SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Asks Lawyers To 'Stand Up' And 'Fight'
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Asks Lawyers To 'Stand Up' And 'Fight' Login/Join 
Member
posted
How can she claim impartiality?

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...yers-stand-and-fight

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor told a lawyers’ conference that amid escalating criticism in the nation of some federal judges, lawyers need to “stand up” and “fight this fight.”

Sotomayor made the comments during an on-stage conversation on May 8 at an American Bar Association conference at the Smithsonian Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington.

The remarks by Sotomayor came after President Donald Trump, members of his administration, and Republicans in Congress have repeatedly criticized court rulings in recent months that have blocked or delayed the president’s agenda. Trump and some lawmakers have accused some judges of overstepping their authority through such rulings and called for them to be impeached.

Several federal judges have said the Trump administration has not complied with various court orders on immigration enforcement, federal spending, the firing of government employees, and foreign aid. The administration denies that it disobeyed the orders.

Sotomayor did not identify Trump or other officeholders who have criticized judges’ rulings by name.

“Our job is to stand up for people who can’t do it themselves. And our job is to be the champion of lost causes,” said the associate justice who joined the Supreme Court in 2009 after being nominated by President Barack Obama.

“But right now, we can’t lose the battles we are facing. And we need trained and passionate and committed lawyers to fight this fight.”

“With all the uncertainty that exists at this moment, this is our time to stand up and be heard. For me, being here with you is an act of solidarity,” Sotomayor added.


_________________________
 
Posts: 14076 | Registered: January 17, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of jbcummings
posted Hide Post
So her job is to be an activist? Funny I thought her job was to judge whether a lower case ruling lined up with the constitution and legislated law.


———-
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for thou art crunchy and taste good with catsup.
 
Posts: 4321 | Location: DFW | Registered: May 21, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Spread the Disease
Picture of flesheatingvirus
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jbcummings:
So her job is to be an activist? Funny I thought her job was to judge whether a lower case ruling lined up with the constitution and legislated law.


Exactly what I thought when I read her quotes.


________________________________________

-- Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past me I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. --
 
Posts: 18184 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: October 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Expert308
posted Hide Post
Can a SCOTUS justice be impeached?
 
Posts: 7699 | Location: Idaho | Registered: February 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
by any definition of the word, Sotomayor has never shown the slightest hint of being 'supreme' at anything except for mediocrity

and even then, calling her mediocre is a slight against those who really are
 
Posts: 54560 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
quote:
"Aren't the Mediocre Entitled to a Little Representation?" Nixon's Failed Supreme Court Nominees

Nixon’s next nominee was Judge G. Harrold Carswell of the Fifth Circuit. Another “strict constructionist” Southerner, Carswell’s fate would be no better than Haynsworth’s. Carswell faced opposition for past stances on civil rights.[4] While running for local political office in 1948, he made remarks explicitly in favor of segregation. While a judge, his opinions seemed written to delay desegregation rather than promote it.

But it was not this that ensured his defeat. Carswell had a reputation for being an intellectual lightweight bordering on incompetence. In perhaps the greatest own-goal backfire, Republican Senator Hruska of Nebraska had this to say in support: “Even if he were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they, and a little chance? We can’t have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.” With supporters like these . .


Link


_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
 
Posts: 19185 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wcb6092:
“Our job is to stand up for people who can’t do it themselves. And our job is to be the champion of lost causes,” said the associate justice who joined the Supreme Court in 2009 after being nominated by President Barack Obama.

Someone might want to give her a copy of her job description.


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 21591 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Can a SCOTUS justice be impeached?

Yes.
Yes, a Supreme Court Justice can be impeached. The Constitution allows for impeachment and removal from office for judges, including Supreme Court Justices, for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". The House of Representatives initiates impeachment proceedings, and the Senate then holds the trial.
 
Posts: 18148 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Can a SCOTUS justice be impeached?

Yes. https://www.history.com/articl...-ever-been-impeached

quote:
Supreme Court justices serve for life, unless they resign or are impeached and removed from office. The reason for their lifetime tenure is ostensibly to enable them to make decisions free from any pressure by the executive or legislative branches of government. Since the Supreme Court first convened in 1790, there have been more than one hundred justices—and only one has ever been impeached.

