SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Justice Department sues Apple, alleging it illegally monopolized the smartphone market
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Justice Department sues Apple, alleging it illegally monopolized the smartphone market Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
Government regulation of 'feature richness'/ease of use. I don't see that in the Constitution...
I have a number of hdwe/software packages I'd like enhanced. Sheesh.
Fabulous.
 
Posts: 34 | Registered: March 30, 2019Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
I believe that everyone knows that the only reason there are issues with iOS to Android messaging (blue-box vs. green-box), is due to Apple downgrading the texts to SMS,
And how else, exactly, would a text message get to a non-iOS/non-iMessage device unless the transport was switched to SMS/MMS?
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
It’s time for Apple to fix texting.
Ah, I see: RCS.

Maybe you should've read your own link. Essentially you're demanding Apple throw iMessage and SMS/MMS aside to implement a protocol that is clearly dominated by a competitor: Google.
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
Yes, one can jump through hoops to communicate with the latest tech advances, if they so choose... Apple is the only device manufacturer that makes their following have to go to such lengths to communicate utilizing modern messaging platforms. Big Grin

I think that would fall under the definition of "Stifle".
Your Google love/Apple hate is showing. Either that or you don't know the history of RCS. Or both Wink
quote:

... RCS requires a mobile data connection to do its thing in the same way as iMessage, WhatsApp, and other messaging services. SMS still runs over a voice-only cellular connection. It can and should remain as a fallback for those times when you have no Wi-Fi or cellular data available. The Google Messages app can already do this between RCS and SMS in the same way that Apple’s Messages app has been handling iMessage and SMS since its inception.
...
However, that collaboration ultimately fell apart, leaving RCS largely in the hands of Google. That may have been a good thing in the end, as the CCMI had reportedly planned to create its own standalone RCS app that would have ended up being yet another third-party messaging app. By comparison, Google had already integrated RCS into its re-branded Google Messages app, like the SMS replacement that it’s intended to be.

Instead, carriers and manufacturers have gradually adopted Google Messages as the default messaging app on all their devices. Even Samsung, which has its own RCS-compatible Samsung Messages app, positions Google Messages as the default on its new smartphones. Although Samsung Messages is preinstalled as an alternative and can be switched to the default for those who prefer to use that instead, it still uses the exact same RCS standard found in Google Messages.

For its part, Google has added its own extension to RCS to support end-to-end encryption in Google Messages — something that’s currently not part of the RCS Universal Standard.
(emphasis added) Full article: What is RCS messaging? A briefing on the SMS successor

So your position is that Apple be obliged to adopt a competitor's messaging standard, is it?

Note that "standard" RCS, whatever that means, is not E2EE, which means iThings messaging falling back to RCS will still have to have the dreaded green bubble, indicating they're insecure.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26113 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
What color are the messages on Android-to-Android texts? Are the green? I don't know, because I have never used a non-Apple smartphone.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31940 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
Yes, one can jump through hoops to communicate with the latest tech advances, if they so choose... Apple is the only device manufacturer that makes their following have to go to such lengths to communicate utilizing modern messaging platforms. Big Grin

I think that would fall under the definition of "Stifle".


quote:
Originally posted by architect:
I suspect this has more to do with Apple Store policies than anything inherent in the marketing of the phones themselves. They severely restrict certain apps and features that compete with their own software offerings, disallowing access to the Store in the name of "security" when it is actually intended to suppress competition. This results in fewer choices for their users. But, yes, it is kind of a BS lawsuit, Apple's deep pockets may have some relevance...or, perhaps, in an election year they want to be able to say, "see we don't just go after Conservative companies."



How can you even pretend this is reality?

First, Apple has a minority of overall smartphone phone sales. Almost every other smartphone runs some version of Android, so that is the numerical dominant smartphone platform by simple math.

Second, if a user cannot download one messaging app to use in place of Apple’s and that one tiny situation creates a Full Stop for messaging use, I question their ability to use a smartphone in any ‘smart’ fashion.

I have installed:

Teams
Signal
WhatsApp
RingCentral
Meet
Skype
WebEx
WebEx Meet
Zoom
Jabber
Session
ZohoMeeting
and probably another couple I missed.

That doesn’t even include Facebook or X.
 
Posts: 597 | Location: Alaska | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
Thanks for that post, ensigmatic. Very informative, and directly addresses comments made by others.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9874 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Justice Department sues Apple, alleging it illegally monopolized the smartphone market

Here's how these lawsuits work:
The "Justice Department" picks a target, usually based on deep pockets. They sue allegedly to cure some societal ill.

