened with this guy. This is an older story, and I haven't seen any updates.

He's right. You can't just walk down the street with a huge gold bar and sell it without raising some questions. You could however buy yourself a torch, melt it into smaller amounts, and send it to refineries all over the world without a single question being raised.

Just pay the taxes on your new income, and you're good to go.


Bingo. You bought it, and all contents, as-is. That means complete with that funny smell in the interior, the stains in the seats, and the gold bars in the gas tank.

quote:
Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
OK. Good plan, but who owns the bullion? I don't store my gold in a gas tank. There is an owner somewhere.


Sure was, and he found his new gold bars in the gas tank of his new used tank. Now the police own the gold bars. Pretty straightforward stuff, to my mind.


______________________________________________
Carthago delenda est
 
Posts: 17215 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
If the person he bought the tank from owned the gold, then the argument would be that ownership transferred to the purchaser. More likely, however, whoever put the gold in the tank wasn’t the owner and therefore the gold would legally belong to whomever it was stolen from. Legitimate ownership of stolen property doesn’t transfer to the thief.


"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves."


We see what you did there Cool


Bill Gullette
 
Posts: 1529 | Location: Behind the Pine Curtain  | Registered: March 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Am The Walrus
posted Hide Post


_____________

 
Posts: 13147 | Registered: March 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 4MUL8R:
What a complete idiot. Kiss that bullion goodbye.


Yes, what a dumb ass. He could've cut it down, melted it into smaller pieces or whatever.
 
Posts: 21335 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
quote:
OK. Good plan, but who owns the bullion?


The guy who bought it in the tank. Unless noted otherwise, generally when a person buys something they own everything within.

Who owned the diesel fuel inside the tank? The same person that owned the gold inside the same tank.


This was in Great Britain, of course. I don't know what the law is there.

It isn't unreasonable to assume the gold was stolen. Under Anglo-American common law, stealing does not transfer ownership (even to a later, innocent purchaser), so if it was stolen, the original owner is still the owner.

Here's a hypothetical for you: Your SIG220 is stolen by some thug. Thuggy keeps it in is car, hidden. Later, the police seize the car, but don't find your P220. They sell the car to some guy at an auction. Is it his gun now? (Under the law, no, it is not, it is still yours.)

Now, when determining who that owner is is impossible, some other rule will apply, and I have no idea what that rule is in Great Britain.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53122 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
Maybe if the gold was stolen in the UK by the previous tank owner I'd agree.

Using your example, let's say my Sig is stolen and hidden in car. Car is later seized and auctioned. Buyer exports car to Mexico. Mexican sells it to a guy in Guatemala who then finds the gun.

I'd say that the Guatemalan is now the proud owner of a Sig.

As far as a US example, I had a customer that owned an artifact from NASA. It was purchased from a woman who purchased it at a Marshal's sale when the guy in possession was sent to prison for stealing/counterfeiting space artifacts.

Woman sent bag to NASA to authenticate, and NASA seized it saying it belonged to them. The guy in prison stole it from a museum who had it on loan from NASA.

Judge said she owned it. Government sold it, as is. She purchased stolen item in good faith.
Flipped her sub $1000 purchase into $2,000,000 if I recall. Then she went after NASA again for damaging it while in their custody, diminishing its value.

In this case it was likely one government involved in war, either seizing assets of others or hiding their own. Like in the above case, if the government can't keep track of it's own items and those items are later sold, too bad for the government. This wasn't some guy knocking off the local pawn shop and hiding the jewelry in his car.


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 15729 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Its why you always need a guy.

Granite Guy
Plumbing Guy
Electrical Guy
Transmission Guy
Gold Smelting Guy.

 
Posts: 23575 | Location: Florida | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
Maybe if the gold was stolen in the UK by the previous tank owner I'd agree.

Using your example, let's say my Sig is stolen and hidden in car. Car is later seized and auctioned. Buyer exports car to Mexico. Mexican sells it to a guy in Guatemala who then finds the gun.

I'd say that the Guatemalan is now the proud owner of a Sig.

As far as a US example, I had a customer that owned an artifact from NASA. It was purchased from a woman who purchased it at a Marshal's sale when the guy in possession was sent to prison for stealing/counterfeiting space artifacts.

Woman sent bag to NASA to authenticate, and NASA seized it saying it belonged to them. The guy in prison stole it from a museum who had it on loan from NASA.

Judge said she owned it. Government sold it, as is. She purchased stolen item in good faith.
Flipped her sub $1000 purchase into $2,000,000 if I recall. Then she went after NASA again for damaging it while in their custody, diminishing its value.

In this case it was likely one government involved in war, either seizing assets of others or hiding their own. Like in the above case, if the government can't keep track of it's own items and those items are later sold, too bad for the government. This wasn't some guy knocking off the local pawn shop and hiding the jewelry in his car.


Yeah, but the government was the owner (in the form of NASA), which then sold that artifact to your customer (via the US Marshals). The government (the owner) had gotten it back. The owner sold it, which wiped out everything that happened in the meantime.

Your Guatemala example is counter to traditional principles of Anglo-American law. It doesn't matter where it is stolen, found, or sold. But, as I said, the example at issue is in Great Britain, and I don't know what their current law is on this.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53122 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Pyker
posted Hide Post
Their law is the same as here. You cannot reduce stolen property to lawfully owned property simply by buying it in good faith. It must be, if practicable, be returned to the last lawful owner. If this is not possible, as in the owner cannot be traced, in some cases where there is no suspicion of it being obtained by crime, it will be returned to the finder, but in other cases, it will be dealt with by a court who will decide who should possess it.
 
Posts: 2763 | Location: Lake Country, Minnesota | Registered: September 06, 2019Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
Finders keepers.

It'd be interesting to know whether the bars are identifiable via serial number or something. If not, it wouldn't be like a stolen gun where ownership can be proven. Any schmuck could say, "Oh, um, yeah...those are mine!".


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 20130 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Guy Buys Tank off eBay, Finds Gold Bullion in Fuel Tank

© SIGforum 2024