If nothing else, she at least read the writing on the wall. Sayonara you feckless RINO POS.

Go join your uncle Pierre Delecto.

Elise Stefanik she is smart and young. Better choice than Vivek.

Great News!

Thanks Vivek!

She'll be an anchor on CNN by April

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Yes, I believe she will be gone, perhaps before the convention. Much credit belongs to Ramaswamy for bringing the problems with this RINO to the general public, with his remarks at a recent debate.

I agree. It’s pretty sad that an “outsider” has to point out the obvious to get one of the most important moves within the GOP done.

some more details

https://www.breitbart.com/poli...th-carolina-primary/

Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman for the Republican National Committee (RNC), has reportedly told former President Donald Trump that she will step down from her position following the South Carolina primary later this month.

Should Ronna McDaniel follow through on her alleged pledge to leave, the former president will then reportedly promote the chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party, Michael Whatley, as her replacement, according to several sources who spoke with the New York Times. A new election will take place within the committee.

The sources said that Trump prefers Whatley due to the two reportedly aligning with each other on views about the 2020 election being allegedly “stolen.”

“Ms. McDaniel and Mr. Trump met at Mar-a-Lago on Monday. He posted on his social media website, Truth Social, shortly after their meeting, all but declaring that changes are coming,” noted the Times. “In the post, he described her as ‘my friend” and said she was ‘now Head of the RNC, and I’ll be making a decision the day after the South Carolina Primary as to my recommendations for RNC Growth.'”

“Ms. McDaniel had been considering leaving before the end of her term for some time, according to multiple people familiar with the matter,” the Times added. “And despite animosity toward Ms. McDaniel from some of Mr. Trump’s closest allies, he has been uncharacteristically gentle as he has begun to acknowledge her imminent departure in public comments.”

As Breitbart News reported, the RNC’s latest filing with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) showed that it had “just $8 million in cash on hand and was $1.8 million in debt.” McDaniel’s future within the party was also a “central topic of discussion at the RNC meetings in Las Vegas, Nevada, last week.”

“Those meetings were preceded by the Restoring National Conference summit in Las Vegas a week earlier, which was a Turning Point USA event meant to serve as a ‘wakeup call’ to the RNC and McDaniel,” it said. “Many of the 168 party officials from around the country and U.S. territories and 75 prominent Republican county chairs attended the event.”

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Gone

https://twitter.com/RealPatric.../1755032408175354319

AWESOME!!!!!!!

https://www.theblaze.com/news/...s-mccarthy-rnc-chair

After instigating McCarthy ouster last year, Gaetz suggests he'd make 'terrific' RNC chair

GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, who last year successfully moved to oust then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) from the speakership, has suggested that McCarthy would make a good Republican National Committee chair.

"I fully endorse Kevin McCarthy for RNC Chair. Kevin is well organized and a very high-revenue fundraiser. He will also be well-liked by the RNC Committee. The RNC Chair doesn't make any policy decisions, set any agenda, or negotiate against Democrats, ever. Kevin would be terrific," Gaetz tweeted.

"Is there a greater troll in Congress than Matt?" Sebastian Gorka wrote in response to Gaetz's post.
.
.
.
<snip>

quote:

"I fully endorse Kevin McCarthy for RNC Chair. Kevin is well organized and a very high-revenue fundraiser. He will also be well-liked by the RNC Committee. The RNC Chair doesn't make any policy decisions, set any agenda, or negotiate against Democrats, ever. Kevin would be terrific," Gaetz tweeted.

That's great!!
"Is there a greater troll in Congress than Matt?"
Nope.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2...rt-for-duty-1434703/

Lara Trump Vows Largest-Ever Legal 'Ballot Harvesting' Operation If Elected RNC Co-Chair

Authored by Janice Hisle via The Epoch Times
https://www.theepochtimes.com/...rnc-co-chair-5592416

Lara Trump says efforts of “historic” proportions are needed to ensure that Republicans, including her father-in-law, former President Donald Trump, win the Nov. 5 election.

Ms. Trump says she is ready to take on that challenge if she becomes co-chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC), as President Trump has recommended.

In an exclusive interview with The Epoch Times before a Feb. 21 campaign stop, Ms. Trump declared: “We need to have the biggest legal ballot harvesting operation this country has ever seen.”

Ballot harvesting, which is legal in many states, allows people to deliver other voters’ absentee or mail-in ballots to election officials. Some fear this practice facilitates election fraud. Republicans have long frowned upon it; Democrats have taken advantage of it. “Whether or not they [Democrats] do it legally, that’s up for discussion,” Ms. Trump said.

In any case, Ms. Trump says it’s time for Republicans to start “attacking the game differently.”

Ms. Trump’s remarks to The Epoch Times, and later, to supporters, provided new insights about her vision for a revamped and reinvigorated RNC.

“It feels, for a long time, like the Democrats have been playing chess and we’ve been playing checkers,” she said. Her goal is for the Republican Party “to be the opposite, to be steps ahead of them, and on our toes, and ahead of the game, and facing forward the whole time.”

Ms. Trump, the wife of President Trump’s son, Eric, also advocates two other efforts that she says would be unprecedented.

Republicans need to be urged to vote early, not just on election day, as they typically have preferred, she said. She also wants to see the RNC’s program for training poll watchers expanded nationwide.

“They don’t just stand in the background and kind of keep an eye out and look around for things,” Ms. Trump said. “They physically can count how many ballots are coming in, and how many ballots are going out.”

Such measures are needed “to reassure people in a time like we’re in right now, where they really feel like there wasn’t something quite right about the 2020 election, and people still have a lot of unanswered questions,” she said.

Ms. Trump said that the RNC, which is suffering from depleted coffers and anemic fundraising, must restore trust among Republican donors.

“I’ve had family members of mine call me and say, ‘Hey, I just clicked on this to donate to the president ... [and] I think it goes to the RNC, I don’t know if I trust that,’” she said. “That’s a problem.”

Especially since economic conditions are tough for many people right now, “whenever they donate, they think their money is going to support Donald Trump and support other ‘America First’ candidates for House and Senate, and that’s exactly what should happen,” she said.

Ms. Trump said that if she is elected RNC co-chair that would be her biggest role: to ensure that “their money is going to the things that they want to support.”

“Oftentimes,” she said, those donors “want to ensure that Donald Trump is reelected to become the 47th president.”

Action After the Primary?

President Trump endorsed his son’s wife to co-chair the RNC on Feb. 12, after news of RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel’s possible upcoming resignation leaked.

Ms. McDaniel has stated that she would make a decision about her future after the South Carolina GOP primary, which is this Saturday.

If she steps down, President Trump has said he would like to see North Carolina GOP Chair Michael Whatley succeed Ms. McDaniel.

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...elected-rnc-co-chair

While I understand the appeal of the end justifies the means, I really can't condone trying to "out cheat" the Democrats. Yes, I read that she said legal ballot harvesting but I won't believe a single election going forward is legitimate until we go back to in person voting with little to no absentee ballots. Early, in person, voting should allow anyone who wants to vote to vote. Absentee ballots should be reserved for deployed military and very few others.

We will not win a war of trying to out cheat (even legally because they won't stop at legal) the Dems.

quote:

Originally posted by pedropcola:
While I understand the appeal of the end justifies the means, I really can't condone trying to "out cheat" the Democrats. Yes, I read that she said legal ballot harvesting but I won't believe a single election going forward is legitimate until we go back to in person voting with little to no absentee ballots. Early, in person, voting should allow anyone who wants to vote to vote. Absentee ballots should be reserved for deployed military and very few others.

We will not win a war of trying to out cheat (even legally because they won't stop at legal) the Dems.

You have to fight fire with fire here. And NO, we aren't EVER going to win again if we don't start playing their game. This whole "we have to be better than them, we have to be the bigger man" attitude is why we keep losing.

No, let's do this!

The toothpaste is out of the tube IMO on the whole mail in ballot thing and it's not going back in. May as well embrace it and move forward.

quote:

Originally posted by pedropcola:
While I understand the appeal of the end justifies the means, I really can't condone trying to "out cheat" the Democrats. Yes, I read that she said legal ballot harvesting but I won't believe a single election going forward is legitimate until we go back to in person voting with little to no absentee ballots. Early, in person, voting should allow anyone who wants to vote to vote. Absentee ballots should be reserved for deployed military and very few others.

