SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year IV
Page 1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 1307
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Trump Presidency : Year IV Login/Join 
Member
Picture of erj_pilot
posted Hide Post
Again...I have to wonder. I thought racism ended the day Nikki Haley made a YUUUGE display and ordered the removal of the Confederate Flag from the State Capital. I remember there was a ceremony and everything......



"If you’re a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too…” – MAJ Richard D. Winters (1918-2011), E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil... Therefore, as tongues of fire lick up straw and as dry grass sinks down in the flames, so their roots will decay and their flowers blow away like dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the word of the Holy One of Israel." - Isaiah 5:20,24
 
Posts: 11066 | Location: NW Houston | Registered: April 04, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhtagmember:
John Roberts needs to be removed

I don't care how, but he needs to be removed as he's no longer serving the country

The President and the Senate put him there, they can figure out how to remove him - the fact that a procedure 'doesn't exist' is just a mere technicality for someone like Roberts

... And he proves it once again today.

This is the third time this month Chief Justice Roberts has sided with the liberals of the court on a hot-button social issue (protecting DREAMers, upholding LGBTQ employment rights, and now striking down state abortion restrictions).

In response to Chief Justice John Roberts siding with liberal judges on the Louisiana abortion ruling - Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio tweets: "What’s next, Chief Justice Roberts? Our Second Amendment rights?"

Roberts flipped.

He was on the opposite side of this same question in a 2016 case:

Roberts had been on the dissenting side of the 2016 case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. While the law in contention in the case June v. Gee was nearly identical to the Texas law, Roberts based his decision on court precedent rather than his own opinion of the law.

While he maintained that he still disagrees with the Texas law and the court's 2016 ruling, he wrote Monday that"the question today" is on "whether to adhere to [the 2016 case] in deciding the present case."

The Louisiana law in dispute was similar to a Texas law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges that was reviewed by the Supreme Court, in a different configuration of justices, in the 2016 case Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. The Texas law then was deemed unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling meant that the restriction placed an undue burden on women’s access to abortions.

https://www.washingtonexaminer...rts-joining-liberals

As an aside, a "John Roberts" is listed twice in the Epstein flight logs.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: chellim1,



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24868 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:

... And he proves it once again today.


Roberts is a cancer.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 31169 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:

... And he proves it once again today.


Roberts is a cancer.


The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
Roberts essentially became the new Anthony Kennedy, the new "swing vote" of the court. Like Kennedy, who was appointed by Reagan, Roberts has quickly become the left's Fifth Vote. And like Kennedy, he has become an activist judge like the other four leftists. Roberts will never leave or be replaced soo. Ginsburg and Breyer are the keys for the near future of the court.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17568 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.

Yes... and Roberts was on the opposite side of this same question in the 2016 case.
He voted to overturn the Louisiana case just because of the previous decision, even though he thought it was wrong and voted to uphold the Texas law in 2016. By that logic the Dred Scott case never would have been overturned.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24868 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Velvet Voicebox
posted Hide Post
Joey D
6/29/20

No description provided




"All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope."

--Sir Winston Churchill

"The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose."

--James Earl Jones



 
Posts: 7674 | Location: KCMO | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lighten up and laugh
Picture of Ackks
posted Hide Post
Looks like Reddit is openly going against him too from the story on Liberty Daily. This is what happens when he is in office. Unreal.
 
Posts: 7934 | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
quote:
The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.

Yes... and Roberts was on the opposite side of this same question in the 2016 case.
He voted to overturn the Louisiana case just because of the previous decision, even though he thought it was wrong and voted to uphold the Texas law in 2016. By that logic the Dred Scott case never would have been overturned.


Or prohibition. Wink






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
quote:
The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.

Yes... and Roberts was on the opposite side of this same question in the 2016 case.
I'm really starting to wonder if Roberts hasn't just decided to vote to screw all of us 'and' Trump as often as possible, jurisprudence be damned. RBG has been exactly who we always thought she was her entire career. Roberts appears to be 'coming out' and showing us exactly who he's always been. The man disgusts me.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Keystoner
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oddball:
Ginsburg and Breyer are the keys for the near future of the court.

Ginsburg can die tomorrow--Trump won't be able to replace her in this term--Garland set the precedent. We need to reelect Trump.



Year V
 
Posts: 2693 | Registered: November 05, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lighten up and laugh
Picture of Ackks
posted Hide Post
quote:
https://thehill.com/homenews/c...-over-mail-in-voting


President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing Pennsylvania's secretary of state and 67 county election boards in an effort to change how mail-in ballots are sent and counted.

The federal lawsuit was filed in Pittsburgh on Monday by the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, and four Pennsylvania Republican members of Congress: Glen Thompson, Mike Kelly, John Joyce and Guy Reschenthaler.

