SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Article: "Inside America’s Aging Nuclear Missile Submarines"
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Article: "Inside America’s Aging Nuclear Missile Submarines" Login/Join 
Member
posted
https://breakingdefense.com/20...Early%20Bird%20Brief

I got a tour of a fast attack in San Diego 40+ years ago thanks to a Navy pal. I've never seen or been near a boomer.
 
Posts: 15910 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As the article points out, the COLUMBIA class SSBN is DOD's #1 acquisition priority. But, it is not just the SSBN component of the strategic triad that needs replaced.




Speed is fine, but accuracy is final

The use of the pen is an indulgence we can afford only because better men and women grip the sword on our behalf -Ralph Peters
 
Posts: 223 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: July 31, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
Yeah, new boomers and missiles are gonna be 'spensive.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Takes a special breed to do that kind of work. Thanks to all of them for their service.
 
Posts: 958 | Registered: October 07, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Run Silent
Run Deep

Picture of Patriot
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sigmund:
I got a tour of a fast attack in San Diego 40+ years ago thanks to a Navy pal. I've never seen or been near a boomer.


I toured one too...it lasted 8 years.

I finally found my way out....

Big Grin


_____________________________
Pledge allegiance or pack your bag!
The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
Spread my work ethic, not my wealth
 
Posts: 6991 | Location: South East, Pa | Registered: July 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
Odd that they are going back to 16 missiles (Ohios have 24) but will be as big as an Ohio. I thought we would have been able to miniaturize. . .



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21853 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
3-kts to nowhere Wink
 
Posts: 14689 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Live Slow,
Die Whenever
Picture of medic451
posted Hide Post
The Navy has wasted so much time and money on the LCS and Zumwalt class Destroyer, its borderline criminal. This is the result of decades of piss-poor leadership from the DOD and the Navy.



"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them."
- John Wayne in "The Shootist"
 
Posts: 3453 | Location: California | Registered: May 31, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Never underestimate the ability of the US government to waste time any money. Needed items will not be funded, unneeded items will be grossly overfunded. Other people's money is easy to spend.
 
Posts: 1808 | Location: Spokane, WA | Registered: June 23, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
Of course, they could design a submersible barge with 100 missiles on it and submerge it in Lake Superior.* No countermeasures. No torpedo tubes. No $50 billion sonar system. No horrendously expensive quieting technology.

No Soviet sub would get within 1000 miles of the thing, and it wouldn't matter how loud it was or what defensive weapons it had. It would be un-targetable, and therefore, invincible.

But it's cool to cruise at 20+ knots in a $20 gazillion boat, I guess. . .



* I recall some treaty between the US and Canada about warships in the Great Lakes, but of course, they could change that if they really wanted to.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21853 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The success of a solution usually depends upon your point of view
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hound Dog:
Of course, they could design a submersible barge with 100 missiles on it and submerge it in Lake Superior.* No countermeasures. No torpedo tubes. No $50 billion sonar system. No horrendously expensive quieting technology.

No Soviet sub would get within 1000 miles of the thing, and it wouldn't matter how loud it was or what defensive weapons it had. It would be un-targetable, and therefore, invincible.

But it's cool to cruise at 20+ knots in a $20 gazillion boat, I guess. . .



* I recall some treaty between the US and Canada about warships in the Great Lakes, but of course, they could change that if they really wanted to.


Sure but in the context of nuclear warfare Lake Superior is a relatively small area to target compared to ... let’s say ... anywhere in the oceans.

My son is on a boomer and while I’m proud of him I’m glad I did my time on the surface (or as he calls it “the roof”).



“We truly live in a wondrous age of stupid.” - 83v45magna

"I think it's important that people understand free speech doesn't mean free from consequences societally or politically or culturally."
-Pranjit Kalita, founder and CIO of Birkoa Capital Management

 
Posts: 3854 | Location: Jacksonville, FL | Registered: September 10, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SpinZone:

Sure but in the context of nuclear warfare Lake Superior is a relatively small area to target compared to ... let’s say ... anywhere in the oceans.


Yeah, the oceans are vast, but the subs there are vulnerable to enemy attack. A boat in Lake Superior is immune from attack, for all practical purposes. The lake is roughly the size of Ohio, and even the Soviets couldn't carpet bomb the entire lake. . . The cost benefits of not having to have all the quieting and defensive gear outweigh the lack of mobility, IMO (Trident missiles have MUCH longer range than first-generation Polaris missiles that required the boats get closer to their targets).

Of course, they will NEVER do the 'noisy barge in a lake' plan. Navy isn't capable of thinking THAT far outside the box.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21853 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Article: "Inside America’s Aging Nuclear Missile Submarines"

© SIGforum 2024