SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Looks Like the Thunderbirds are Down One Plane
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Looks Like the Thunderbirds are Down One Plane Login/Join 
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted
apparently it was flipped over in a storm at the Dayton show...

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/...4T?OCID=ansmsnnews11



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 54063 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Yes, I was following that closely. Glad they are OK.

(I live about 20 minutes away; it was raining cats and dogs today--lots of flood warnings).

Latest: the Thunderbirds will NOT perform tomorrow.
 
Posts: 514 | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
One plane captain is probably in a world of hurt right now.
 
Posts: 238 | Registered: March 11, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
Nah. He's happy the crew walked away.

(no one will see the tears...)

He'll get another jet.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44720 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
Looks to me as if something is missing from the news article. I says that wind gusts were 11 to 17. That's not much at all; even a moderately skilled pilot can handle that in a Cessna 172.

There must have been something else, or maybe the wind was significantly under-reported.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31708 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Article said the plane ran off the end of the runway.
 
Posts: 7173 | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mikeyspizza
posted Hide Post
Per CNN, it took over 90 minutes to get the 2 guys out. That's a long time to be sitting there upside down.

Pilot has been released from hospital, maintenance tech still in hospital. Today's performance has been cancelled. Sunday's performance TBD. Per USAF Thunderbirds' facebook page.
 
Posts: 4092 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: August 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
Per CNN, it took over 90 minutes to get the 2 guys out. That's a long time to be sitting there upside down. Luckily, looks like minor injuries.


I bet you have to be really careful, and know what you are doing, to not activate the ejection seats.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Item number one on the "Landing upside down" checklist is....

1) Ejection seat safety pin inserted.


__________________________
Keep your rotor in the green
The aircraft in trim
Your time over target short
Make it count
 
Posts: 1437 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: November 09, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ulsterman:
Article said the plane ran off the end of the runway.
Respectfully, I have to say that this is not clear. The article actually said "ran off the runway." It does not specify whether it ran off the end, which might have been due to poor braking conditions, hydroplaning on a wet runway, brake failure, landing too fast or too far down the runway, etc.

Another "ran off the runway" condition could be running off to the side due to loss of directional control.

The article did not specify whether the airplane ran off the end, or to the side, it just said "ran off the runway."

In more than fifty years as a flight instructor, I have seen way, way, more airplanes depart the runway to the side, as in loss of directional control, than I have seen running off the end, as in insufficient braking ability.

However, with the winds reported in the article, gusting 11 to 17, I have a hard time believing that a highly experienced pilot would lose directional control due to winds. While this happened to an Air Force pilot, as opposed to a Navy guy who is trained to touch down precisely in order to grab an arresting wire with a tail hook, I still have to believe that an Air Force guy would be able to routinely touch down within + / - 100 feet or so of his target on a runway that is thousands of feet long, so landing long is probably not the cause if he did run off the end. Maybe a mechanical problem (brake failure)? That has happened to me, but my touchdown speed was low enough that I was still able to stop on the runway.

That is why I originally said that it is pretty apparent that we are not getting the whole story.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31708 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
Per CNN, it took over 90 minutes to get the 2 guys out. That's a long time to be sitting there upside down. Luckily, looks like minor injuries.


I bet you have to be really careful, and know what you are doing, to not activate the ejection seats.
Correct. Even when "safed" by the aircrew, you don't want to start banging on portions of the seat.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RHINOWSO:
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
Per CNN, it took over 90 minutes to get the 2 guys out. That's a long time to be sitting there upside down. Luckily, looks like minor injuries.


I bet you have to be really careful, and know what you are doing, to not activate the ejection seats.
Correct. Even when "safed" by the aircrew, you don't want to start banging on portions of the seat.


Can it be done with the canopy closed and intact?




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
Yes, ejection seats can be armed / safed separately from the canopy position, but normally are armed only with the canopy in the down position (at least in the Navy).

Even with the seats "safe", some joe banging on the seat without though could possibly fire the seat. A mishap years ago had a 'safed' seat fire a tech into the rafters when he hit something on the back of the seat inadvertently.

Mind you just putting your hands on it wont do it, but pulling, kicking, prying (like in a situation like this) without knowledge of the mechanism could be, ah, very dangerous. So I'm certain that was a consideration for getting the crew out safely.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:

Can it be done with the canopy closed and intact?


probably not where a pilot can reach the disarm doohicky for the ejection seat, while strapped in and hanging upside down....



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11574 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
The aircrew "safe / arm' levers are close and able to be actuated by them strapped into the seat.

But more permanent ways of safing the seat completely are not, nor would an aircrew typically know how to do it, unless they were a seat tech previously.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mikeyspizza:
Per CNN, it took over 90 minutes to get the 2 guys out. That's a long time to be sitting there upside down.

