SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question about the Trade war with China >>>>>>>
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question about the Trade war with China >>>>>>> Login/Join 
Member
posted
I am no expert and I know that China manufactures many of the items because of cheap labor, but could we not tell American companies to start opening manufacturing shops in other countries such as India, Vietnam, Mexico, etc which would then help these countries economies and slowly weaken China ? It would take a few years, however I would think that within 3-5 years a significant amount could have moved to other countries hurting China. Just my thoughts. God Bless Smile


"Always legally conceal carry. At the right place and time, one person can make a positive difference."
 
Posts: 3072 | Location: Sector 001 | Registered: October 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.
 
Posts: 7568 | Registered: October 31, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bytes:
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.



OK maybe we can SUGGEST or make it highly attractive for companies to have their manufacturing business in these other countries or even back home in the USA other than China. God Bless Smile


"Always legally conceal carry. At the right place and time, one person can make a positive difference."
 
Posts: 3072 | Location: Sector 001 | Registered: October 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I do that now. If I can find a reasonable alternative to a product made in China, I will pay more for it.

My priority list:
USA
Canada or Mexico
Anywhere but China
China as a last resort.


------------------------------
"They who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin

"So this is how liberty dies; with thunderous applause."
- Senator Amidala (Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith)
 
Posts: 1494 | Location: Southwest Ohio | Registered: October 07, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of reloader-1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by VBVAGUY:
quote:
Originally posted by Bytes:
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.



OK maybe we can SUGGEST or make it highly attractive for companies to have their manufacturing business in these other countries or even back home in the USA other than China. God Bless Smile


That’s called a tariff, which I support wholeheartedly in regards to China.

My priority list is in groups:

Group 1:

US, Canada, Japan, any European country, Australia, NZ

Group 2:

LatAm, Southeast Asian countries (except China), Rest of World

Group 3:

China
 
Posts: 2328 | Location: S. FL | Registered: October 26, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
High Speed Low Drag
Operator in the Innis Mode
Picture of Ke Bo Li
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bytes:
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.


That's the bottom line. They ALL already do this. The international product life cycle tells us things will be made where it is most cost effective to make them. And the owners/shareholders demand profits. Ask Walmart (China's #8 customer on earth I believe) about their reverse auction process.
Case in point: a couple years ago I bought a new watch, a 21 jewel Seiko automatic. $55.00 delivered. I get it, I turn it over, and TA-DA made in Indonesia. Japanese company subs out manufacturing to another country. Shinola watches? Where are their movements made?

Re-shoring IS happening. Cost of production in China is way up. Foxconn is investing heavily in robots. Mexico will get expensive too. Industrialization rolls around the globe.
And the profit seekers will follow it and exploit it to insure positive returns for the shareholders. And you better hope you cannot be replaced by a robot.

You don't like? Fine. Your money, spend it wisely, look at the tags/labels on everything before you buy it. They're all marked with country of origin.


***********************
I think the "check engine" light is burned out
 
Posts: 710 | Location: Portland,OR | Registered: October 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
High Speed Low Drag
Operator in the Innis Mode
Picture of Ke Bo Li
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by reloader-1:
quote:
Originally posted by VBVAGUY:
quote:
Originally posted by Bytes:
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.



OK maybe we can SUGGEST or make it highly attractive for companies to have their manufacturing business in these other countries or even back home in the USA other than China. God Bless Smile


That’s called a tariff, which I support wholeheartedly in regards to China.

My priority list is in groups:

Group 1:

US, Canada, Japan, any European country, Australia, NZ

Group 2:

LatAm, Southeast Asian countries (except China), Rest of World

Group 3:

China


Good idea, sort of why tariffs exist in the first place, but the harsh reality of this situation: https://tariffshurt.com/


***********************
I think the "check engine" light is burned out
 
Posts: 710 | Location: Portland,OR | Registered: October 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of reloader-1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ke Bo Li:

Good idea, sort of why tariffs exist in the first place, but the harsh reality of this situation: https://tariffshurt.com/


Nice website. Cost a good chunk of change, I’m sure it’s altruistic.

With China, it’s either pay the piper now or pay him double later, in blood. They are the only credible threat to us on a national scale, and we keep building them up.

Candidly speaking, from a demographics and economic standpoint, only a handful of nations could ever be a possible threat to the US: China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan and perhaps Nigeria.

No matter how much we buy from Switzerland, Burkina Faso, Taiwan or Ecuador, those countries don’t have the manpower or geographic size to possibly build an economic and military threat to the US. Of the countries above, only China has taken the necessary steps, and has also consistently stated their goal of hegemony.
 
Posts: 2328 | Location: S. FL | Registered: October 26, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by VBVAGUY:
quote:
Originally posted by Bytes:
We don't tell any company (except defense contractors) where to do their business. They do it where it is the most profitable.



