SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Bump Stock - never heard of them until now
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bump Stock - never heard of them until now Login/Join 
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sns3guppy:

No one is talking about the fact that this shooting, like all others, occurred in "gun free zones." The concert venue and the hotel were both "gun free zones." Clark Country, NV, has draconian firearm laws, requires registration, and much tighter restrictions on firearm ownership, use, and carry than the rest of the state of Nevada. None of that did a thing to impact the ability or will of the shooter, who was already in violation of numerous laws.



The hotel is a gun free zone? Since when? I carry whenever I'm in vegas, including in the casinos and into my hotel.

And I don't think that this loser broke a single law until he actually started shooting people.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 31298 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
Everyone is going to have their point of view, and I can respect that so no need of me to convince anyone of anything. Just sharing in the discussion. I know all about Jerry and probably others that can pull triggers quickly but it is a moot point because even the superhumans have to take a break after a short while. The reason full auto exists is to allow the rifle to mechanically discharge as fast as possible with a single pull of the trigger. The devices in question are simply an additional mechanical component to achieve the same result.

I don't agree with mag limits, assault weapon bans or any of the other nonsense that is normally pedaled by the gun control crowd. Never have, never will. But I do not have a strict libertarian view when it comes to these specific devices that purposefully accomplish the same result as pressing and holding a trigger on a rifle with a "traditional" full auto mechanism which are already regulated.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
I don't agree with mag limits, assault weapon bans or any of the other nonsense that is normally pedaled by the gun control crowd. Never have, never will.
But this is different, right? Because you're taking the "common sense" approach to gun control.

That is what you're saying- that you support "common sense gun control". This means ignoring the laws as they exist, and declaring your personal opinion to be the more sensible approach.

That's what antis do, man. You might want to wake up.

Do it for the children
 
Posts: 110838 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Joy Maker
Picture of airsoft guy
posted Hide Post
Shooting fast is okay, but not if you use some gizmo, which is what made this shooting so deadly, because he could use the gizmo to shoot fast, if he didn't have the gizmo he would have shot fast with just his finger, and that would have made it less deadly, even though he could fire just as fast, sans gizmo, so the gizmos should be banned, but shooting fast is still okay...

Can I buy some pot from you?



quote:
Originally posted by Will938:
If you don't become a screen writer for comedy movies, then you're an asshole.
 
Posts: 17174 | Location: Washington State | Registered: April 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
Everyone is going to have their point of view, and I can respect that so no need of me to convince anyone of anything. Just sharing in the discussion. I know all about Jerry and probably others that can pull triggers quickly but it is a moot point because even the superhumans have to take a break after a short while. The reason full auto exists is to allow the rifle to mechanically discharge as fast as possible with a single pull of the trigger. The devices in question are simply an additional mechanical component to achieve the same result.

I don't agree with mag limits, assault weapon bans or any of the other nonsense that is normally pedaled by the gun control crowd. Never have, never will. But I do not have a strict libertarian view when it comes to these specific devices that purposefully accomplish the same result as pressing and holding a trigger on a rifle with a "traditional" full auto mechanism which are already regulated.

So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Q






 
Posts: 28760 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
You know, there are guys who have been practicing prolonged fast shooting for years without tiring. We need to regulate how much they can practice. Yeah, that's it. That'll cut down on how deadly they could be.


Q






 
Posts: 28760 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Mensch
Picture of kz1000
posted Hide Post
I think they are ridiculous, but who am I to say someone can't own one?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Yidn, shreibt un fershreibt"

"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind."
-Bomber Harris
 
Posts: 16178 | Location: Ivorydale | Registered: January 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Essentially yes.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm Fine
Picture of SBrooks
posted Hide Post
I just watched a video of Jerry shooting a mag beside a man with a bumpfire stock and they both had the same speed (only Jerry was more accurate/had a tighter group).

I kinda doubt he'd "get tired" after 10 minutes of shooting.

So how does your new law deal with this ? I doubt Jerry M. is the only guy who can accomplish this...


