Today's front page:

quote:

Originally posted by oddball: . . . [snip] . . .
IMO, the next guy to represent the Dems will be this guy:
[picture of Gruesome Nuisance, uh, I mean Gruesome NewScum, uh I mean Gavin Newsom removed.]

. . . [snip] . . .

You’re probably right, but man I hope you’re wrong.

Joe Biden was a stupid, lying, slimy, corrupt piece of filth when he went into politics. The dementia has not improved him.

Gruesome NewScum differs from Biden in that he isn’t stupid. If there is a list of the top ten people that the world would be better without, Gavin Newsom is likely on it. If there is a list of the top ten people that the state of California would be better without, Gavin Newsom would almost certainly top it.

Can we imagine (hope, even) that she'll finally retire?

quote:

Originally posted by vthoky:


Can we imagine (hope, even) that she'll finally retire?

Or lays in state at the rotunda for a week...

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

Originally posted by oddball: . . . [snip] . . .
IMO, the next guy to represent the Dems will be this guy:
[picture of Gruesome Nuisance, uh, I mean Gruesome NewScum, uh I mean Gavin Newsom removed.]

. . . [snip] . . .

You’re probably right, but man I hope you’re wrong.

Joe Biden was a stupid, lying, slimy, corrupt piece of filth when he went into politics. The dementia has not improved him.

Gruesome NewScum differs from Biden in that he isn’t stupid. If there is a list of the top ten people that the world would be better without, Gavin Newsom is likely on it. If there is a list of the top ten people that the state of California would be better without, Gavin Newsom would almost certainly top it.

Newsome vs JD Vance? Bring it Douche Nozzle.

quote:

Originally posted by downtownv:
Newsome vs JD Vance? Bring it Douche Nozzle.

You’re not wrong there, JD is a sharp cat and I’d betting on him. I’d just rather that Gruesome NewScum found a steam roller to press his suit with him in it than that he become the new face of the GDCs.

Didn’t Joe once declare “Nobody fucks with the Bidens” or something like that?


https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1855241022436999528

I do enjoy their work over at the NEW YORK POST...It's like the Babylon Bee w/o the Satire!

quote:

Originally posted by vthoky:


Can we imagine (hope, even) that she'll finally retire?

She just got re elected .

quote:

Originally posted by selogic:
She just got re elected .

Dang.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
What’s going on with Hunter?

If I were Hunter, I wouldn't have a worry in the world. Biden will pardon him, as he should frankly.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
What’s going on with Hunter?

If I were Hunter, I wouldn't have a worry in the world. Biden will pardon him, as he should frankly.

OK; Why should he pardon Hunter, other than he is his son? He did a lot more than he was convicted for.

^^^

I’ll be pretty surprised if ole Joe doesn’t pardon his son. It is his son, and I think most fathers would if they had the power. Heck, I would in such a case.

The more likely scenario in my mind is he won’t need to as it will probably be arranged that Hunter isn’t sentenced to any time, so pardoning would not be necessary.

Other than that it would be a way to tweak his enemies one last time before fading away into obscurity and he does seem to be pretty petty.

Joe will pardon Hunter. And with Joe out of politics, Hunter will be broke. Without the Big Guy, there is no reason for anyone to do any business with Hunter. Free and broke and having to get a real job for the first time in his life will be punishment enough.

Funny how Jill no longer holds him up.

https://rumble.com/v5nynkk-pre...-rehoboth-beach.html

Wow - navigating sand appears to be very difficult for Joe...

quote:

Originally posted by Lefty Sig:
Joe will pardon Hunter. And with Joe out of politics, Hunter will be broke. Without the Big Guy, there is no reason for anyone to do any business with Hunter. Free and broke and having to get a real job for the first time in his life will be punishment enough.

Regardless, he needs to go to prison. You pardon people who might have been misjudged or have demonstrated change. You don't pardon people just because of a relationship. Prison, he needs to go.

