SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Selling to a New Yorker
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Selling to a New Yorker Login/Join 
Member
posted
I got a reply to one of my guns. The person asked if I could ship it without the magazines since they only allow 10 rounders (the featured gun has magazines that hold more than that).

That doesn't seem legal in a commie state like NY. How does a state know if a gun came with 10 rounders or it was done later. Is it the FFL that either accepts it and records it or not?
 
Posts: 4035 | Registered: January 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Leemur
posted Hide Post
Not worth it IMO.
 
Posts: 13865 | Location: Shenandoah Valley, VA | Registered: October 16, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My dog crosses the line
Picture of Jeff Yarchin
posted Hide Post
FFL to FFL.
 
Posts: 12950 | Registered: June 20, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Yarchin:
FFL to FFL.

Of course it would be FFL to FFL. Just wondering if what is suggested is fine or not. I'm with Leemur in that I don't think it's worth it unless someone knows for sure what the facts are.
 
Posts: 4035 | Registered: January 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Crusty old
curmudgeon
Picture of Jimbo54
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Yarchin:
FFL to FFL.


This. It's takes any and all responsibility off of your shoulders.

Jim


________________________

"If you can't be a good example, then you'll have to be a horrible warning" -Catherine Aird
 
Posts: 9791 | Location: The right side of Washington State | Registered: September 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My dog crosses the line
Picture of Jeff Yarchin
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 1s1k:
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Yarchin:
FFL to FFL.

Of course it would be FFL to FFL. Just wondering if what is suggested is fine or not. I'm with Leemur in that I don't think it's worth it unless someone knows for sure what the facts are.


Then there is nothing to be concerned about. The FFL's are responsible, not you.
 
Posts: 12950 | Registered: June 20, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
Does the manufacturer of your gun sell 10 round mags for it? If they do, it doesn't seem your gun is illegal unless you ship the higher round mags with it. The gun isn't altered to carry a 10 round mag, its just the mag that is different. However, I agree with the other posters that since you are shipping FFL to FFL, they are the ones responsible for the legalities.



.
 
Posts: 9043 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
My selling policy is not to separate anything (mags) from the gun. If you live in a commie state, don't bother.


Q






 
Posts: 27956 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
It is a case of firearms buyer not wanting to violate the laws of his state of residence.

There is nothing preventing you from shipping the gun without magazines (provided the buyer is completely aware of this); in fact doing so eliminates and legal problem for you WRT the magazines.

At one time it was common to ship standard capacity magazines to a NYS-based FFL, who would removed them from the incoming transfer gun. The NYS-based FFL would then sell them to NYS LEOs.
The NYS-based FFL who would in turn credit the gun's buyer toward purchase of low capacity magazines. I can't guess why the buyer of yours gun isn't doing that.

Bottom line: Its legal to do, provided everyone is aware of what's going on.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32258 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Hop head
Picture of lyman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sig2340:
It is a case of firearms buyer not wanting to violate the laws of his state of residence.

There is nothing preventing you from shipping the gun without magazines (provided the buyer is completely aware of this); in fact doing so eliminates and legal problem for you WRT the magazines.

.



yep,

mag limit is 10 rounds

and the buyer asked you to ship with out,

so once payment and FFL are in hand, ship
sell the mags on in the Classifieds,


easy peasy and no drama

enjoy



https://chandlersfirearms.com/chesterfield-armament/
 
Posts: 10636 | Location: Beach VA,not VA Beach | Registered: July 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Happens in CA all the time. Not only can you ( as a resident of some other state) not sell me your gun if it isn’t on “the roster” you can not ship a 11+ round Mag. So say you could sell me a CA legal gun. Like a glock 17 gen 3. Even though I can buy one new, you have one for a screaming good deal. She’s the gun sans Mag and I’m on my own to locate a 10 rounder
 
Posts: 5049 | Location: Florida Panhandle  | Registered: November 23, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If you don't mind my asking, what is the make/model?

Unfortunately, the NYS Penal code has a section on pistol "Assault Weapons" (N.Y. Penal Law § 265.00(22)) FFLs can take possession of said "assault" pistols but can only sell them to specific people. For example a Berretta 92A3 would be an "assault pistol" because it has a threaded barrel.

Otherwise, sending the pistol without the magazine shouldn't be an issue. It's the FFls in NY can receive hi capacity (over 10 rounds) they just can't sell them to John Q. Citizen.
 
Posts: 4791 | Location: Where ever Uncle Sam Sends Me | Registered: March 05, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
My selling policy is not to separate anything (mags) from the gun. If you live in a commie state, don't bother.


Amen
 
Posts: 970 | Location: Virginia | Registered: August 03, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the good info guys.

quote:
Originally posted by CD228:
If you don't mind my asking, what is the make/model?

Unfortunately, the NYS Penal code has a section on pistol "Assault Weapons" (N.Y. Penal Law § 265.00(22)) FFLs can take possession of said "assault" pistols but can only sell them to specific people. For example a Berretta 92A3 would be an "assault pistol" because it has a threaded barrel.

