SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Bump Stock - never heard of them until now
Page 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bump Stock - never heard of them until now Login/Join 
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
Amen.

Dtech, you stated the end result of death and injury were due to the bump stock and I'm calling BS. The end result were the direct result of the man taking things which are legal to do illegal and depraved actions.

He also ate food, and drank liquids, likely wiped his ass with toilet paper, had about a hundred pounds of tannerite, a several thousand pound car a ohone and a pen.

He could have caused tens of times of deaths had he done things differently.

It is not that he did not have motivation, inclination and the wherewithal to do so, he simply chose this method.

Stop with the bump fire bullshit being anything relevant to any of the incident.

It is only an issue with the leftests, because it becomes a lynch-pin for them.

First object that can get a grip on and take away, will be followed to the next.

So, to shorten it, the "bump-stock bone is connected to the... ... ... ... ... musket bone", all the ellipses being everything in between.

Screw those who seek to infringe.

Not a damned inch more, ever.


If you want, surrender yer shit to the nearest PD, but leave me and my 2nd the fuck alone.

sigmonkey- out.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44962 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I have not yet begun
to procrastinate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Bump away. Good grief! Mechanical...mechanical devices!

The ONLY mechanical device needed is a semiauto. People bump fire pistols and rifles with NO mechanical devices.
If you trust DiFi and Schumer and all the other squishy politicos to stop there, you will have disappointment in your (our) future.

Fire at will...I'm done.


--------
After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box.
 
Posts: 3935 | Location: Central AZ | Registered: October 26, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
Regardless of what I believe or anyone else believes one way or the other, does anyone here really believe that given everything that has already been plastered on the TV, the commentary by even legislators on the right and the NRA, and everything on social media and all over the Internet about the bump stocks, that they are actually not going to get regulated in some way when everything is said and done? If you do, I've got a nice piece of swamp land to sell you down here in the Everglades.

The best we can be doing at this point in time is shoring up our arguments as to why nothing else need be restricted, and rightly so as no further restrictions are warranted or necessary.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
I literally had to laugh out loud at this response. No it's not. Please read my prior posts. They are not going to ban your finger or your belt loop. Bump away. Good grief! Mechanical...mechanical devices! It's almost like some of you are trying to give the opposition misinformation to argue against every semi-auto in order to save bump stocks.




They aren't scared of our bump stocks. They're scared of our rifles. Any inch in that climb to ban the rifles must be fought for and against by both sides. Have... have you not been around this country much the last... oh, forty years or so? Eek


______________________________________________
Endeavoring to master the subtle art of the grapefruit spoon.
 
Posts: 17989 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
Sigmonkey...I only said the bump stocks contributed to the rate of fire which contributed to the number of casualties. We all know the evil individual is ultimately at fault here.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ethics, antics,
and ballistics
Picture of Dtech
posted Hide Post
I've posted lengthy posts in the thread explaining genuine thoughts, concerns, opinions, and facts. Please feel free to kindly review those. It is sometimes difficult to carry on a conversation with so many people when some come in in the middle or towards the end without looking at what has already been posted. I will gracefully bow out of this conversation at this time and wish everyone well.


-Dtech
__________________________

"I've got a life to live, people to love, and a God to serve!" - sigmonkey

"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value." - Albert Einstein

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition" ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 4417 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: April 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
There's nothing you could have possibly said beyond the number of posts I've read that could convince me of other than you being completely wrong here.


______________________________________________
Endeavoring to master the subtle art of the grapefruit spoon.
 
Posts: 17989 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
RATE OF FIRE!

Is meaningless. It means nothing. I said I would not respond anymore but I did.

Guys are worried about rate of fire. It means nothing. Sound means nothing.

Technically and legally this mad mans firearm was legal.

It you want to ban this because of sound, or rate of fire, kiss my ass.

It is a LEGAL semiautomatic firearm. You want to arrest me for hooking my finger in a beltloop? Try. You want to label me a felon because my finger moves faster then yours? Come get me.

You are no better than the hardcore banners. You disgust me.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mbinky:
I said I would not respond anymore but I did.
Well, it happens.
 
Posts: 110851 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
quote:
Originally posted by mbinky:
I said I would not respond anymore but I did.
Well, it happens.


Sometimes dicipline breaks down and I apologize.

I just get mad.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
Sigmonkey...I only said the bump stocks contributed to the rate of fire which contributed to the number of casualties. We all know the evil individual is ultimately at fault here.


There would have been no "rate of fire" if the dirtbag did not choose to murder people.

That is the only fucking thing that matters in the argument.

And this will be my response to any and all anti- arguments.

Be they from those in the camp of my enemy, or my own.

Whether anyone "goes after them or not" is irrelevant to this, you brought this issue up here as if it is no big deal to "lose bump stock or other mechanical devices".

But the next thing will be the "autoloading" of the next round after a round is fired, or the making of semi-auto require operating the charging handle after each round, in the manner of a bolt action style rifle.

You think that is not a clear and possible path?

Think about that, before you engage me in any debates on this topic.

I got no room in my life to suffer it, except to make clear I will not move for anyone on it.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44962 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 110851 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted Hide Post
I understand your position fine. I simply find it wrong, dangerous, and unnecessary, and your point of view (on this) is taken as a direct affront to the Rights of myself and others.

Further, I despise Security Theatre and Feel Good Legislation, on top of considering it appalling to even consider sacrificing even more Rights, even one millimeter at a time.