It's very expensive to defend. It doesn't matter how ridiculous the case is, the target will usually settle. They don't have to admit any wrongdoing, they just have to give a pot full of money to some organization with a cute sounding name that will claim it is going to do something in "the public interest".

These organizations are all front groups for Democrats. They give the money to their friends who in turn give contributions to Democrat campaigns. It's a huge money laundering and campaign finance operation.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 25242 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm entitled to this Title
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
So your position is that Apple be obliged to adopt a competitor's messaging standard, is it?
Being that RCS not a "competitor's standard", but rather a GSMA messaging protocol that is the successor to SMS/MMS.. I am not onboard with that argument.

quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
Maybe you should've read your own link. Essentially you're demanding Apple throw iMessage and SMS/MMS aside to implement a protocol that is clearly dominated by a competitor: Google.

No one is saying that they should implement the Google standard.
Apple will be supporting RCS standard features later this year.

Much like how they drug their feet on changing from Lightening ports to USB-C charging; the lack of RSC features was all about propriety leverage. They hold out as long as they can.


It is interesting that there are individuals who feel that standardizing communication protocols is a bad thing.
Apple is well known for it's anti-consumer practices and forcing it's sheep users into propriety entanglement.
The removal of all ports on MacBook and replacement with only propriety Thunderbolt ports.. iTunes DRM was huge a decade ago and now their iTunes purchases are DRM-free and transferable to other devices. Batterygate (planned obsolescence) was an interesting one that the Apple fanboi's readily ignore.

Don't get me wrong.. The marketing scheme is great. Roping users in and locking them into future use of one's products is the ultimate scheme and I can respect the game.
Literally forcing your consumers to upgrade devices by slowing them down, and then users joyfully following suite.. -it doesn't get much better! Big Grin

Jailbreaking/rooting iPhones in the 2000's and moding open source apps back in the day, was more fun than necessity. It also highlighted how much Apple hates the open source community.



 
Posts: 14006 | Location: WV | Registered: October 12, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
No one is saying that they should implement the Google standard.
Apple will be supporting RCS standard features later this year.
I guess you didn't actually bother to read my comments, much less the linked article.

The "RCS standard" has been in a state of flux, culminating in ...
quote:
Not to be outdone by Google, the big three U.S. carriers — AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon — made RCS plans of their own in 2019.
...
However, that collaboration ultimately fell apart, leaving RCS largely in the hands of Google.
...
... carriers and manufacturers have gradually adopted Google Messages as the default messaging app on all their devices.
So RCS didn't really become "standardized" until sometime subsequent to 2019 and, even then ...
quote:
For its part, Google has added its own extension to RCS to support end-to-end encryption in Google Messages — something that’s currently not part of the RCS Universal Standard.
So is it really standardized even now?
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
Much like how they drug their feet on changing from Lightening ports to USB-C charging; ...
Apple developed Lightning in response to the rest of the industry dragging their feet and in-fighting over USB-C standards. They got fed up with it and moved on. By the time USB-C became a reality Apple and their customers had an investment in Lightning. It should come as no surprise they dragged their feet in making the switch to USB-C.

May shock you to know not all Apple users are giddy with delight over Apple transitioning to USB-C, btw.

There are plenty of legitimate issues over which to criticize Apple. RCS and Lighting aren't, IMO, among them.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26113 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by American Pit Bull:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
So your position is that Apple be obliged to adopt a competitor's messaging standard, is it?
Being that RCS not a "competitor's standard", but rather a GSMA messaging protocol that is the successor to SMS/MMS.. I am not onboard with that argument.

quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
Maybe you should've read your own link. Essentially you're demanding Apple throw iMessage and SMS/MMS aside to implement a protocol that is clearly dominated by a competitor: Google.

No one is saying that they should implement the Google standard.
Apple will be supporting RCS standard features later this year.

Much like how they drug their feet on changing from Lightening ports to USB-C charging; the lack of RSC features was all about propriety leverage. They hold out as long as they can.


It is interesting that there are individuals who feel that standardizing communication protocols is a bad thing.
Apple is well known for it's anti-consumer practices and forcing it's sheep users into propriety entanglement.
The removal of all ports on MacBook and replacement with only propriety Thunderbolt ports.. iTunes DRM was huge a decade ago and now their iTunes purchases are DRM-free and transferable to other devices. Batterygate (planned obsolescence) was an interesting one that the Apple fanboi's readily ignore.