“To be free and fair, elections must be transparent and verifiable. Yet, Defendants have inexplicably chosen a path that jeopardizes election security and will lead -and has already led - to the disenfranchisement of voters, questions about the accuracy of election results, and ultimately chaos heading into the upcoming November 3, 2020 General Election,” the lawsuit reads.

The suit claims the issues are a “direct result” of Pennsylvania’s “hazardous hurried, and illegal implementation of unmonitored mail-in voting” that the Trump campaign and Republicans claim can lead to fraud and “chaos.”

A spokesperson for Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, said the department will not comment on pending litigation.

Pennsylvania passed a law last year that expanded mail-in ballot voting options to allow anyone to vote by mail without providing a reason.

The lawsuit argues, however, that during the June 2 primary voters used procedures that were not outlined in the new law including submitting absentee and mail-in ballots at locations such as shopping centers, parking lots, fairgrounds, parks, retirement homes, college campuses, fire halls, municipal government buildings and elected official’s offices.

The suit also says that this was done with “the knowledge, consent and/or approval of the Secretary of the Commonwealth.”

The Trump campaign and Republicans are seeking an order that would prohibit Pennsylvania from permitting absentee and mail-in ballots to be returned to locations other than the offices of the county boards of elections.

They’re also seeking an order that bars the county election board from counting absentee and mail-in ballots that “lack a secrecy envelope” or have any text or symbols on envelopes revealing the elector's identity, party affiliation or candidate preference.

 
Posts: 7934 | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Keystoner:
quote:
Originally posted by oddball:
Ginsburg and Breyer are the keys for the near future of the court.

Ginsburg can die tomorrow--Trump won't be able to replace her in this term--Garland set the precedent. We need to reelect Trump.
Bologna. McConnell has already stated he'll ram a nomination through, as well he should. If that opportunity presents itself and Repubs don't take advantage of it, they're actually dumber than I think they are.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Keystoner:

Ginsburg can die tomorrow--Trump won't be able to replace her in this term--.


Sure he can. And he will.

quote:
We need to reelect Trump.


That's a fact.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 31169 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bigdeal:
If that opportunity presents itself and Repubs don't take advantage of it, they're actually dumber than I think they're Toast.

Time for the scorched earth approach or else.


____________________________________________________

The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart.
 
Posts: 13523 | Location: Bottom of Lake Washington | Registered: March 06, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Keystoner:
quote:
Originally posted by oddball:
Ginsburg and Breyer are the keys for the near future of the court.

Ginsburg can die tomorrow--Trump won't be able to replace her in this term--Garland set the precedent. We need to reelect Trump.

BULLSHIT....You've obviously NOT been paying attention! Roll Eyes


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 9656 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.

IANAL and this is a serious question: Are previous SCOTUS decisions inviolate? Even if it is pretty clear that a prior court was wrong, are we stuck with whatever they ruled forever?
 
Posts: 7216 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Are previous SCOTUS decisions inviolate? Even if it is pretty clear that a prior court was wrong, are we stuck with whatever they ruled forever?

NO. Just as Congress is not bound by the acts of a prior Congress, the Court is NOT bound by the decisions of a prior Court. Here are two of the more famous reversals:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court held that the US Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and so the rights and privileges that the Constitution confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

Roberts is just "concerned about the institution of the Court" and his reputation on the DC cocktail circuit. He is a little man without balls.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24868 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of fpuhan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by erj_pilot:
Because the Left HATES President Trump more than they HATE America.


Question posed this morning by Chris Plante, conservative radio talk personality: "Which do Democrats consider their worst defeat: The loss by the Confederates in 1865, or Trump's triumph over Hillary in 2016?"




You can't truly call yourself "peaceful" unless you are capable of great violence. If you're not capable of great violence, you're not peaceful, you're harmless.

NRA Benefactor/Patriot Member
 
Posts: 2857 | Location: Peoples Republic of North Virginia | Registered: December 04, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by slosig:
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
The law the court was deciding was nearly word-for-word a duplication of a Texas law struck down in 2016. Had the court allowed the Louisiana to stand, it would have been in direct conflict with the 2016 ruling.

IANAL and this is a serious question: Are previous SCOTUS decisions inviolate? Even if it is pretty clear that a prior court was wrong, are we stuck with whatever they ruled forever?
Ever heard of Roe Vs. Wade? IMO that is hands down the biggest failure of the SCOTUS, ever. 'Zero' constitutional standing and support. A decision pulled right out of the air and/or the justices asses. Everyone knows this decision was total bullshit, but no one has any interest in fixing it. Roe will likely never be overturned because of equal parts of the court's arrogance and cowardice.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 1307 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year IV

© SIGforum 2024