SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Anybody have experience with Sig Zulu5 binoculars?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Anybody have experience with Sig Zulu5 binoculars? Login/Join 
Crusty old
curmudgeon
Picture of Jimbo54
posted
I just got an email from Sig Sauer offering 50% off of their Zulu5 10x42 binoculars. $239.99, regularly $479.99.

Does anybody have these or tried them? If so how do they perform for you?


I don't really need another pair of field glasses, but they might come in handy when I need a little more length than my Vortex 8x42 glasses.

Jim


________________________

"If you can't be a good example, then you'll have to be a horrible warning" -Catherine Aird
 
Posts: 9791 | Location: The right side of Washington State | Registered: September 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I can't tell if I'm
tired, or just lazy
Picture of ggile
posted Hide Post
I'm rather curious about them also. SIG must really want to sell them because they sent me four emails regarding this offer. Smile


_____________________________

"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"
Benjamin Franklin
 
Posts: 2116 | Location: South Dakota-pheasant country | Registered: June 20, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of UTsig
posted Hide Post
I bought a pair a few months ago, they were on sale then, too. I got the 10x42, mainly for bird/wildlife watching in our yard. They are very clear and seem well made. Just like a lot of other items they are made in China, no way to avoid this in today's world.

We have Pentax, very well liked and ZenRay, wife doesn't like. The Sig got two thumbs up from the wife, she's pretty critical.

My biggest knock on binos is the lens covers retention, the Zulu 5 are not any better than others, worse than some. I find this frustrating, I just leave them in the house when viewing. My Steiner Military/Marine have the best covers of any I own, never fall off and these are probably 30 years old!


________________________________

"Nature scares me" a quote by my friend Bob after a rough day at sea.
 
Posts: 3468 | Location: Utah's Dixie | Registered: January 29, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ggile:
I'm rather curious about them also. SIG must really want to sell them because they sent me four emails regarding this offer. Smile


I got 3 or 4 emails today too.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not all who wander
are lost.
Picture of JohnV
posted Hide Post
I have experience with both the 5’s and the 7’s. I currently own the 7’s that I got for a steal off eBay. They are excellent. Great edge to edge clarity and contrast. Good low light transmission. Comfortable to hold and a velvety smooth focus knob. I find I tend to have to focus them a lot even with small changes in viewing distance but that’s not a big deal to me.

The worst part about them are the objective covers. They are absolute trash. They don’t stay put, they are hard to put on and they will fall off. I can not believe Sig had such a gross oversight on the objective covers. They know they are trash too because if you see their booths at trade shows, none of them have the covers on them. I’ve asked sig a few times if they were planning any upgrades and I’ve never heard from them. The covers are the only thing in my opinion that keeps them from being perfect.

My previous experience has been with Nikon Monarch 5’s. The Sigs blow them out of the water in all viewing categories. I use binoculars a lot during hunting season and I use the 8x’s.





Posted from my iPhone.
 
Posts: 4325 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: February 22, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If the glass on your binos is legit - the lens covers are completely irrelevant.
 
Posts: 4979 | Registered: April 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Crusty old
curmudgeon
Picture of Jimbo54
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Graniteguy:
If the glass on your binos is legit - the lens covers are completely irrelevant.



That's kind of what I'm thinking. They are water proof and have a lifetime guarantee so Sig is sure they will hold up under harsh conditions. I don't hunt anymore so I don't see that being a problem.

Jim


________________________

"If you can't be a good example, then you'll have to be a horrible warning" -Catherine Aird
 
Posts: 9791 | Location: The right side of Washington State | Registered: September 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Festina Lente
Picture of feersum dreadnaught
posted Hide Post
$226 on Amazon, does not seem to be a huge discount



NRA Life Member - "Fear God and Dreadnaught"
 
Posts: 8295 | Location: in the red zone of the blue state, CT | Registered: October 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green grass and
high tides
Picture of old rugged cross
posted Hide Post
Chicom my guess



"Practice like you want to play in the game"
 
Posts: 19889 | Registered: September 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Crusty old
curmudgeon
Picture of Jimbo54
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by feersum dreadnaught:
$226 on Amazon, does not seem to be a huge discount



The seller on Amazon is Optic Planet. I won't deal with them anymore after a really bad experience trying to buy a scope not long ago.

Jim


________________________

"If you can't be a good example, then you'll have to be a horrible warning" -Catherine Aird
 
Posts: 9791 | Location: The right side of Washington State | Registered: September 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Anybody have experience with Sig Zulu5 binoculars?

© SIGforum 2024