Don't get me wrong.. The marketing scheme is great. Roping users in and locking them into future use of one's products is the ultimate scheme and I can respect the game.
Literally forcing your consumers to upgrade devices by slowing them down, and then users joyfully following suite.. -it doesn't get much better! Big Grin

Jailbreaking/rooting iPhones in the 2000's and moding open source apps back in the day, was more fun than necessity. It also highlighted how much Apple hates the open source community.


You literally don’t seem to understand the meaning of the word literally.

Or proprietary.

Or locking.

Or forcing.

Only the Federal government is literally trying to force anything here.
 
Posts: 597 | Location: Alaska | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
What color are the messages on Android-to-Android texts? Are the green? I don't know, because I have never used a non-Apple smartphone.


It depends on the app you are using. Some even let you select different colors for different people.
 
Posts: 4713 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm entitled to this Title
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by onegeek:
You literally don’t seem to understand the meaning of the word literally.

Or proprietary.

Or locking.

Or forcing.

Only the Federal government is literally trying to force anything here.
lol. That's rich. Pardon my informal use of the word when exaggerating the actions of rendering the device unusable by slowing the OS; prompting users to "upgrade" with new devices.
I am not a proponent of the ultimate monopoly (US Gov) forcing anything on the private sector. But Apple has proven to push the envelope far enough, with consumers, that it is inevitable. One loses track of the number of antitrust and class action lawsuits filed against Apple.



 
Posts: 14006 | Location: WV | Registered: October 12, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
So you’re saying no one was literally forced or locked into anything?

So you’ve got nothing but a personal dislike?
 
Posts: 597 | Location: Alaska | Registered: September 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
Yet they keep letting Amazon chug along putting smaller competitors out of business.

Or did Apple just refuse to make their last few political donations?




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 38604 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rightwire:
Or did Apple just refuse to make their last few political donations?


Probably. They've also been making a more significant push into user privacy instead of sharing everything with the Feds without a warrant.
 
Posts: 4713 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
From the AP story
quote:

“The Department of Justice has an enduring legacy taking on the biggest and toughest monopolies in history,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, head of the antitrust division, at a press conference announcing the lawsuit.


In 1998 (?) the DOJ sued Microsoft for monopolistic practices. If I recall it was browser integration with the OS. I thought that was bullshit then and I think this is bullshit now. I'm not sure how once you buy an iPhone you're "locked in"? I went from an iPhone, to a winPhone, to an Android. Not one time did I think that I could not move out of the stack. I do know that our UI devs love OSx for development and our API devs love Win. God bless'em. We're taking our technology to web applications that behave like native apps. (Yes you can do it) Fuck Apple Store and fuck Google Play. Many other companies are doing the same as we are. It is very expensive to write a native phone / tablet app and a web app for the same underlying data set(s). DOJ seems like they have their heads in a very dark place when it comes to tech.
 
Posts: 7851 | Registered: October 31, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm entitled to this Title
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by onegeek:
So you’re saying no one was literally forced or locked into anything?

So you’ve got nothing but a personal dislike?
A documented history of anti-consumer practices and over one billion dollars in fines, due to price-fixing and consumer protection violations, is not just a personal opinion. Big Grin



 
Posts: 14006 | Location: WV | Registered: October 12, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
^^^^^
Re: “not just a personal opinion.”
Yeah, it’s the opinion of Biden’s so called DOJ.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9874 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm entitled to this Title
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
^^^^^
Re: “not just a personal opinion.”
Yeah, it’s the opinion of Biden’s so called DOJ.
Referring to the dozens of major consumer related fines over the past 20 years.
-Only a handful in recent years.



 
Posts: 14006 | Location: WV | Registered: October 12, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DanH:
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
What color are the messages on Android-to-Android texts? Are the green? I don't know, because I have never used a non-Apple smartphone.


It depends on the app you are using. Some even let you select different colors for different people.


I had to look, as I truly don't care & never really noticed. Mostly its the double check marks on the sent & read receipts.
Samsung S23
OE Messages App running Dark Theme
SMS - Light blue w black text
RCS - Dark blue w black text




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of cparktd
posted Hide Post
It is not a huge stretch from this to complain you can't buy a Ford with a Chevy engine.

There are better things they could do with taxpayer money.

No one HAS to buy Apple. Let the free market vote with their money.



Collecting dust.
 
Posts: 4254 | Location: Middle Tennessee | Registered: February 07, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Justice Department sues Apple, alleging it illegally monopolized the smartphone market

© SIGforum 2025