OK maybe we can SUGGEST or make it highly attractive for companies to have their manufacturing business in these other countries or even back home in the USA other than China. God Bless Smile


We did with NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and a lot of them did put factories in Mexico. But China is still much cheaper to produce in.
 
Posts: 21335 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
And China has long invested in, or created companies in, countries like Canada, Mexico, Vietnam, Australia, etc. - specifically to increase their influence in those countries AND to take advantage of trade pacts between ourselves and those other countries.
 
Posts: 27293 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of jcsabolt2
posted Hide Post
The real issue with China isn't so much a trade issue as it is a cyber and espinoage issue. The vast bulk of computers and electronics are produced in China and those components have "infected" systems around the globe allowing China access to big corporate and government data at the least for decades. Our entire supply chain has been infected and it is impossible to catch it all and it will costs hundreds of billions of dollars to do so.

Here's the real end game concerning China. The U.S. has a population of around 320M and the Chinese nearing 1B. If 1/3 of Chinese are dumb, of average intelligence and smart, then they have more smart people than we have people. It is a simple numbers game and in the end we will not win based on that simple fact. Give it 20, 40 years and it will happen.


----------
“Nobody can ever take your integrity away from you. Only you can give up your integrity.” H. Norman Schwarzkopf
 
Posts: 3635 | Registered: July 06, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Keep in mind that manufacturing involves not just the factory that assembles whatever item you're thinking of but, the entire supply chain where the raw materials and the small components are also produced. Right now in apparel, when it comes to fabrics/textiles and the assorted findings (zippers, snaps, buckles, trims, etc..) just about that entire supply chain from raw materials all the way to the finished goods are produced in China. Factories, like everything else are measured by the quality of goods they can produce, how modern their machines are, how up to date they are with their employee conditions (housing, food, medical, etc..) and their relationships with the transportation infrastructure to move finished goods from factory, to port. China is increasingly moving towards the high-tech manufacturing sector while countries like Vietnam and Indonesia are picking up a lot of the low & mid-skilled factory work that China has dominated for the last 25-years.

Most companies do not own their own manufacturing, it's too expensive to keep a factory up and running producing only a single company's goods. Factories, like Foxconn (world's largest electronics producer) are third party operations, they contract to manufacture other brands goods to the standards that are agreed upon. Their entire structure involves sourcing, design and assembly, the country's where they are located also affords them breaks both in taxes and likely labor and environment legalities. Companies, wherever they're from, will open factories where it's financially favorable. We know US standard of living, labor and environmental laws make low and mid-skill mass manufacturing highly costly. Mexico and some of the other bigger S.American countries need to step up their game, and start competing while the anti-China temperature continues to go up.
 
Posts: 14699 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
Simple answer to a complex situation, that's what adding these tariffs will do if they stay in place.
That's also why they are the quickest and most effective tool we have for changing their behavior relatively quickly.
In spite of our increasing interaction with the country for mostly economic reasons, China is still a communist dictatorship. They manipulate their currency, closely control their people and communications and generally restrict personal freedoms.
A better question is, why did all of our former "leaders" let it get to this point without doing something when it could have been more easily managed?
Money influencing politics and a certain amount of poor vision or strategic thinking by both politicians and business leaders.


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9557 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Greed & stupidity.
 
Posts: 5769 | Location: west 'by god' virginia | Registered: May 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 220-9er:
A better question is, why did all of our former "leaders" let it get to this point without doing something when it could have been more easily managed?

Globalism.

Started with the Bushes and kicked into high gear by the Clintons.


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 20131 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
This was an article from a couple of months ago that touches on US made goods:

Homegrown Gear: Made in America Makes a Comeback
quote:
Homegrown Gear: Made in America Makes a Comeback

More and more outdoor products are made in America. Here’s why you can expect the trend to continue—plus a few choice gear picks to look for.

Kelly Bastone - Updated onFeb 14, 2017

Look at the label on the shirt you’re wearing. Or the boots on your feet. Or the tent, pack, and bag in your closet. Odds are, they were made overseas. No surprise, right? Manufacturing started chasing cheap labor decades ago. But the odds are changing. A recent resurgence in American-made gear has reversed the migration of factory work. From high-performance wool to ultradurable backpacks, more and more outdoor products are made in the U.S. Here’s why you can expect the trend to continue—plus a few choice picks to look for if you want a trail kit as local as your tomatoes.

You’d need about 70,000 frenzied Seahawks fans to equal the energy of one thundering stomp of the mattress press at Cascade Designs, located amid a sprawl of flat-roofed warehouses south of Seattle’s CenturyLink Stadium. You feel the three-story-high press in your gut, not your ears. Nearby, steam irons bigger than city buses gasp and sigh as they meld swaths of fabric into Therm-a-Rest NeoAir sleeping pads. Next up: snowshoes, camping stoves, trekking poles, and hydration reservoirs, all made right here.

