SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    BATFE reversal of reversal of Open Letter on Shouldering SIG-style Brace
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
BATFE reversal of reversal of Open Letter on Shouldering SIG-style Brace Login/Join 
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted
Around and 'round and 'round like a bloody merry go round.

Note: no copy of the BATFE reversal was provided by SB Tactical.

quote:
PRESS RELEASE: SB Tactical™ Announces Reversal of ATF Open Letter on the Use of SB Tactical Pistol Stabilizing Braces®

Saint Petersburg, Fla. (April, 25, 2017) – SB Tactical™, inventors and manufacturers of the Pistol Stabilizing Brace®, is excited to announce that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE) has issued SB Tactical a reversal letter containing a sensible clarification of the Bureau’s position on the lawful use of SB Tactical braces.

The new clarification of opinion letter states, “an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not reconfigured for use as a shoulder stock – even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder. To the extent that the January 2015 Open Letter implied or has been construed to hold that incidental, sporadic, or situational “use” of an arm-brace (in its original approved configuration) equipped firearm from a firing position at or near the shoulder was sufficient to constitute “redesign,” such interpretations are incorrect and not consistent with ATF’s interpretation of the statute or the manner in which it has historically been enforced.”

ROSAL


If this is in the wrong subforum, please move it.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32370 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Safe for at least the next 4 years, eh?


Q






 
Posts: 28197 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
"[I]ncidental, sporadic and situational 'use'" - I get what incidental and sporadic mean, but what exactly are they saying is a "situational" use?

What would constitute sufficient evidence to prove that someone always used the brace as a shoulder stock and had therefore magically turned the pistol into an SBR?
 
Posts: 27313 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
"[I]ncidental, sporadic and situational 'use'" - I get what incidental and sporadic mean, but what exactly are they saying is a "situational" use?

What would constitute sufficient evidence to prove that someone always used the brace as a shoulder stock and had therefore magically turned the pistol into an SBR?


I have no idea.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32370 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Do the next
right thing
Picture of bobtheelf
posted Hide Post
Maybe it's time for an AR pistol after all.
 
Posts: 3684 | Location: Nashville | Registered: July 23, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CQB60
posted Hide Post
Add ATF to the list of government agencies that need to be disolved. wankers the lot of them!


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
 
Posts: 13872 | Location: VIrtual | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
JOIN, or DIE
posted Hide Post
There was a time when I wasn't sure about how I felt about when people would call for the ATF to be disbanded. Extreme I thought. As time has gone by and I have learned more, my feeling have changed. Disband them. This pistol brace touching your shoulder crap is just one thing in a long line of things they have gotten wrong. It actually disgusts me seeing videos of grown men on youtube shooting with the damn thing on their cheek and other places, succumbing to the fear of the ATF coming to snatch them up if the brace touched their shoulder. The fast and furious scandal that nobody was held accountable for, the politicization of the bureau under Obama, the shoulder brace thing, the opinion letters (brace, suppressor wipe), etc. Cut their funding. On top of that, the "white paper" that comes out recently where they even say that the laws on SBR's and suppressors are basically bullshit.


Edit to add....on top of the insanely long NFA approval times. They should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Posts: 3576 | Registered: February 25, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
That rug really tied
the room together.
Picture of bubbatime
posted Hide Post
You got it. Seems like some good things coming out of the ATF under this administration, if you can believe it.


______________________________________________________
Often times a very small man can cast a very large shadow
 
Posts: 6712 | Location: Floriduh | Registered: October 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Hot Fuzz
Picture of Turbo216
posted Hide Post
So, if I'm reading this right, your AR pistol with a brace is still a pistol no matter how you might hold it, as long as you've never altered the brace itself. Or, more simply, "we can't tell you how to hold your pistol."



Hater of fun since 2001!
 
Posts: 599 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: January 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
"[I]ncidental, sporadic and situational 'use'" - I get what incidental and sporadic mean, but what exactly are they saying is a "situational" use?

What would constitute sufficient evidence to prove that someone always used the brace as a shoulder stock and had therefore magically turned the pistol into an SBR?


No one can say until there's an actual case that gets tried with relevant facts in play.

I've always been surprised at BATFE's willingness to issue this kind of opinion letter. Courts generally will not issue an advisory opinion (giving an opinion on a rule/statute w/o an actual case), not sure what makes agencies so willing to when courts will not.

For those of you calling for the disbanding of BATFE, that will only work if the culture you so disapprove of is not transmitted to another agency.