Nothing else matters enough to change this. Not even 10 similar tragedies. Why? Not because I'm cold or heartless, but because I don't misplace the blame nor bend over.

And I would never willfully concede such a thing, as a matter of principle, anyway.

Nothing personal, beyond this topic.

Sure, it may be inevitable or simply likely - but not with my support.
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sig Forum Smart-Ass
Picture of Rotndad
posted Hide Post
I disucseed the possible banning of these bumpfires stocks with a co-worker. He is gun owner and otherwise like minded about the 2nd amendment as most of us here. What I explained to him is that the Los Vegas shooter broke the LAW when he committed MURDER. No other laws matter and no other laws, whether current or future, would've mattered in the damdest. I further explained that this guy was a pilot and owned several airplanes. If this whack-a-doodle had loaded up his airplane with gas cans full of gasoline and diesel and nosed dived into the crowd many more people would've been killed or injuried. Yet we wouldn't be talking about banning airplanes or gas cans.

Why is it that when someone kills people by drinking and driving "we" don't protest the cars but the driver?





Dripping water hollows out stone, not through force, but through persistence.
-Ovid

NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor
 
Posts: 10192 | Location: Land O Lakes, FLA | Registered: June 18, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rotndad:
I disucseed the possible banning of these bumpfires stocks with a co-worker. He is gun owner and otherwise like minded about the 2nd amendment as most of us here. What I explained to him is that the Los Vegas shooter broke the LAW when he committed MURDER. No other laws matter and no other laws, whether current or future, would've mattered in the damdest. I further explained that this guy was a pilot and owned several airplanes. If this whack-a-doodle had loaded up his airplane with gas cans full of gasoline and diesel and nosed dived into the crowd many more people would've been killed or injuried. Yet we wouldn't be talking about banning airplanes or gas cans.

Why is it that when someone kills people by drinking and driving "we" don't protest the cars but the driver?


Well, killing people with airplanes is exactly what the Taliban did on 9-11, thousands of people, and not once did I see any of the news talk about banning airplanes.

Mcvay killed a bunch of people with Fertilizer. It's not the bumpstock, it's the mad man that chose to murder a bunch of innocent people.
 
Posts: 21441 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 911Boss:
quote:
Originally posted by wishfull thinker:
911boss said
quote:
hard pressed to get 100 such rounds off in the 10-11 minutes


100/Rds / 10 minutes = 10 rds a minute or 5 rds every 30 seconds or one rd every every 6 secs.

Ignorance or not, a blind lady with the hiccups could put that on a parking lot.

Parsing aside, I don't agree with you that the prime-mover here was the bump stock. It was the same thing on the ground as it was on the gun, a novelty.

At any rate, wish me some bliss too and I'll be moving on. Cool



You seem to have selectively missed the parts where I said:

...selecting individual targets to aim and fire placed rounds would be hard pressed to get 100 such rounds off in the 10-11 minutes he was shooting.“


And:

”Indiscriminate rapid semi-auto fire might get off a few hundred rounds in that time...”


Reading is fundamental...


How do you figure? A person can easily shoot a placed round every 5 seconds with that many people standing in a crowd, 12 placed rounds per minute, 10 minutes =120 rounds.
 
Posts: 21441 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
...I bet Jerry's trigger wasn't exactly "Mil-spec" either. Wink


quote:
Originally posted by Dtech:
I literally had to laugh out loud at this response. No it's not. Please read my prior posts. They are not going to ban your finger or your belt loop. Bump away. Good grief! Mechanical...mechanical devices! It's almost like some of you are trying to give the opposition misinformation to argue against every semi-auto in order to save bump stocks.


Following your arguement, Jerry's trigger, a mechanical device, has likely been modified from mil-spec and allows him to pull it faster than a mil-spec trigger and thus increase the rate of fire.

How is a bump stock a mechanical device and a belt loop isn't?
 
Posts: 12379 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fuimus
posted Hide Post
I'm content with the right to own firearms. Bump stocks and suppressors don't interest me.
 
Posts: 5369 | Location: Ypsilanti Township | Registered: January 20, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdmb03:
I'm content with the right to own firearms. Bump stocks and suppressors don't interest me.
The Rights of the People are not dependent upon what interests you.
 
Posts: 110851 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
Gunbroker just reversed their stance on bump stocks, and lifted the ban. Here's their statement:

quote:

As the public face of internet gun sales, GunBroker.com works closely with the NRA, NSSF, and other industry organizations on matters of public policy. Initial reaction from the industry was that support of bump stocks was PR disaster. However, the industry and NRA have softened their stance and asked regulators and Congress to make a decision as to whether or not these items are legal. As a result we have changed our position to allow the items to be sold as long as they are sold in full compliance with state and local laws.

As a seller you should be aware that bump stocks / slide stocks are not firearms and are almost certainly not protected by the Protection in Lawful Commerce of Arms Act (PLCAA). This means that if you choose to sell these items and get sued over their use or misuse, you will not have the PLCAA to protect you.

Be aware that bump stocks / slide stocks may not be legal in every state and we have not been able to fully assess what jurisdictions in which they may be outlawed. It would be wise to research the local in state laws into which you intend to ship these items to avoid entering into an illegal transaction.

Thank you,
The Management of GunBroker.com
 
Posts: 33711 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Bump Stock - never heard of them until now

© SIGforum 2025