Just a few years ago, Cascade Designs looked like a holdout from the bygone era of American manufacturing. Now, it’s surfing a groundswell. From boutiquey apparel brands like Voormi and Duckworth to established footwear giants such as Chaco and KEEN, an increasing number of outdoor companies are choosing domestic, rather than foreign, manufacturing. Even behemoths like The North Face are dabbling in homegrown and U.S.A.-made: This winter TNF debuted the Backyard Hoodie, which turns a heritage strain of California-grown cotton into a plush, American-made sweatshirt. They join brands such as Ford Motor Company, which onshored 8,100 jobs in 2012 and pledged to hit 12,000 this year. In fact, more than a third of large U.S. manufacturing companies plan to return some production to the U.S., according to a recent study by the Boston Consulting Group.

Why have outdoor brands embraced the stateside migration? Changing buying habits, for starters. Local is the new buzzword, and many companies are betting that if you care about where your apples are grown, you’ll care about where your jacket is sewn. Indeed, Cascade Designs intends to make the most of its Seattle heritage by relocating its "Made in the U.S.A." labeling to the front of the packaging. (Federal Trade Commission guidelines dictate that the "Made in the U.S.A.” label only applies when a product is “all or virtually all” made here—including labor and parts. Other claims, like “American Built,” aren’t as strictly regulated, and generally mean that only a portion of the product is sourced or made domestically.)

“Just 10 years ago, buyers didn’t care where their stuff came from,” says Chip Coe, Chaco’s general manager. “But Millennials are very aware of the origin of goods.” Chaco quickly sold out of its “From the Vault” line of Michigan-made sandals priced at $125 (compared to $100 for Asian-made versions). “We’ve proven that consumers are willing to pay a bit more for U.S. goods, provided they’re of good quality,” Coe says.

That’s exactly how apparel startup Duckworth plans to succeed. “The new luxury is to understand where your product comes from,” says Duckworth founder Robert Bernthal, who sources the Rambouillet wool for his company’s baselayers from a single Montana ranch.

But culture trends aren’t the only factor driving the return of U.S. manufacturing. The era of cheap Asian labor is ending: Recently, Chinese labor costs have grown 15 to 20 percent each year. Trans-Pacific shipping costs have become increasingly expensive. And political instability can also threaten production—witness the May 2014 riots in Vietnam, during which 20,000 protestors stormed factories in Binh Duong. The effect on gear companies was tangential, but the protest revealed how vulnerable foreign factories can be to social and political upheavals.
quote:
The protest was about Vietnamese locals pissed at their treatment by Chinese factory owners and upper management...lookup China/Vietnam history to see the animosity there


Politics plays a role on this side of the water as well, thanks to the 1941 Berry Amendment. It obligates U.S. armed forces to equip troops with American-made gear. Brands such as Outdoor Research, Mystery Ranch, and Gerber maintain domestic production to serve military contracts, but civilians see benefits from these deals as well. OR’s cut-and-sew facility in Seattle stitches sophisticated gloves for the Navy Seals and Army Rangers, and also serves as an R&D lab for consumer designs. “Even though consumer items are later produced offshore, we can work out the glitches in Seattle so that we know it’s a viable product for mass production in our partner factories,” says Jordan Wand, OR’s vice president of product and marketing. And with an anticipated expansion to include footwear, the Berry Amendment may soon give U.S. manufacturing yet another shot in the arm.

But challenges remain. Few U.S. factories have kept pace with new construction techniques such as plastic injection and seam-welding. For now, high-tech ski boots and outdoor apparel will still be imported. Overseas manufacturers also developed unmatched expertise in specific categories. “Asia has a handful of factories that unquestionably produce the best tents in the world,” says NEMO founder Cam Brensinger. “Should you try to make those same tents here, they’d be 70 percent as good and cost twice as much.”

But the most significant bottleneck choking the growth of American manufacturing is the lack of skilled labor. Workers laid off in the 1980s and '90s either found other jobs or retired. “Talent for non-automated production is gone,” says Chaco’s Coe.


So how do brands tackle that challenge? Companies such as KEEN and Princeton Tec have established processes for redeveloping the labor force, assigning apprentices to work alongside masters before those workers retire and take their know-how with them. “Some skills have died out in the broader manufacturing picture, so we maintain them here by creating our own talent pipeline,” says George Chevalier, Princeton Tec’s marketing manager. “Guys come in, start doing basic stuff, and eventually they pick up the skills needed to make or rework the molds we use in our manufacturing process.”