The laws regarding NFA, etc will still have affect, and therefore require an agency (no matter what its name is) to enforce them. And it's likely with the way that gov't works, the same GS-XX that issued BATFE FTB's opinions that you don't like will simply get absorbed into whatever new agency/existing agency is tasked with enforcing the NFA. Same actors, new costumes.
 
Posts: 17733 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
Here is the actual letter from DOJ/BATFE (PDF)
https://www.thetruthaboutguns....er-Final-3.21.17.pdf

With the punchline in the document:
quote:
Therefore, an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not re-configured for use as a shoulder stock- even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17565 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of FlyingScot
posted Hide Post
Excellent. Now when will Geiselle release an SSA trigger they approve for the MPX Wink. I like my SB tactical collapsing brace.





“Forigive your enemy, but remember the bastard’s name.”

-Scottish proverb
 
Posts: 1999 | Location: South Florida | Registered: December 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
Honestly most of these laws are either meant to be a nuisance to the law abiding or a tack on charge to a criminal.

Hell my thoughts are that it should all be perfectly legal unless you are committing a crime.

Would any of us scoff if SBR/SBS/Suppressors were perfectly legal......unless used in a crime and then they would be used as additional charges/negotiating.

My point is there is a middle ground so to speak. Allow the law abiding what they want but the minute said item is used in a REAL crime start tacking charges on.


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 8014 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
From the letter, it almost sounds as if they're saying you can use an arm brace any way you want as long as you don't physically modify it in a way that (1) it is less effective as an arm brace or (2) it is more effective as a shoulder stock.

Of course that takes us right back around the merry-go-round - the letter only says its OK if the use is "incidental, sporadic or situational". Ugh. I'm going to bed.
 
Posts: 27313 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
Again this is all so stupid. Make SBR/SBS/Suppressors legal. They are not in any way more or less dangerous then any other firearm. One could argue that full auto, without training, especially with tiny full autos such as mini uzis do add a level of additional danger to an untrained shooter and or bystanders no matter how thin the argument. The same cannot be said for SBS/SBR/Supressors.

Make them all legal and just make there use in a crime extra onerous.


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 8014 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
Let's separate the henchmen from the villains here. The bureaucrats at the ATF play the cards that Congress has dealt them. The could be much more of a problem than they are.

For instance, the could have easily (from a legal standpoint), banned the SIG brace, and equivalents. The didn't. But they have to follow the NFA. So the can't do anything will supressors unless Congress changes the law.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Once and Future SIG Shooter
Picture of Mike S
posted Hide Post
To clarify my position on the BATFE and their reversal of their initial reversal of their original position: I may or may not have ever given a shit to begin with Big Grin
 
Posts: 4524 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: December 08, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rock Paper
Scissors
Lizard Spock
Picture of James in Denver
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Turbo216:
So, if I'm reading this right, your AR pistol with a brace is still a pistol no matter how you might hold it, as long as you've never altered the brace itself. Or, more simply, "we can't tell you how to hold your pistol."

Ok, so the way I read the letter and the statement on "affix to the buffer tube", I'm getting the same thing.

Buy the brace, leave it alone and your good-to-go for "occasional/sporadic" use in whatever way you see fit.

So, that brings up the Odin Works "stop thing" which makes the brace be more-or-less like a stock. Or the Phase 5 (?) tube that has the wide part that stops the brace from moving. Or the tube that has the divots in it for the Blade brace to lock in to. I'd seriously question those types of "gadgets".

Buy the brace, install it, use it how you like, just don't "modify" it.

That's how I read it... Smile

James


----------------------------
"Voldemorte himself created his worst enemy, just as tyrants everywhere do! Have you any idea how much tyrants fear the people they oppress? All of them realize that, one day, amongst their many victims, there is sure to be one who rises against them and strikes back!"
Book 6 - Ch 23
 
Posts: 4484 | Location: Colorado | Registered: August 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Alienator
Picture of SIG4EVA
posted Hide Post
You know what? I will continue using it as I see fit. A small benefit of having your own range.


SIG556 Classic
P220 Carry SAS Gen 2 SAO
SP2022 9mm German Triple Serial
P938 SAS
P365 FDE
P322 FDE

Psalm 118:24 "This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it"
 
Posts: 7202 | Location: NC | Registered: March 16, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Music's over turn
out the lights
Picture of David W
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SIG4EVA:
You know what? I will continue using it as I see fit. A small benefit of having your own range.


Bingo, that's how I feel.


David W.

Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud. -Sophocles
 
Posts: 3649 | Location: Winston Salem, N.C. | Registered: May 30, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    BATFE reversal of reversal of Open Letter on Shouldering SIG-style Brace

© SIGforum 2024