In 1804, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to impeach Associate Justice Samuel Chase. A signer of the Declaration of Independence, Chase was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President George Washington in 1796. A Federalist, Chase irked Thomas Jefferson and his Republican allies in Congress, and was impeached on politically motivated charges of acting in a partisan manner during several trials. However, in 1805 Chase was acquitted by the Senate. He served on the court until his death in 1811.

In 1969, Abe Fortas became the first—and, to date, only—Supreme Court justice to resign under the threat of impeachment. Named to the court by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, Fortas was forced to step down due to financial improprieties that involved him agreeing to act as a paid consultant to the family foundation of a man under investigation for securities fraud.

In addition to Samuel Chase, 14 federal judges (who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate) have been impeached over the course of American history, on charges ranging from drunkenness on the bench to accepting bribes. The first impeachment was in 1803 and the most recent was in 2010. Eight of the jurists were convicted by the Senate and removed from office, while three were acquitted and three resigned.

She is definitely acting in a partisan manner.
 
Posts: 30116 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Impeach her? Sure, in theory. But, the spineless House Republicans will never give it a thought. Even if they did it successfully, the Senate will never vote to convict her.


Q






 
Posts: 29578 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Drill Here, Drill Now
Picture of tatortodd
posted Hide Post
^^^^ Agreed.

Slim majority in the House and it'd take a metric shit ton of pork filled promises for the usual jellyfish to rent a spine. Theoretically possible but lots of political capital expended to get the simple 50% majority.

Then, it goes to the Senate where it requires 2/3, and once again slim majority with several jellyfish. On top of that, there is a large group of Demonrats who would vote against impeachment even if she was caught red handed accepting a suitcase full of cash. She'd have to get caught drowning puppies or worse to get to 2/3.



Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity

DISCLAIMER: These are the author's own personal views and do not represent the views of the author's employer.
 
Posts: 24496 | Location: Northern Suburbs of Houston | Registered: November 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
Too bad the other justices won't take her behind the woodshed and 'counsel' her.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 9765 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
lawyers need to “stand up” and “fight this fight.”

Maybe she means that lawyers should act zealously on behalf of their clients (which they're supposed to do, even with clients we don't like). Maybe.
 
Posts: 30116 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
When Justice Sotomayor Asks Lawyers To 'Stand Up' And 'Fight'... she throws off any pretense of impartiality. But she also knows she won't be impeached. In fact, she will be widely hailed as a hero in the circles she travels.

"It's The Worst Scandal Ever" - Judicial Watch Founder Warns 'America Is Under Siege'

Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Renowned attorney Larry Klayman predicted on USAWatchdog.com that there would be full-blown, legal civil war happening in the court system. He also predicted that violence from the “rabid left” would not only increase but explode.

Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch USA, says there are now more than 233 federal court cases trying to stop or delay President Trump and his Administration.

Why all the attacks on President Trump? Klayman says

"They are attacking him because they hate him. . . . they are attacking him, and it’s all orchestrated. Washington is one giant, excuse the French, circle jerk. It’s a club.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...-america-under-siege



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 25949 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Of course she does. She loves the control of being what to tell others what they should do or how they should be. We are living in a different time and it is getting worse. The left loves the evil in the world and will ask it to do all sorts of violence in order to satisfy themselves. What other time was there when political leaders asked and praised others to do violence on their behalf against the same people in the nation with different views?
 
Posts: 7446 | Location: Treasure Coast,Fl. | Registered: July 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
Never go full Aunty Maxine...




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 45484 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Legalize the Constitution
Picture of TMats
posted Hide Post
The “wise Latina” rides again.


_______________________________________________________
despite them
 
Posts: 14237 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: January 10, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of downtownv
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
Impeach her? Sure, in theory. But, the spineless House Republicans will never give it a thought. Even if they did it successfully, the Senate will never vote to convict her.


Absolutely correct!
They can't even support the will of the people that voted for the MAGA Agenda! And they are most
likely representing these RED districts!


 
Posts: 9647 | Location: 18 miles long, 6 Miles at Sea | Registered: January 22, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Asks Lawyers To 'Stand Up' And 'Fight'

© SIGforum 2025