But it's not clear if such efforts will work for all categories of gear. “How many teenagers do you know who want to grow up to be sewers?” asks NEMO’s Brensinger. Instead, he says, Americans should pioneer labor-saving innovations like computer-controlled seam-welding. “Let’s advance the technology and be creative instead of going backward and onshoring jobs we’ve already proven weren’t sustainable in this country.”

In order to pay sustainable wages and maintain competitive pricing, stateside manufacturers must trim other expenses. Easton Mountain Products and Cascade Designs save money by making their own parts. Black Diamond prioritizes cheaper manufacturing methods: Making crampons from stainless steel (instead of aluminum) bypasses the need for paint or other surface treatments that add cost. Mystery Ranch sells direct to consumers, cutting out the middleman.

For the moment, at least, it appears these efforts are working. And the outdoor-industry jobs that are created—or preserved— come with a fringe benefit: the satisfaction of helping people do what they love. At Orvis, which builds its premium fly rods in Vermont (and just re-shored production of its hallmark CFO model reels last spring), a third of the “Thirty-Year-Plus Club” members hail from the factory floor. “I feel proud when I see someone—especially a child or first-time angler—using an Orvis rod that I built,” says Brian LaRose, a 30-year veteran. “It’s very rewarding knowing that something I helped create brings people so much joy.”
 
Posts: 14699 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Festina Lente
Picture of feersum dreadnaught
posted Hide Post
Some folks think this is part of a long-term plan to neutralize China, and build alliances with manufacturing countries other than China...


Perhaps now people will reference President Trump’s long-game strategy which has been evident since his marathon Asia trip in November 2017.

Long before media pundits starting noticing/considering how serious President Trump was about structurally resetting the entire landscape of a U.S-China trade relationship, President Trump quietly and methodically laid the groundwork with personal visits to: Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (Japan); President Moon Jae-in (S-Korea); President Tran Dai Quang (Vietnam); and President Rodrigo Duerte (Philippines).

Oh, how quickly the media forgot.

These were not visits as part of multi-national/multilateral G20 or G7 discussions. The November 2017 tour of Asia was President Trump traveling to meet directly, face-to-face, one-on-one with the manufacturing heavyweights of Southeast Asia.

At every single stop he broadcast the intent of the visit: “We’re talking TRADE”!

These were unilateral meetings; and, in hindsight, clearly designed to structure the foundation of the current U.S-China trade conflict. You might remember CTH calling this the “golden ticket tour“. The tour culminated in the November 12-13, 2017, ASEAN summit; but the 10-day tour of Asia was entirely separate from the summit.

After the collapse of the U.S-China negotiations, there’s a reason why President Trump says: “we’re in no rush” to make a deal.

The reality is, though President Trump will continue to provide enticements for U.S. product manufacturing to return, there is an abundant ASEAN base to replace China.

This Art-of-The-Deal strategy is an aspect that almost no-one is paying attention to.

Of course, to consider this strategy the media would have to admit that President Trump has just executed one of the biggest global and geopolitical trade strategies of all time….

Nah, can’t be. Wait, wha?


https://theconservativetreehou...-summit/#more-163688

h



NRA Life Member - "Fear God and Dreadnaught"
 
Posts: 8295 | Location: in the red zone of the blue state, CT | Registered: October 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
Trump is absolutely right in what he is doing. If I have to pay afew dollars extra for awhile so be it. There is no other way to deal with China in this reguard. We had a deal with them and they backed out. The Chinese always pull this crap. Someone needs to teach them. I'm 100% behind Trump on this.
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: August 25, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:
could we not tell American companies to start opening manufacturing shops in other countries such as India, Vietnam, Mexico, etc which would then help these countries economies and slowly weaken China ?

Couple points to make here

#1 - it is not about 'weakening' China.

#2 - it is not about 'helping' any other country

#3 - any country's government that would force their country's businesses to invest outside their own country would lose power quickly, and justifiably so

#4 - there is a handy comprehensive enumeration of the US Federal Government's powers, and doing #3 is not on the list.

Other than that, well, why not? Wink
 
Posts: 15039 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
bigger government
= smaller citizen
Picture of Veeper
posted Hide Post
The articles about this on the Conservative Treehouse are excellent. Highly recommended. They're all well written and well sourced.

Here are some of the more recent posts:

NO DEAL – China Departs Early as Negotiations End – President Trump Fulfills Campaign Promise…

Sunday Talks: Larry Kudlow -vs- Chris Wallace on China…


This one is great because it highlights Trump's early trip to Asia- as it now makes sense why he did it:
President Trump Points Out Alternate Favorable Trade Partners – The 2017 “Golden Ticket” Summit….

Most recent:

Investment Exodus / Shifting Supply Chains – China Walks into Trump’s “Golden Ticket” Trap…




“The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it.”—H.L. Mencken
 
Posts: 9163 | Location: West Michigan | Registered: April 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question about the Trade war with China >>>>>>>

© SIGforum 2024