quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:

quote:

Originally posted by braillediver:
Don Kings introduction was amazing and Not what I expected. Really nice and lots of enthusiasm.

Don King is, always has been and always will be a dirt bag ass clown.
His support for Trump does not change my opinion of him one bit.

Dirt bag ass clowns vote too, maybe he can influence some of them.

quote:

Dirt bag ass clowns vote too, maybe he can influence some of them.

^^^^^^
Love this! On target.

quote:

Originally posted by Tonyny:
Atlanta star Brian Tyree Henry: if Trump gets elected 'it's going to be Mad Max'
“You can put Trump in the White House, but you need to prepare for a revolt because I’m going nuts,” says Henry, as he waits for his English breakfast"


“It’s going to be Escape From New York in here and you might as well call me Kurt Russell because I’m going to be ****ing people up. It’s going to be Mad Max.”

They're beginning to take the possibility of a Trump victory seriously.

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:

quote:

Originally posted by braillediver:
Don Kings introduction was amazing and Not what I expected. Really nice and lots of enthusiasm.

Don King is, always has been and always will be a dirt bag ass clown.
His support for Trump does not change my opinion of him one bit.

Despite theatrics, Don King is a very smart guy. And a staunch conservative.

A trump endorsement from Farrakhan?

http://www.breitbart.com/video...d-inner-city-blacks/

Sunday at the Men’s Day program hosted at Union Temple Baptist Church in Washington, DC, Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan said to President Barack Obama, “Your people are suffering and dying in the streets,” of Chicago, so “you failed to do what should have been done.” Farrakhan continued by saying it is time to let Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump do “what he wants to because he is not destroying your legacy.” Farrakhan said, “So you Democrats, you been in their party a long time. Answer me, what did you get? You got a president. He is worried about his legacy. You want Hillary to get in to protect your legacy because Trump said the minute he gets in, he is going to reverse the Affordable Care Act. Because that is your signature achievement. To show you how hateful the enemy is, he hates that you achieve what you did achieve. So he said I’m going to tear it up when I get in. So he don’t want his legacy destroyed. Mr. President, let the man do, if he get in, what he wants to because he is not destroying your legacy. If your legacy is bound up in an Affordable Care Act that only affects a few million people and they are trying to make it really difficult for those of us who signed up, that’s not your legacy. He continued, “But I just want to tell you, Mr. President, you’re from Chicago, and so am I. I go out in the streets with the people. I visited the worst neighborhoods. I talked to the gangs. And while I was out there talking to them, they said ‘You know, Farrakhan, the president ain’t never come. Could you get him to come and look after us?’ There’s your legacy, Mr. President. It’s in the streets with your suffering people, Mr. President. And If you can’t go and see about them, then don’t worry about your legacy ’cause the white people that you served so well, they’ll preserve your legacy. The hell they will. But you didn’t earn your legacy with us. We put you there. You fought for the rights of gay people. You fought for the rights of this people and that people. You fight for Israel. Your people are suffering and dying in the streets! That’s where your legacy is. Now you failed to do what should have been done.”

Can't tell if this is an endorsement or not. It's definitely a big middle finger.

Tony.

Ramblings of a brain infected by hate and syphillis.

But, then Calypso always seems, to many, to be a mishmash of words.

quote:

Originally posted by benny6:
Can't tell if this is an endorsement or not. It's definitely a big middle finger.

The video reminds me of Bluto's speech rallying the frat towards the end of Animal House; "...forget it, he's rollin'"



Louie, some of it made some sense...

Why did Clinton do this ? Does she think this is effective for her ?

video at:

http://redalertpolitics.com/20...olled-instead-video/

Hillary tries to look cool on “Between Two Ferns” — gets trolled instead [VIDEO]

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

quote:

Originally posted by braillediver:
Hard to say whether that political cartoon is sarcasm or not

It’s not hard to guess if we look at the cartoonist’s other works: He’s an antigun leftist who in the above cartoon is ridiculing Trump and his supporters as mindless aggressive (and in the case of the women, mindlessly compliant) Neandertals.

Had I known about that asshole I would never posted that image. Deleted

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Why did Clinton do this ? Does she think this is effective for her ?

video at:

http://redalertpolitics.com/20...olled-instead-video/

Hillary tries to look cool on “Between Two Ferns” — gets trolled instead [VIDEO]

"Does Obama like his coffee like himself...... weak?"

Win or lose, Trump has the respect and admiration of many of us here-- something he did not start out with. At all.

He exposed the Uniparty, and showed the world that the "main stream media" are a central cog in that corrupt machine. He exposed the whole Bush clan for the selfish elitists they are. He dealt with PC exactly the way it needs to be dealt with, he gave it the finger. He did something no politician ever had the balls to do, he took on the Clinton Crime Family head on, no holds barred. (We never saw Hillary collapse in a quivering heap before. I wonder why now?)

And I think the son of a bitch is going to win.

quote:

Originally posted by benny6:
A trump endorsement from Farrakhan?

{text of Farrakhan statement}

Hello guys. OK, I've received my 6th email from fellow members who say you miss my insight into what's going on.

I'm spending a lot of time in political forums and will mostly be there until the election. I'll stop here occasionally between now and November 8th.

OK, here's the update. When you get down to the roots and ignore the fluff, this election is about winning the Electoral College. As we sit today, Clinton has a helluva lot easier path to 270 than does Trump.

For The Donald to win, he MUST carry Ohio, North Carolina and Florida. Lose one and the election is over. Fortunately, as of now, Trump likely will win all three.