Otherwise, sending the pistol without the magazine shouldn't be an issue. It's the FFls in NY can receive hi capacity (over 10 rounds) they just can't sell them to John Q. Citizen.


It's a Walther PPQ .45.
 
Posts: 4035 | Registered: January 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Yarchin:
quote:
Originally posted by 1s1k:
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Yarchin:
FFL to FFL.

Of course it would be FFL to FFL. Just wondering if what is suggested is fine or not. I'm with Leemur in that I don't think it's worth it unless someone knows for sure what the facts are.


Then there is nothing to be concerned about. The FFL's are responsible, not you.


This. It is legal to ship the gun and magazines to a NY FFL, and the FFL would then retain the magazines to sell to LEO or out of state etc.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: jimmy123x,
 
Posts: 21421 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
"Member"
Picture of cas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jimmy123x:
...as long as you're not shipping magazines over 10 rounds to NY with the gun.


^ This.. is incorrect.

Sending the gun without the evil 10+ round magazines... 100% legal.

Sending the gun with the evil 10+ round magazines... also 100% legal. (since it's going to an FFL)

If the gun is something that's not legal here... it's still 100% legal for you to ship it to the FFL. NY's dumb laws do not apply to FFL's.

It's pretty common for guys to buy things that aren't legal here (guns and magazines) and to have the dealer make them compliant before they hand it over.

Or:
Sometimes the buyer is LEO exempt.
Sometimes people will have the FFL hold the mags to sell to exempt LEO.
Sometimes the FFL will hold the mags and either the FFL or buyer will sell them online with the FFL shipping them.
Sometimes the buyer will stomp on the mags and have the dealer throw them away. ("I paid for them, they're mine even if I can't keep them, why should someone else make money off something I paid for?")

Please don't make this any more complicated than it need be. I do wish people would stop making up rules and laws that don't exist. It's bad enough we get fucked by the sate, we don't need people who are supposedly on our side doing it too.


_____________________________________________________
Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911.

 
Posts: 21454 | Location: 18th & Fairfax  | Registered: May 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mark60
posted Hide Post
We do it in NY all the time and it's 100% legal. The gun goes FFL to FFL and the mags stay with you.
 
Posts: 3568 | Location: God Awful New York | Registered: July 01, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
Not knowing the specifics of the NY law I won't comment on that aspect.

I can tell you that since the 15 round mag limit went into effect in CO it has made buying some new guns a real chore, as some dealers/ sellers refuse to replace mags with compliant ones (some will do so) which means that you are required to pay for a gun accessory that you will never receive even though the gun is perfectly legal to own, with or without any magazines.

As standard capacity mag ownership/ possession is "grandfathered" in under the law, many of us stocked up on magazines prior to the law going into effect and so, in some cases when we can convince a seller to sell the gun without mags (in some cases at no compensation, in some cases replacing the mags with compliant ones, and in some cases replacing the mag with something like a cleaning kit or sling) we still have legal mags in our possession for the gun we just bought.

I own standard cap. mags for guns that I don't currently own but hope to one day.

I'm deeply appreciative of the sellers who made accommodations and went the extra mile to sell me guns and magazines. Were it me, I wouldn't hesitate to help a fellow gun owner out by shipping it to him/ her in any configuration that allowed them to legally receive it from their FFL
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cas:
quote:
Originally posted by jimmy123x:
...as long as you're not shipping magazines over 10 rounds to NY with the gun.


^ This.. is incorrect.

Sending the gun without the evil 10+ round magazines... 100% legal.

Sending the gun with the evil 10+ round magazines... also 100% legal. (since it's going to an FFL)

If the gun is something that's not legal here... it's still 100% legal for you to ship it to the FFL. NY's dumb laws do not apply to FFL's.

It's pretty common for guys to buy things that aren't legal here (guns and magazines) and to have the dealer make them compliant before they hand it over.

Or:
Sometimes the buyer is LEO exempt.
Sometimes people will have the FFL hold the mags to sell to exempt LEO.
Sometimes the FFL will hold the mags and either the FFL or buyer will sell them online with the FFL shipping them.
Sometimes the buyer will stomp on the mags and have the dealer throw them away. ("I paid for them, they're mine even if I can't keep them, why should someone else make money off something I paid for?")

Please don't make this any more complicated than it need be. I do wish people would stop making up rules and laws that don't exist. It's bad enough we get fucked by the sate, we don't need people who are supposedly on our side doing it too.


You are correct, I will edit my post. The gun and mags could be shipped to NY, the FFL could retain the mags and sell them to LEO or out of state.
 
Posts: 21421 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Non-Miscreant
posted Hide Post
What a stupid place to live.


Unhappy ammo seeker
 
Posts: 18394 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: February 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Selling to a New Yorker

© SIGforum 2024