SIGforum
If You’re Trying To Ban Guns, The Least You Can Do Is Learn The Basics

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/320601935/m/5300047834

March 08, 2018, 04:47 PM
cas
If You’re Trying To Ban Guns, The Least You Can Do Is Learn The Basics
I like the term "modern assault weapons".

I like to ask people, "How would you feel if you were told you couldn't own modern automobiles... like the 1947 Packard."


_____________________________________________________
Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911.

March 08, 2018, 05:02 PM
rusbro
quote:
Originally posted by cas:
I like the term "modern assault weapons".

I like to ask people, "How would you feel if you were told you couldn't own modern automobiles... like the 1947 Packard."


Regarding the argument from antis that the founding fathers couldn't have possibly envisioned the existence of an AR or AK, I say that's complete bullshit. I think you could hand one of the founders one of those rifles and they would immediately grasp the improvements over say a musket, and recognize that it's still just a rifle.

However, I think they'd likely be totally aghast if I were to stand them in front of my big-screen TV, shown them hollywood horror, hollywood sex, hollywood violence, and then follow it up some hardcore FPS gaming, followed up with a nice tour of the most explicit, vile and poisonous videos the web has to offer... I think they'd be much more likely to want to repeal/rewrite the 1st Amendment than the 2nd after seeing what we've done with our "freedom of speech." (not that I'm in any way arguing for restrictions on the 1st)
March 08, 2018, 10:23 PM
Tuckerrnr1


Like this gem?


_____________________________________________
I may be a bad person, but at least I use my turn signal.
March 08, 2018, 11:13 PM
Nismo


March 09, 2018, 12:03 AM
LDD
quote:
Originally posted by rusbro:
quote:
Originally posted by cas:
I like the term "modern assault weapons".

I like to ask people, "How would you feel if you were told you couldn't own modern automobiles... like the 1947 Packard."


Regarding the argument from antis that the founding fathers couldn't have possibly envisioned the existence of an AR or AK, I say that's complete bullshit. I think you could hand one of the founders one of those rifles and they would immediately grasp the improvements over say a musket, and recognize that it's still just a rifle.

However, I think they'd likely be totally aghast if I were to stand them in front of my big-screen TV, shown them hollywood horror, hollywood sex, hollywood violence, and then follow it up some hardcore FPS gaming, followed up with a nice tour of the most explicit, vile and poisonous videos the web has to offer... I think they'd be much more likely to want to repeal/rewrite the 1st Amendment than the 2nd after seeing what we've done with our "freedom of speech." (not that I'm in any way arguing for restrictions on the 1st)


Scalia already disposed of the argument in District of Columbia v. Heller.

If you want to watch an anti's eyes glaze over, apply the same line to *gasp* Twitter or Facebook. The Founding Fathers never envisioned a type of publicly accessible media that could broadcast a message world-wide instantaneously. Does that mean one does not have 1st amendment rights unless using only voice or through ink or movable-type presses?
March 09, 2018, 12:33 AM
lechiffre
quote:
Originally posted by LDD:
quote:
Originally posted by rusbro:
quote:
Originally posted by cas:
I like the term "modern assault weapons".

I like to ask people, "How would you feel if you were told you couldn't own modern automobiles... like the 1947 Packard."



Regarding the argument from antis that the founding fathers couldn't have possibly envisioned the existence of an AR or AK, I say that's complete bullshit. I think you could hand one of the founders one of those rifles and they would immediately grasp the improvements over say a musket, and recognize that it's still just a rifle.

However, I think they'd likely be totally aghast if I were to stand them in front of my big-screen TV, shown them hollywood horror, hollywood sex, hollywood violence, and then follow it up some hardcore FPS gaming, followed up with a nice tour of the most explicit, vile and poisonous videos the web has to offer... I think they'd be much more likely to want to repeal/rewrite the 1st Amendment than the 2nd after seeing what we've done with our "freedom of speech." (not that I'm in any way arguing for restrictions on the 1st)


Scalia already disposed of the argument in District of Columbia v. Heller.

If you want to watch an anti's eyes glaze over, apply the same line to *gasp* Twitter or Facebook. The Founding Fathers never envisioned a type of publicly accessible media that could broadcast a message world-wide instantaneously. Does that mean one does not have 1st amendment rights unless using only voice or through ink or movable-type presses?


I don't think these people are fond of the first either.


_______________________________
Do the interns get Glocks?
March 09, 2018, 11:11 AM
cas
I like to play with them... "So you're saying if Washington and the continental army / militia had AR-15's available to them, they wouldn't have used them against the British? Big Grin


_____________________________________________________
Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911.

March 09, 2018, 11:45 AM
M-11
How about changing the nomenclature to SR-15 for Sporting Rifle? Then the other side can refer to them as "Scary Rifles".



"Common sense is wisdom with its sleeves rolled up." -Kyle Farnsworth
"Freedom of Speech does not guarantee freedom from consequences." -Mike Rowe
"Democracies aren't overthrown, they're given away." -George Lucas
March 09, 2018, 11:59 AM
bendable
next time your blood pressure get right around normal,
then google this ass hat
http://www.chicagotribune.com/...-20170912-story.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3yjKCYTyek

he'll make you angry enough to want to kick small children





Safety, Situational Awareness and proficiency.



Neck Ties, Hats and ammo brass, Never ,ever touch'em w/o asking first
March 09, 2018, 12:32 PM
dsiets
Years ago a journalist in the local rag reported on a shooting.
He/she apparently talked w/ cops about evidence at the scene because the resulting story proclaimed that two guns were used. A S&W pistol and the other, a full auto! in calibur .32.

It took me a couple seconds to realize the cops must have recovered casings in .40S&w and .32acp.
From that point on I've come to believe nothing I read in the news, no matter the subject.
March 09, 2018, 03:09 PM
Out West
quote:
Originally posted by lyman:
quote:
Originally posted by zipriderson:
The first thing I ask my liberal in-laws when they start talking about this issue is if they know what 'semi-auto' means. They of course do not, and do not care, but my point is always they should know what they are talking about if they are going to advocate a certain position.


you would be surprised at the number of 'gun people' that do not know what the AR in AR-15 means,


I wish this forum had a"like button" for posts like this.
March 09, 2018, 03:14 PM
rusbro
quote:
Originally posted by dsiets:
...a full auto!... .32acp.


Ah yes, the dreaded Automatic Clip Pistol.
March 09, 2018, 03:15 PM
ArtieS
'course, you all know that "acp" stands for "Automatic Commando Pistol". Right! Right?



"I vowed to myself to fight against evil more completely and more wholeheartedly than I ever did before. . . . That’s the only way to pay back part of that vast debt, to live up to and try to fulfill that tremendous obligation."

Alfred Hornik, Sunday, December 2, 1945 to his family, on his continuing duty to others for surviving WW II.