Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Get my pies outta the oven! |
I was just reading an article about how the UK is going to ban all new gas (and heating oil) boiler installations as soon as 2025 and make people install heat pumps. Are they smoking crack? The UK’s climate is way too cold IMO for heat pumps! There’s a reason they just aren’t popular or widespread here in the Northeastern US, it just gets too cold here for them to be worthwhile. The entire thing sounds like it’s in disarray though, they are finding that the average UK home doesn’t have enough of an electrical infrastructure for a heat pump, and they just do not have enough qualified installers. The whole thing may end up getting scrapped which would be a win for consumers there as they will see their electric bills going insanely high if those heat pumps are running on backup electric heat all the time. Stupid Green policies This message has been edited. Last edited by: PASig, | ||
|
Left-Handed, NOT Left-Winged! |
The west is going to drive itself into bankruptcy with this idiocy. And China is going to keep using coal, oil, and gas. Why people can't see that they are being played to destroy their economies for China's benefit is incomprehensible to me. | |||
|
His diet consists of black coffee, and sarcasm. |
I've heard this about California and New York as well. Most of CA isn't that cold, but NY certainly is. But at least it only applies to newly constructed homes, in which the wiring would be designed for the heat pumps.
Are you saying owners of existing homes will also be forced to do this? And the electricity will still be generated by fossil fuels anyway. | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
They're nuts and people are going to find out just how bad heat pumps are in that climate After going back and forth on the dates for quite some time, the UK government has now confirmed that gas boilers will be banned from new housing in 2025, and households will no longer be able to buy gas boilers from 2035. | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
I just caught a radio interview with a British Conservative radio show host and he mentioned the controversy over this heat pump mandate. It didn't sound like there was much support for this. | |||
|
Member |
It wasn’t that many years ago that gas was touted as the solution. Remember all the busses and cars that were converted to gas, with there even being tax credits for their purchase? It is only a matter of time before the powers that be condemn those shiny new heat pumps also. They’ll point out how with gas boilers, the U.K. only used energy in the winter, but with heat pumps, Britons have now developed a taste for AC, so they now also consume energy in the summer. At least the British lack-of-window-screen problem will be solved. It’s just like when Green policy effectively killed the nuclear industry. They think they’re doing good, but end up making things worse. Demand not that events should happen as you wish; but wish them to happen as they do happen, and you will go on well. -Epictetus | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
The whole thing is ludicrous the more I read about it. So they want to get the average British citizen off EEEEVVVILLLL natural gas and to a lesser extent heating oil for the ones still using that. Then they turn around and admit that the electricity they will use to run their heat pumps is generated mainly by natural gas from Russia and Norway. Wait until these poor people start getting double and triple electric bills because these stupid heat pumps will not function in that climate and they will end up running on electric heat most of the time. | |||
|
Member |
Just how cold does it get in the UK? | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
It can get quite cold there, I'm not so certain that heat pumps are going to really work there even with the advances they have made in recent years. I found this article and have bolded some of the sections that jump out at me:
Link | |||
|
Member |
Heat pumps there will run continuously, thus wearing out the equipment sooner and their electric bills will be outrageous. Ridiculous. ——————————————— The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1 | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
Yep The gist of the article I posted there was that Brits will be forced to stop heating their homes and water with the CHEAPEST energy source they have there (Natural Gas) and will instead be forced to pay some of the highest electric rates in all of Europe instead. All for the "Green" cause. | |||
|
Member |
The stupidity of the enviro-Left knows no bounds. Out here in Calif, natural gas is being banned from all new home builds in various communities to include no surprise SF but Seattle, Denver, NYC, etc. The enviros have determined that natural gas in homes is a contributor to 'climate change' and must be addressed. What they fail to address is, if electricity is the replacement where's the efforts to modernize and bolster the electrical system; we've had downed electrical lines cause massive fires, where's the effort to bury the lines? We've had a variety of rolling power-outages for over a decade, its become more pronounced over the last 5-years as these power-outages have affected more people in the suburbs and some metro areas. No issue for the Greens though, must move full-speed ahead with these bans/restrictions/limitations, lets put the cart before the horse and we'll figure out the consequences later. Two steps forward and two-steps back, onward progress! | |||
|
Member |
The natural gas wells in our area do not supply gas to our homes where it could be converted to heat at around 96% efficiency. Instead most is piped to power plants to generate electricity at 40-60% efficient. (Or to the coast where it is exported to Europe and China). How does either of these make sense? President Jimmy Carter was right we need to save natural gas for home heating, not burning it up to make electricity. In the interest of "green energy" Drax (England) quit burning coal and is now the worlds largest wood burning power plant. Deforesting pristine acreage in Canada and transporting the wood to England to be burned of course being greener than burning local coal. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/e...oss-canadian-forests No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride. | |||
|
Void Where Prohibited |
I read an article the other day that the world environment wackos are going to go after gas stoves because they put out the equivalent amount of CO2 as something like 16 million cars. "If Gun Control worked, Chicago would look like Mayberry, not Thunderdome" - Cam Edwards | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
For chrissakes, CO2 is not a pollutant! ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
Member |
Bingo ——————————————— The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1 | |||
|
Void Where Prohibited |
Any intelligent person knows that, but it is to the leftists. "If Gun Control worked, Chicago would look like Mayberry, not Thunderdome" - Cam Edwards | |||
|
Member |
Did you know that our leftist energy department DOE has banned the word "coal"? Honest to God, coal is now only to be referred to as "carbon ore". No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride. | |||
|
Big Stack |
As far as heat pumps not being usable in cold climates, I think this is out of date information. I hear that they're being used in Canada, if that tells you anything about their applicability in cold climates. The old story is that they needed resistance heating backup for when it became too cold to actually get the heat pump to work. However technology has progressed, and air sourced heat pumps can work to much lower outside temperatures. https://www.nrel.gov/news/feat...-us-mass-market.html | |||
|
Member |
Heat pumps are not ideal in all climates, but there's a factor you're missing from an efficiency standpoint. A direct-heat home furnace, whether gas or electric, turns its input energy directly into heat - so the theoretical maximum amount of heat it can put out is 100% of the energy put in. So looking at overall efficiency, a gas furnace can heat a house with maybe 95% of the energy in the gas that is burned. An electric furnace using power from a 50% efficiency gas powerplant can heat a house with close to 50% of the energy in the gas that was burned in the powerplant. A heat pump works differently. It doesn't turn its energy input into heat. It uses its energy input to move heat from one place to another. A high efficiency heat pump can put 4-5 times as much heat into a house as it uses electricity. A high efficiency electric heat pump using power from a 50% efficiency gas powerplant can heat a house with 200% or more of the energy in the gas that was burned in the powerplant.
There's no "going to" about it, as mentioned by corsair above, a number of US municipalities have already enacted total bans on any and all natural gas service to new construction homes. As far as I know, none of actually taken effect yet, but they have been passed. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |