DMF:

I'm not going to explain it any further. I assumed that the average SIG Forum member kept up with current events to the extent that the purpose of exposing the relationship between a candidate for Governor of Georgia and a known terrorist sympathizer would be obvious.

I don't know where you call home, but it it happens to be Georgia, educate yourself.

RMD

You're the one who told the forum the photo, with no explanation, was what a voter needed to see, to avoid making a mistake in voting.

So again, why can't you explain how the photo is what tells a voter what they need to know?

It seems you should be able to explain it, since you made the choice to post the way you did.

Odd that you can't, or won't, explain why the photo is what "EVERY VOTER in the State of Georgia," can use to determine how to cast a proper vote.

quote:

Originally posted by smschulz:

quote:

Originally posted by DMF:
So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Pretty obvious it that Muslim Terrorist that is always trying to start Jihad here in the US.
I didn't remember her name but I can't forget that cold terrorist face.
I guess if you want to be associated with that then it's OK.

I've known many Muslims, who are not terrorists. Nothing about the photo indicates the woman on the left has any terrorist affiliation.

quote:

Originally posted by DMF:

quote:

Originally posted by smschulz:

quote:

Originally posted by DMF:
So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Pretty obvious it that Muslim Terrorist that is always trying to start Jihad here in the US.
I didn't remember her name but I can't forget that cold terrorist face.
I guess if you want to be associated with that then it's OK.

I've known many Muslims, who are not terrorists. Nothing about the photo indicates the woman on the left has any terrorist affiliation.

Just listen to some of the shit she spews and then you will know the truth.

O.K. I surrender. Here's your God-Damned caption: "Linda Sarsour and left-wing democrat[sic] candidate for governor of Georgia, Stacy Abrams."

"And ye shall be known by the company ye keep."

Happy now?

RMD

She should be in Guantanamo not Georgia.

DMF, when's the last time you got laid, man?

Linda Sarsour is a Muslim and left wing activist that supports Sharia Law and claims to be a feminist too.

Confused?

She seems to be.

And that's just the good stuff.

Back to Stacy Abrams. She is a Democrat "Progressive" true believer so that's pretty much Linda Sarsour, without the burka.

quote:

Originally posted by rduckwor:
DMF:

I'm not going to explain it any further. I assumed that the average SIG Forum member kept up with current events to the extent that the purpose of exposing the relationship between a candidate for Governor of Georgia and a known terrorist sympathizer would be obvious.

I don't know where you call home, but it it happens to be Georgia, educate yourself.

RMD

I wouldn't have a recognized Sarsour's face, so a little explanation of what we were looking at would have helped us understand what is, on its face, an unremarkable photo.

As a not-GA voter, I certainly understood the implication of the thread title as soon as I saw the picture. I recognize Linda Sarsour and know a fair amount about her and her activities. I'm an average person who spends a modicum of my daily life keeping up with politics and the voices on various sides of political and social issues.

DMF just likes to be difficult: he knows goddamn well what something means, but has to be "that guy". He's deliberately obtuse because he's a contrarian.

DMF

You need to go back and read the title of this Thread.

To save you the trouble it reads, "EVERY VOTER in the State of Georgia needs to see this photo."

Now, if you're from Georgia and have been paying even the slightest bit of attention to the upcoming election, no further explanation of the photo should be necessary.

Next, if you're not from Georgia then we really don't need your blithering and carrying on about any of this.

As a new Georgia voter, she will not be getting my vote.

Still working my way through Georgia and North Fulton County politics.

My piano only has eleven keys and a winder on the side, but I understood the post.

.

Georgia conservatives have it uphill both ways.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/ne...rticle216056560.html

670 ballots in a precinct with 276 voters, and other tales from Georgia’s primary

BY CHRISTINE CONDON

ccondon@mcclatchydc.com

LINKEDIN
GOOGLE+
PINTEREST
REDDIT
PRINT
ORDER REPRINT OF THIS STORY
August 06, 2018 04:05 PM

Updated August 06, 2018 04:17 PM

WASHINGTON
Habersham County’s Mud Creek precinct in northeastern Georgia had 276 registered voters ahead of the state’s primary elections in May.

But 670 ballots were cast, according to the Georgia secretary of state’s office, indicating a 243 percent turnout.

The discrepancy, included in a number of sworn statements and exhibits filed as part of a federal lawsuit against the state by election security activists, comes amid swelling public concern for the security of Georgia’s voting systems. Georgia is one of four states that uses voting machines statewide that produce no paper record for voters to verify, making them difficult to audit, experts say.

And cybersecurity experts have warned that there were security flaws on the state election website leading up to the 2016 contest that permitted the download and manipulation of voter information.

Exactly why we NEED voter ID.

We are REQUIRED to have ID to carry a gun that is constitutional right, so there should be no problem with having a fingerprint background check ID to vote.

quote:

Originally posted by Mars_Attacks:
Exactly why we NEED voter ID.

We are REQUIRED to have ID to carry a gun that is constitutional right, so there should be no problem with having a fingerprint background check ID to vote.

You know, everybody understands that except for the democrats[sic].

We all know why they don't understand that too.

Logic has no place when the dead vote.

RMD