Pilot has been released from hospital, maintenance tech still in hospital. Today's performance has been cancelled. Sunday's performance TBD. Per USAF Thunderbirds' facebook page.


I always wonder when you have a maintenance tech in the airplane. Are you just giving a good buddy a ride, or are you trying to demonstrate an issue you can't figure out on the ground...
 
Posts: 7221 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
quote:
Originally posted by ulsterman:
Article said the plane ran off the end of the runway.
Respectfully, I have to say that this is not clear. The article actually said "ran off the runway." It does not specify whether it ran off the end, which might have been due to poor braking conditions, hydroplaning on a wet runway, brake failure, landing too fast or too far down the runway, etc.

Another "ran off the runway" condition could be running off to the side due to loss of directional control.

The article did not specify whether the airplane ran off the end, or to the side, it just said "ran off the runway."

In more than fifty years as a flight instructor, I have seen way, way, more airplanes depart the runway to the side, as in loss of directional control, than I have seen running off the end, as in insufficient braking ability.

However, with the winds reported in the article, gusting 11 to 17, I have a hard time believing that a highly experienced pilot would lose directional control due to winds. While this happened to an Air Force pilot, as opposed to a Navy guy who is trained to touch down precisely in order to grab an arresting wire with a tail hook, I still have to believe that an Air Force guy would be able to routinely touch down within + / - 100 feet or so of his target on a runway that is thousands of feet long, so landing long is probably not the cause if he did run off the end. Maybe a mechanical problem (brake failure)? That has happened to me, but my touchdown speed was low enough that I was still able to stop on the runway.

That is why I originally said that it is pretty apparent that we are not getting the whole story.


While I defer to your experience, let me say this. Demonstration flight crews (Blue Angels, Thunderbirds, etc) preach safety. If there any doubt those planes could get up and down safely due to the conditions, they probably wouldn't have been flying. I've never investigated a plane crash but many auto/truck accidents. I would best guess this as a "failure to maintain control" due to conditions, mechanical failure, etc.
 
Posts: 7173 | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
" Ricardo von Puttkammer, chief correspondent for Aviation Photojournal, was out in the air field when he witnessed the two-seat Thunderbird taxi on the runway toward the staging area.

"It was raining, and I was taking pictures of some airplanes," he said. "The plane was taxing and it flipped. Right away the fire department personnel was running toward the accident." "


http://www.daytondailynews.com...ial_twitter_2014_sfp

The photos don't give a good top down view, so it's hard to figure out exactly on the airport, but it seems to have happened on the taxi back. The concrete looks slick and the photos immediately after show mist / rain, so either taxiing too fast for conditions and the planes braking system was unable to stop them from leaving the paved taxiway, or some sort of antiskid or steering malfunction, or a combination of the two.

Photo immediately after it happened.



The plane obviously had some speed on it when it left the pavement to flip that drastically. From the pictures the main landing gear is down and locked, can't see the nosegear with all the stuff in the way - although it was probably torn off, as the nose gear door is open. Lots of grass on the nose and intake.



Glad they are alright. Looking at the nose of the plane, it isn't gonna buff out.

 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Just saw RHINOWSO's pics. There goes my theory that they were trying to save a $1 million+ canopy replacement! Eek


--------------------------
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
-- H L Mencken

I always prefer reality when I can figure out what it is.
-- JALLEN 10/18/18
 
Posts: 9439 | Location: Illinois farm country | Registered: November 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RHINOWSO:
" Ricardo von Puttkammer, chief correspondent for Aviation Photojournal, was out in the air field when he witnessed the two-seat Thunderbird taxi on the runway toward the staging area.

"It was raining, and I was taking pictures of some airplanes," he said. "The plane was taxing and it flipped. Right away the fire department personnel was running toward the accident." "


http://www.daytondailynews.com...ial_twitter_2014_sfp

The photos don't give a good top down view, so it's hard to figure out exactly on the airport, but it seems to have happened on the taxi back. The concrete looks slick and the photos immediately after show mist / rain, so either taxiing too fast for conditions and the planes braking system was unable to stop them from leaving the paved taxiway, or some sort of antiskid or steering malfunction, or a combination of the two.

Photo immediately after it happened.



The plane obviously had some speed on it when it left the pavement to flip that drastically. From the pictures the main landing gear is down and locked, can't see the nosegear with all the stuff in the way - although it was probably torn off, as the nose gear door is open. Lots of grass on the nose and intake.



Glad they are alright. Looking at the nose of the plane, it isn't gonna buff out.



Top Pic: Was the plane headed L/R, R/L, Download/Top?
 
Posts: 7173 | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Looks Like the Thunderbirds are Down One Plane

© SIGforum 2024