Even that, however, doesn't get him to 270. He must also win any 2 of Nevada, Colorado, and New Hampshire. If he doesn't win any 2 of these, he still loses. If the election were today, I think he would win NV and CO but lose NH. That would be ok.

All of the above is as of today. So very much could change in the next 48 days. If there is reason for hope, it does seem as though all of the states that are currently being counted in Trump's column will stay there. There are a few states being counted for Hillary that could switch before 11/8. There are also 3 "tie" states that are currently trending towards Trump (he must win all 3 to have a chance.)

OK, there you go. I'll stop in again after the big "debate" on Monday (which, of course, is a debate in name only.)

terrible to follow a serious post . . . .

Is it just me, though?



The Clinton side of the picture was posted as her shouting: "‘Why Aren’t I 50 Points Ahead’ of Donald Trump?"

Here is the video showing her browbeating her "supporters." Somehow, it even sounds like Ack, Ack . . . Ack, Ack, Ack.



I'm hoping Trump can yodel.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tubetone,

^^^^^ all i heard was fingernails on a chalk board.

quote:

Originally posted by gw3971:
^^^^^ all i heard was fingernails on a chalk board.

Ugh. I managed 30 seconds of that. I fear I may have caused some permanent damage to myself.

Maybe Slim Whitman's "Indian Love Call." will be the bumper music for the debate Monday night.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:
Maybe Slim Whitman's "Indian Love Call." will be the bumper music for the debate Monday night.

Then you would get Elizabeth Warren crashing the party!

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Why did Clinton do this ? Does she think this is effective for her ?

video at:

http://redalertpolitics.com/20...olled-instead-video/

Hillary tries to look cool on “Between Two Ferns” — gets trolled instead [VIDEO]

As much as I loathe both those individuals I thought parts of it were actually pretty funny. Don't think it will help her, but probably won't hurt her either.

How Trump wins the debate

On one of my first trips to New Hampshire in 1991, to challenge President George H.W. Bush, I ran into Sen. Eugene McCarthy.

He was returning to the scene of his ’68 triumph, when he had inflicted the first crippling wound on Lyndon Johnson.

“Pat, you don’t have to win up here, you know,” he assured me. “All you have to do is beat the point spread.”

“Beat the point spread” is a good description of what Donald Trump has to do in Monday night’s debate.

With only a year in national politics, he does not have to show a mastery of foreign and domestic policy details. Rather, he has to do what John F. Kennedy did in 1960 and what Ronald Reagan did in 1980.

He has to meet and exceed expectations, which are not terribly high. He has to convince a plurality of voters, who seem prepared to vote for him, that he’s not a terrible risk and that he will be a president of whom they can be proud.

He has to show the country a Trump that contradicts the caricature created by those who dominate our politics, culture and press.

The Trump on stage at Hofstra University will have 90 minutes to show that the malicious cartoon of Donald Trump is a libelous lie.

He can do it, for he did it at the Mexico City press conference with President Pena Nieto where he surprised his allies and stunned his adversaries.

Recall. Kennedy and Reagan, too, came into their debates with a crucial slice of the electorate undecided but ready to vote for them if each could relieve the voters’ anxieties about his being within reach of the button to launch a nuclear war.

Kennedy won the first debate, not because he offered more convincing arguments or more details on the issues, but because he appeared more lucid, likable and charismatic, more mature than folks had thought. And he seemed to point to a brighter, more challenging future for which the country was prepared after Ike.

After that first debate, Americans could see JFK sitting in the Oval Office.

Reagan won his debate with Carter because his sunny disposition and demeanor and his “There you go again!” airy dismissal of Carter’s nitpicking contradicted the malevolent media-created caricatures of the Gipper as a dangerous primitive or an amiable dunce.

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

Even George W. Bush, who, according to most judges, did not win a single debate against Al Gore or John Kerry, came off as a levelheaded fellow who was more relatable than the inventor of the Internet or the windsurfer of Cape Cod.

The winner of presidential debates is not the one who compiles the most debating points. It is the one whom the audience decides they like, and can be comfortable taking a chance on.

Trump has the same imperative and same opportunity as JFK and Reagan. For the anticipated audience, of Super Bowl size, will be there to see him, not her. He is the challenger who fills up the sports arenas with the tens and scores of thousands, not Hillary Clinton.

If she were debating John Kasich or Jeb Bush, neither the viewing audience nor the title-fight excitement of Monday night would be there. Specifically, what does Trump need to do? He needs to show that he can be presidential. He needs to speak with confidence, but not cockiness, and to deal with Clinton’s attacks directly, but with dignity and not disrespect. And humor always helps.

Clinton has a more difficult assignment.

America knows she knows the issues. But two-thirds of the country does not believe her to be honest or trustworthy. As her small crowds show, she sets no one on fire. Blacks, Hispanics and millennials who invested high hopes in Barack Obama seem to have no great hopes for her. She has no bold agenda, no New Deal or New Frontier.

“Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” wailed Hillary Clinton this week.

The answer is simple. America has seen enough of her and has no great desire to see any more; and she cannot change an impression hardened over 25 years – in 90 minutes.

But the country will accept her, if the only alternative is the Trump of the mainstream media’s portrayal. Hence, the strategy of the Democratic Party for the next seven weeks is obvious:

Trash Trump, take him down, make him intolerable, and we win.

No matter how she performs though, Donald Trump can win the debate, for he is the one over whom the question marks hang. But he is also the one who can dissipate and destroy them with a presidential performance.

In that sense, this debate and this election are Trump’s to win.