EVERY VOTER in the State of Georgia needs to see this photo!

SIGforum

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/320601935/m/7080024544

August 06, 2018, 08:51 PM

rduckwor

EVERY VOTER in the State of Georgia needs to see this photo!

This is what you MIGHT ELECT if you make the wrong choice.

RMD

TL Davis: “The Second Amendment is special, not because it protects guns, but because its violation signals a government with the intention to oppress its people…”
Remember: After the first one, the rest are free.

August 06, 2018, 08:54 PM

AZSigs

Dems #walkaway
Republicans - gather votes and keep liberals out of office.

Getting shot is no achievement. Hitting your enemy is. NRA Endowment Member . NRA instructor

August 06, 2018, 08:57 PM

PowerSurge

I’ll be doing my part to make sure she suffers defeat.

———————————————
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1

August 06, 2018, 09:10 PM

armored

Is Stacey on the left or right?

August 06, 2018, 09:15 PM

12131

quote:
Originally posted by armored:
Is Stacey on the left or right?

Right.

August 06, 2018, 09:25 PM

rduckwor

quote:
Originally posted by armored:
Is Stacey on the left or right?

In the picture, the right. In politics, the left.

RMD

August 06, 2018, 11:09 PM

oddball

quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by armored:
Is Stacey on the left or right?

Right.

And on the "left" is Linda Sarsour, brains behind the Pussy March, BLM supporter and Islamic/Sharia Law advocate, and your basic garden-variety sleazy far left commie.

_{"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965}

August 07, 2018, 12:12 AM

mr kablammo

As Oddball posted, Linda Sarsour; an islamo-supremacist and Judeo-phobe. She posted a selfie taken at the Holocaust museum which was celebratory of the suffering. You can read more about her at jihadwatch.org.

"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye". The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupery, pilot and author, lost on mission, July 1944, Med Theatre.

August 07, 2018, 12:36 AM

corsair

Linda Sarsour - while no one is single-handedly responsible for the fight-the-patriarchy movement, she is a major voice and figure. She's a well known bigot, anti-Semite and apologist for Islam. Given today's standards, she's said enough to get her banished and excommunicated from most social circles yet, she continues to headline speaking engagements and be a resource to major media.

If there was a deck of cards called Enemies From Within, she's the Queen of Spades.

August 07, 2018, 06:22 AM

Edmond

Why doesn't the dumb bitch go live in a utopia like Iran?

_____________

August 07, 2018, 06:40 AM

Bassamatic

Don't know anything about Stacy Abrams. Can she win?

.....never marry a woman who is mean to your waitress.

August 07, 2018, 07:17 AM

Mars_Attacks

quote:
Originally posted by Bassamatic:
Don't know anything about Stacy Abrams. Can she win?

Not a chance.

Only the massive parasite voting block of Atlanta will vote for her.

____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.

August 07, 2018, 07:19 AM

ScreamingCockatoo

This is what the dems want!

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.

August 07, 2018, 07:24 AM

45 Cal

Fulton and Decalb will vote for her,most of the state has good folk with brains.

August 07, 2018, 08:28 AM

DMF

quote:
Originally posted by rduckwor:

This is what you MIGHT ELECT if you make the wrong choice.

RMD

So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Without any context it's merely two women holding a sign for a gubernatorial candidate. The sign has no indication of any agenda, and does not even identify a party. Neither is wearing any clothing that identifies any agenda, or even a party. Anything in the background must be discounted, as it can be directly attributed to either person. Nothing in the photo alone even tells you which, if either, of them is the candidate, although I suppose that it's implied one of them is the candidate, by your statement with the photo in your OP.

You made this about the photo, and therefore about appearances alone. So can you explain what about the photo itself, since it's clear by your thread title and lack of any other detail in your post, that it's all about appearances, tells a voter which of the two women is the candidate, and the candidate is wrong for the State of Georgia. Again, since you defined it that way, it needs to be explained based on what someone can determine just from the photo alone.

Thanks.

___________________________________________
"He was never hindered by any dogma, except the Constitution." - Ty Ross speaking of his grandfather General Barry Goldwater

"War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want." - William Tecumseh Sherman

August 07, 2018, 08:31 AM

flesheatingvirus

quote:
Originally posted by DMF:

So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Without any context it's merely two women holding a sign for a gubernatorial candidate. The sign has no indication of any agenda, and does not even identify a party. Neither is wearing any clothing that identifies any agenda, or even a party. Anything in the background must be discounted, as it can be directly attributed to either person. Nothing in the photo alone even tells you which, if either, of them is the candidate, although I suppose that it's implied one of them is the candidate, by your statement with the photo in your OP.