We will not win a war of trying to out cheat (even legally because they won't stop at legal) the Dems.

Absolute loser attitude right here.

We won't change shit if we don't start winning again. And that means playing by the rules set forth by the democrats. Then we can shore up the election process. Until then, by all means necessary.

I see your point but we won't beat the Dem system of cheating. Whatever we could do in ballot harvesting is minor compared to what they can and have done. Plus, the Dems have built in advantages. They can go to poor economic areas with massive (black) density and harvest with little to no effort. Try doing that in a Republican area. Unlikely to work. Plus, if someone came to anyone on this forums door and tried to harvest ballot they might end up getting the bumrush.

You guys are perhaps mishearing me. I have zero issue with fighting dirty. Staying above the fray has never worked. I agree there. I am saying that ballot harvesting is unlikely to be a winning strategy. I think that time and resources could be spent better elsewhere. If you can do both then fine. We aren't out ballot harvesting them for obvious reasons.

Urban environments are the perfect place to ballot harvest. That battleground wildly favors the other side.

We need in person voting, which I know you guys agree with. You guys want ballot harvesting in the meantime, well ok, I don't think it can hurt. I don't think it is a winning strategy but I guess it can't hurt.

quote:

Urban environments are the perfect place to ballot harvest. That battleground wildly favors the other side.

We need in person voting, which I know you guys agree with. You guys want ballot harvesting in the meantime, well ok, I don't think it can hurt. I don't think it is a winning strategy but I guess it can't hurt.

I agree. In person voting, with ID, is the only safe method.

In person voting can be done here during the two weeks before the election for those who cannot make it on election day. That is secure.

Matching signatures, by mail, without the person or an ID is NOT secure.

Sure, play by the rules as they exist as best we can, but if the rules are designed to help the Democrats cheat we aren't going to "beat them at their own game".

We want fair elections decided on election day, not counting mail-in ballots for two weeks after.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

quote:

Originally posted by pedropcola:
While I understand the appeal of the end justifies the means, I really can't condone trying to "out cheat" the Democrats. Yes, I read that she said legal ballot harvesting but I won't believe a single election going forward is legitimate until we go back to in person voting with little to no absentee ballots. Early, in person, voting should allow anyone who wants to vote to vote. Absentee ballots should be reserved for deployed military and very few others.

We will not win a war of trying to out cheat (even legally because they won't stop at legal) the Dems.

You have to fight fire with fire here. And NO, we aren't EVER going to win again if we don't start playing their game. This whole "we have to be better than them, we have to be the bigger man" attitude is why we keep losing.

No, let's do this!

The toothpaste is out of the tube IMO on the whole mail in ballot thing and it's not going back in. May as well embrace it and move forward.

Let's be straight on this: the ballot harvesting that Lara Trump is talking about isn't the same as the ballot harvesting done by the Democrats where outright fraud is committed - the evidence of which is they would go to an old people's home and come out with every ballot for every person there and, surprisingly, they all vote the Democrat ticket.

And the Republicans can't do this because the Democrats are smart enough to catch the Republicans doing this and may even set them up ala January 6.

You guys already know how the election process needs to be fixed such as voter ID, etc.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
I agree. In person voting, with ID, is the only safe method.

In person voting can be done here during the two weeks before the election for those who cannot make it on election day. That is secure.

I know that I'm preaching to the choir here, but every single person who cares to know, knows when election day is and if you can't plan for that then you've got bigger problems. For example, it took me all of 2 seconds to determine that election day 2047 is on November 5th. Knowing full well when that date is there is no reason whatsoever that one cannot get their sorry ass to a voting booth on that day or file absentee for the RARE instance that one is unable to be at their home of record on that day. I firmly believe in the "you snooze you lose" principle. If you're too lazy to get to the booth on election day, too bad, so sad. Obviously it wan't that important to you.

I believe, and have suggested the same to my Representative and Senators, that this needs to be codified in federal law, be it an amendment or something else binding. In person voting only after positive identification on election DAY, and all votes tallied by midnight on that day.

I won't hold my breath.