April 01, 2019, 03:09 PM
SIGnifiedNYT Article: "People Kill People. But the Bullets Seem to Matter."
I am pretty sure that more people die by .22LR versus any other caliber/year. I believe it’s due to availability and prevalence of that kind a firearm/caliber.
April 01, 2019, 03:16 PM
2PAKSaw a few dead and dying as a Policeman. The most suffering was from .22 shootings. Seemed to tumble around and tear things up.
April 01, 2019, 09:25 PM
vthoky^^^
Does a .22 round generally tumble more than others?
(Genuinely curious, not argumentative.)
April 01, 2019, 09:48 PM
DSgrouseWhy are the rounds measured in cm length wise. It seems that meme about "thats not how this works" would be appropriate.
April 02, 2019, 03:00 AM
flashguyquote:
Originally posted by cslinger:
I like how they insinuated that 9mm and .45 came on the scene in the 90s. Well I guess technically correct....the 1890s.
God don’t tell them about 10mm.....that’d Be one hell of a weapon of mass distraction for them.
Or the .50AE or .500 Magnum . . . .
flashguy
April 02, 2019, 10:27 AM
smschulzI've often wondered why the Libs never went after the caliber?
Completely ridiculous but makes perfect Libtard-Sense.
April 02, 2019, 10:52 AM
RichardCAnything larger than .50 ist verboten. Long time.
April 02, 2019, 11:35 AM
egregoreI think it likely that more victims of death by gunshot (excluding war) were shot with .22 LR.
April 02, 2019, 11:56 AM
corsairThat article is example #475,328 of liberals attempting to use analytics to solve a problem they don't understand or have any familiarity. Pretty easy to image a bunch of propeller-heads, sitting around, earnest in their desire to find a solution but, really not having any grasp of what they are reading, layer on top their own bias', then having a reporter write up an article on their findings. Predictable outcome.
So, a .223, a 5.56 and a .22L are all the same, its just what measuring standard is being used, right?.38 is bigger and more dangerous than a .357, right?why do they call it a varmint round?April 02, 2019, 12:56 PM
SecurityGeekSo if the author of this article is correct, the .75 and .69 caliber muskets used in the Revolutionary War should have been WAY more dangerous than today’s tiny-by-comparison .357 and .45 rounds, right?
BTW - any idea what the 83% fatal rounds were? “Other” seems to be the one to get, at least if you live in Boston.
April 02, 2019, 09:00 PM
vthokyquote:
Originally posted by DSgrouse:
Why are the rounds measured in cm length wise. It seems that meme about "that's not how this works" would be appropriate.
I agree entirely.
quote:
Originally posted by RichardC:
Anything larger than .50 ist verboten. Long time.
I didn't know that. I had wondered why .50 seemed to be the largest I'd heard of, but hadn't really put any serious thought or research into it.
April 02, 2019, 10:17 PM
dsietsquote:
Originally posted by SIGnified:
I am pretty sure that more people die by .22LR versus any other caliber/year. I believe it’s due to availability and prevalence of that kind a firearm/caliber.
And add the fact that many .22 target/plinkers have very light triggers. They can't help but go off at the uninitiated booger hook fondling.