You made this about the photo, and therefore about appearances alone. So can you explain what about the photo itself, since it's clear by your thread title and lack of any other detail in your post, that it's all about appearances, tells a voter which of the two women is the candidate, and the candidate is wrong for the State of Georgia. Again, since you defined it that way, it needs to be explained based on what someone can determine just from the photo alone.

Thanks.

Agreed. I need a bit more up front than just the picture. Something like this:

quote:
Originally posted by oddball:

And on the "left" is Linda Sarsour, brains behind the Pussy March, BLM supporter and Islamic/Sharia Law advocate, and your basic garden-variety sleazy far left commie.

quote:
Originally posted by mr kablammo:
As Oddball posted, Linda Sarsour; an islamo-supremacist and Judeo-phobe. She posted a selfie taken at the Holocaust museum which was celebratory of the suffering. You can read more about her at jihadwatch.org.

________________________________________

-- Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past me I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. --

August 07, 2018, 08:33 AM

rduckwor

quote:
Originally posted by DMF:
quote:
Originally posted by rduckwor:

This is what you MIGHT ELECT if you make the wrong choice.

RMD
So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Without any context it's merely two women holding a sign for a gubernatorial candidate. The sign has no indication of any agenda, and does not even identify a party. Neither is wearing any clothing that identifies any agenda, or even a party. Anything in the background must be discounted, as it can be directly attributed to either person. Nothing in the photo alone even tells you which, if either, of them is the candidate, although I suppose that's implied by your statement with the photo in your OP.

You made this about the photo, and therefore about appearances alone. So can you explain what about the photo itself, since it's clear by your thread title and lack of any other detail in your post, that it's all about appearances, tells a voter which of the two women is the candidate, and the candidate is wrong for the State of Georgia. Again, since you defined it that way, it needs to be explained based on what someone can determine just from the photo alone.

Thanks.

Clearly you know nothing of Linda Sarsour.

Read Corsair's post just above in this thread.

The candidate is a left wing democrat [sic] who is a willing to associate herself with a radical islamist [sic] and believes this will endear her to the voters.

Wake up and smell the coffee. The left would be very happy to have us become Europe.

RMD

August 07, 2018, 08:34 AM

parabellum

he he

They need more info

Move to Georgia and you'll know everything you need to know.

____________________________________________________

"I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023

August 07, 2018, 08:45 AM

DMF

quote:
Originally posted by rduckwor:
quote:
Originally posted by DMF:
quote:
Originally posted by rduckwor:

This is what you MIGHT ELECT if you make the wrong choice.

RMD
So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Without any context it's merely two women holding a sign for a gubernatorial candidate. The sign has no indication of any agenda, and does not even identify a party. Neither is wearing any clothing that identifies any agenda, or even a party. Anything in the background must be discounted, as it can be directly attributed to either person. Nothing in the photo alone even tells you which, if either, of them is the candidate, although I suppose that's implied by your statement with the photo in your OP.

You made this about the photo, and therefore about appearances alone. So can you explain what about the photo itself, since it's clear by your thread title and lack of any other detail in your post, that it's all about appearances, tells a voter which of the two women is the candidate, and the candidate is wrong for the State of Georgia. Again, since you defined it that way, it needs to be explained based on what someone can determine just from the photo alone.

Thanks.

Clearly you know nothing of Linda Sarsour.

Read Corsair's post just above in this thread.

The candidate is a left wing democrat [sic] who is a willing to associate herself with a radical islamist [sic] and believes this will endear her to the voters.

Wake up and smell the coffee. The left would be very happy to have us become Europe.

RMD

I know a little, but you made it all about the photo. Your explanation is not about how the PHOTO tells us anything about the candidate. Corsair's post is not about the content of the photo, and how the photo gives a Georgia voter the necessary information.

Again, you made it about the photo alone, and the photo alone does not provide the information needed to make a decision about a candidate. However, if I'm wrong about that explain how the photo itself, without any explanation, because that's how your framed it with your title and OP, gives a voter the necessary information about the gubernatorial candidate, or even shows who, if anyone, in the photo is the candidate.

As parabellum says, someone needs "more info," than what is merely shown in the photo. However, you disagree based on how you started this thread, so explain how the photo negates the need for "more info."

Thanks.

August 07, 2018, 08:48 AM

smschulz

quote:
Originally posted by DMF:
So what about the photo itself, shows the candidate in a negative light?

Pretty obvious it that Muslim Terrorist that is always trying to start Jihad here in the US.
I didn't remember her name but I can't forget that cold terrorist face.
I guess if you want to be associated with that then it's OK.