https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3VZjuttZbQ

I unsubed from WSJ's youtube channel after watching this video. Might be shocked to learn, no opposing views in the video. The libs love to pull at the heart strings, don't they? No thought given to the demolishing of the Bill of Rights either, it appears.

I cancelled my WSJ online subscription in January precisely because this kind of crap is becoming their stock in trade.

If I knew these parents I'm sure I would feel sorrow for their loss. As it is, it's one more anonymous tragedy massaged to fit a narrative suiting their agenda. I'm not inserting all the arguments, you all know them better than I. I'm saying though that they are pandering to a preexisting audience and I hope their fantasy makes them feel better.

The WSJ though can eat a bag of dicks for facilitating their effort to take their grief to a political level.

+1

I was considering an online sub to their “news paper” but no more.

This is perfectly acceptable, nothing wrong at all with it.

Meanwhile...

Should someone from our side do a similar thing, have a kid killed at a shooting say they wished their teacher were armed, or have someone who dutifully obeyed a Gun Free Zone sign wish they'd ignored it and brought their gun in, we'd be called ghouls.

I have been very pleased with my online subscription. The views are generally conservative and in line with my thinking. I assume this is an Opinion piece. Besides what is the alternative?? Post? New York times?

The other option is to stop supporting all corporate media. Let them starve.

The WSJ actually printed something newsworthy—the Left revealing themselves to be ghouls with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
I see no difference morally between this and AI-generated online porn of Taylor Swift.

One of the things I appreciate about WSJ is that they print the occasional ‘opposing view’. If the more liberal outlets did this, we might actually a more balanced main-stream-media.