Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
Thanks. I have been researching saws and the 620 looked very good and the pricing is still reasonable. _________________________ | |||
|
Member![]() |
I didn't mean it in that way, I meant using magnesium alloys in piston/cylinder/combustion chamber components in those other industries. Lover of the US Constitution Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster | |||
|
Member![]() |
Hi Fritz, Your advice about maintenance, fuel, and bar oil is great. But, I don't see the 400C on Stihl's website, I only see the 400CM. But based on your experience with the 400CM, it seems safe to assume one could go into it with full confidence. Anyway I've settled on the Echo 620P or a Stihl MS 362 or 400, but I can't figure out to go with the standard Stihl without M-Tronic or go with an M-Tronic model. My concern is that since I won't be using this saw professionally, I'm wondering about these points: Could the the M-Tronic control board (assuming a fully potted device) potentially go bad with age, since this saw would last me the rest of my life because I won't be using it all the time as a professional. Could it simply degrade with age under lesser use over a longer number of years as a homeowner, as opposed to lasting as long as the saw itself would when used daily by a pro ? Since I would be using it in only one region without any change in elevation, with very mild winters and hot humid summers, would the M-Tronic technology really make a difference for me, possibly increasing the risk of any finicky behavior, since I wouldn't be traveling to different states/places/climates/elevations the way a professional Arborist or Forestry Sawyer might ? My existing echo 40cc homeowner saw runs good all the time winter or summer at my house without any carburetor adjustments, so I'm assuming since it does this fine with the existing carburetor adjustments, could I expect a standard 362 without the M-Tronic feature to behave in the same fashion with predictable reliability for me, working in the same conditions all the time near my home, as opposed to constant changes in very cold/hot environments at various elevations like people working in the tree and forest industries that might benefit from M-tronic ? And assuming a properly adjusted carburetor not running too lean, would the Stihl with M-Tronic give me any notable advantages in some performance metrics that would make a difference for me just cutting wood for burning and trimming trees on my property ? The reason I'm asking is that I'm closer to pulling the trigger after getting permission to remove a large, very tall oak in my back yard. I have to hire a tree company to take it down and leave the good pieces in my yard so I can buck it up and split it to burn next year. The tree is dying and I convinced the boss that it will be less expensive for the tree contractor to take it down before it becomes more dangerous as it further degrades, and the fact that pro fellers fear large window makers falling on them more than anything else, and my wife has a good size shade garden she tends to regularly directly under that dying monster. For some reason she said ok this time, so I'm gonna take it down while it still has a fair amount of integrity remaining in the main bole. I have no quals for felling this monster myself, esp since it lives in a neighborhood, and would by necessity need to be felled onto an adjoining lot I do not own if they could fell it, as this tree is not out in the country in an area without people, and we do have kids in the neighborhood. So Fritz what do you think about these points for me with a Stihl regarding a standard carburetor/ignition system vs the M-Tronic setup ? The price doesn't seem to factor in for this saw either way with or without M-tronic, seeming pretty much the same either way. Lover of the US Constitution Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster | |||
|
Member |
The newer, smaller displacement, 400C is slated for introduction in 2025. I expect the original 400CM will be listed for awhile. The newer carb electronic controls have the advantage of starting with minimal pulls, regardless of saw or atmospheric conditions. With older saws I've experienced cold days where a saw just doesn't want to start or run smoothly. It might take a bunch of pulls to start, feathered throttle during the warmup phase to keep it from stalling, and a tendency to stall when idling. Electronics sense the saw and air conditions, and all this foolishness doesn't occur. On warm-to-hot days most saws start easily. The challenge is when the saw cools down a little bit, but not fully to air temperature. This can be where the saw might need just a little choke to start, but too much choke may flood it. Once flooded, one might clear the flooding by turning off the saw and pulling the starter a bunch of times. If that doesn't work, then it's time to remove the plug, dry it, and start over with full choke -- as the