FJB legitimately struggles on the beach but, knowing folks are watching, he makes like it's an act, the fake jogging move and such.

"I meant to do that" -- Pee Wee Herman

In Bidens attempt to cut off President Trump...

Judicial Shockwave – Major Setback Hits Biden’s Immigration Plan
Federal Judge J. Campbell Barker has struck down Biden’s “Keeping Families Together” program, dealing a blow to the administration’s immigration reform efforts and potentially affecting half a million undocumented immigrants.
At a Glance
• Judge Barker ruled that the Biden administration overstepped its authority with the program
• The program aimed to provide legal status to unauthorized immigrants married to U.S. citizens
• Approximately 500,000 immigrants were estimated to benefit from the now-halted program
• The ruling highlights tensions between executive policy initiatives and statutory restrictions
• This decision may face appeal but could be challenged by the incoming Trump administration
Biden’s Immigration Reform Hits a Legal Roadblock
In a significant setback for the Biden administration’s immigration reform agenda, Federal Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas has struck down the “Keeping Families Together” program. This initiative, designed to offer relief to illegal immigrants married to U.S. citizens, has been declared illegal, throwing a wrench into the administration’s efforts to address complex immigration issues.
The program, which aimed to provide a pathway to legal status for an estimated 500,000 undocumented immigrants, was challenged by Texas and 15 other states. Judge Barker, appointed during the Trump presidency, found that the program lacked the necessary statutory backing under current U.S. immigration law to lawfully offer “parole in place” to those concerned.
Overstepping Executive Authority
At the heart of Judge Barker’s ruling is the assertion that the Biden administration misinterpreted immigration law and exceeded its authority. The Department of Homeland Security faced accusations of attempting to grant mass amnesty without Congressional approval, a move that critics argue undermines the established legal framework for immigration enforcement.
“The Rule exceeds statutory authority and is not in accordance with law for this reason as well.” – Judge Barker
This ruling underscores the intricate nature of aligning immigration enforcement mechanisms with familial bonds in a legally restrictive environment. It also highlights the ongoing tension between executive policy initiatives and the limitations imposed by current immigration statutes.
Impact on Mixed-Status Families
The now-halted program would have allowed illegal aliens present in the U.S. for over ten years to receive “parole” without leaving the country if they were spouses or stepchildren of U.S. citizens. This approach was intended to promote family unity among mixed-status households and provide work permits, deportation protections, and a path to permanent residency for eligible immigrants.
“A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration program that would allow unauthorized immigrants married to American citizens to get legal status and a streamlined path to U.S. citizenship, declaring the policy illegal.”
Current U.S. immigration law requires those who entered illegally to leave and re-enter legally to obtain a green card, which can lead to a 3 or 10-year exile. The Biden program aimed to circumvent this requirement by allowing eligible immigrants to apply for a green card without leaving the U.S. by granting them parole.
Political Ramifications and Future Challenges
The ruling has ignited a firestorm of political debate, with conservative states applauding the decision and immigration advocates expressing dismay. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey criticized the Biden administration’s handling of border security, emphasizing the need for state intervention.
“Joe Biden and Kamala Harris created a crisis at the southern border, leaving the American people to pay the consequences. In the wake of the federal government’s refusal to act, states like Missouri had no choice but to step in and take action to secure our southern border,” said Attorney General Bailey. “We filed suit to ensure millions of unvetted individuals are not invading our communities.” – Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey
With Trump’s recent election victory, the future of immigration reform looks increasingly uncertain. The incoming administration has promised a potential crackdown on undocumented individuals, with Trump vowing “mass deportation.”
As the Justice Department considers appealing the ruling, the fate of hundreds of thousands of mixed-status families hangs in the balance. This legal battle serves as a stark reminder of the complex challenges facing immigration reform efforts and the need for a comprehensive, bipartisan approach to address this contentious issue.
https://totalconservative.com/...ter&utm_medium=email

Completely pathetic. If he hadn't tried to destroy my country I'd feel sorry for him, but there ya go.