------------------
SBrooks
 
Posts: 3797 | Location: East Tennessee | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Essentially yes.

Ok, so you base your decision on this issue on emotion. Ok. Nothing else needs said here.


Q






 
Posts: 28760 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

The hotel is a gun free zone? Since when? I carry whenever I'm in vegas, including in the casinos and into my hotel.

And I don't think that this loser broke a single law until he actually started shooting people.


I have yet to see a casino that isn't posted for firearms, in Nevada. Nevada state law doesn't prohibit the carry of a firearm in a casino, but does prohibit it where the property owner has posted no firearms allowed. Casinos are private property.

The shooter was in violation of casino policy and by default, Nevada law.
 
Posts: 6650 | Registered: September 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
The reason full auto exists is to allow the rifle to mechanically discharge as fast as possible with a single pull of the trigger. The devices in question are simply an additional mechanical component to achieve the same result.


Incorrect. A bump fire stock does not allow more than one bullet to be discharged with a single pull of the trigger. Every time a round is discharged with a bump stock the trigger is pulled. When a firearm is "bump fired" the shooters trigger finger impinges on the trigger EVERY SINGLE TIME. Hence, a bump fire stock does not make a semi-automatic rifle into an automatic one. That is based on both the LEGAL and TECHNICAL definitions of semi and full automatic. The RATE at which bullets are discharged is absolutely immaterial. If the definition of "semi" hinges on rate, they will all be banned in short order.

Do you realize it is possible to bump fire WITHOUT a toy stock? So now what should we ban? If you guessed semi-automatic firearms, you are correct.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted Hide Post
Dtech has lost his his flipping mind.

You have an infection of the mind, sir, a cancerous tumah of gun control notions.

You sound EXACTLY like an anti gun maroon right now.

Please let it go, you and any other do-gooder who thinks there is ANY value or use in regulation of such things. What an absurdly foolish notion in every conceivable regard.
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
Let's take it easy, please. Dtech is answering honestly and calmly. Let's reciprocate.
 
Posts: 110838 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Essentially yes.

Ok, so you base your decision on this issue on emotion. Ok. Nothing else needs said here.


Not an emotional perspective at all. I understand some people want to take a stand regarding the technical definition of what constitutes a full auto but it doesn't change the truth of the similarity of the end result with these devices.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Rubber bands should be NFA restricted items, too.


Q






 
Posts: 28760 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Joy Maker
Picture of airsoft guy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Essentially yes.

Ok, so you base your decision on this issue on emotion. Ok. Nothing else needs said here.


Not an emotional perspective at all. I understand some people want to take a stand regarding the technical definition of what constitutes a full auto but it doesn't change the truth of the similarity of the end result with these devices.


What's the difference between the gizmo, and my finger, besides several hundred dollars?



quote:
Originally posted by Will938:
If you don't become a screen writer for comedy movies, then you're an asshole.
 
Posts: 17174 | Location: Washington State | Registered: April 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Mensch
Picture of kz1000
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
Rubber bands should be NFA restricted items, too.



Yeah, they'll put your eye out...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Yidn, shreibt un fershreibt"

"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind."
-Bomber Harris
 
Posts: 16178 | Location: Ivorydale | Registered: January 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
A semi auto can be bump fired without any special stock. How should we legislate against that?

I would love to hear an answer.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, are you in the camp that disagrees with everything about the NFA, except full auto? And, you think the bumpfire devices should be NFA restricted items?


Essentially yes.

Ok, so you base your decision on this issue on emotion. Ok. Nothing else needs said here.


Not an emotional perspective at all. I understand some people want to take a stand regarding the technical definition of what constitutes a full auto but it doesn't change the truth of the similarity of the end result with these devices.

So, how are you going to regulate folks who can do exactly what these devices do with their fingers? And, you're very naive, if you think there are not many who can do it.

Ans, should rubber bands be NFA restricted?


Q






 
Posts: 28760 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Bump Stock - never heard of them until now

© SIGforum 2025