saw is likely cold by this time. Electronics sense the saw and air conditions, and all this foolishness doesn't occur. As I see it, the only potential issue with electronic carb controls is that it sometimes takes burning a few tanks of fuel before the saw runs at its full potential. I suspect the electronics might need to record a wide enough variety of conditions to accurately predict how to control the carb. There are a number of saws out there with electronic controls -- I don't hear of many electronics failures. There are plenty of mechanical things on a saw which can fail, especially with long-term use. There are old timers who state that they'd never own a saw with electronics, and that's why Stihl offers some saws without them. I've used a number of saws and saw brands over the decades, and I will never buy another saw without electronic carb controls. | |||
|
Member![]() |
Husky 555 with the autotune has been a solid. Not fussy at all and has alot of ass. | |||
|
Member![]() |
That settles it nicely, no foolishness for me either. Thanks Fritz. Lover of the US Constitution Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster | |||
|
Member |
An update from recent saw use. These are 2 partial blowdowns, definitely a few years old. I used my Ego battery saw on the first day of work. I limbed both snags on the ground and bucked the longer snag's trunk up to the 15" diameter part of the trunk. The wood in the longer snag was still pretty good, but the other snag was fairly rotten. The Ego saw cut fine, draining two 5Ah batteries. The chain felt a little dull at the end of the day. ![]() ![]() Here's where I decided to call it a day. ![]() It turned very cold on the way home and started snowing. I didn't clean the Ego saw or sharpen the chain afterwards, as I normally do. **** I returned the next weekend to tackle the remaining wood on the two snags with my Stihl 310. I also brought the grungy Ego, but didn't use it. I ended up using only the Stihl 310 that day, burning 3 tanks of fuel and cutting up a number of old blowdowns. The trunk on the ground ranged from 15" to 21" diameter. I bucked it with a 16" bar. The larger & taller standing snag was 24" diameter at the felling cut and 30' tall. The wood was rotten on the outside, dry & hard in the core. Again, felled & bucked with a 16" bar. ![]() ![]() ![]() **** Both saws got a bath at the car wash a few days later. After drying out, it was time to sharpen the chains. The Ego has a 3/8" low-profile/Pico chain, which is evidently made by Oregon. Two teeth were broken, so the chain is toast. I've used this chain a lot, and it's been sharpened by hand a lot. New Ego chains have 5/32" of tooth that can be filed away, before you reach the line on the teeth that means "this chain is done." I had 1/32" of steel on the teeth, so the chain was close to retirement. The EGO supposedly has the power equivalent of a 30-35cc gas saw. It was cutting OK -- with the bar fully buried in 15" of wood, with 2 broken teeth on an old chain. The Stihl 310 is over 20 years old, using a standard 3/8" chain, with a 59cc engine. New Stihl chains have 7/32" to 8/32" of tooth that can be filed away, before the chain is done. This chain has 2/32" of tooth left -- it's an old chain. It's been ground a couple of times, but the majority of the sharpening has been done by hand file. The bar is old and well-worn -- there's a lot of sideways play when I wiggle the chain's teeth side-to-side. But kept sharp, the combo still cuts quite well. And I don't fret when I have to cut old, dirty, and downed timber. ***** Bottom line -- it's nice to fell & buck using a big saw with a long bar. But it's not always necessary. I had to double-cut the felling notch on the 24" snag, due to using a 16" bar. Bucking the 21" and 24" logs wasn't a big deal with a 16" bar. Yes, it's easier when the bar is longer than the diameter of the wood. But with proper technique, bucking a big log on the ground with a smaller bar isn't a big deal. I bucked everything from one side of the log, and didn't get pinched. The professional fallers often buck logs that are larger than their bars. If you're not familiar with the proper technique, search Youtube for videos. Bjarne Butler is a heli logger in British Columbia. He uses 32" to 36" bars, and regularly falls & bucks cedars that are 5-6 feet in diameter. Due to the steep terrain in which he works, safety almost always requires bucking logs from only the uphill side of the log. The Stihl 400 is a nice saw. But so are the 261 and 362. | |||
|
Only the strong survive![]() |
I like the older saws that don't have the smog and emissions standard to meet. I have a Stihl 011 which I purchased in 1980 and a Stihl 038 Super which I got in 1982. The first thing I did was get rid of the Pico chain and switch over to the standard 3/8 chain on the 011 with a 16 inch bar. The 038 has a 20 inch bar and I tried a 24 inch bar which is too cumbersome. 41 | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|