SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency
Page 1 ... 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 ... 522

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
The Trump Presidency Login/Join 
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
Be careful. Last I heard, Pakistan was the only Islamic member of the nuclear club.


Are they going to nuke the US? Nope.
Are they going to nuke Israel? Nope.
Are they going to nuke India? Nope.

Will they export the technology? Possibly. But I believe they will do that with or without our money. So let it be without.

For years they have been threatening "what might happen" if we cutoff aid because they knew we had weak leaders. That has changed. If they want the money, which they do, they will eventually see it our way.
 
Posts: 10640 | Registered: June 13, 2003Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Having lived in South Asia, if I were running the show everyone who would deal with Pakistan-- State Dept., CIA, military-- would spend at least three months buying rugs from Pakistani dealers. You would then learn far more than from books, briefings, and so on.

Cut off the money to Pakistan, by all means. We are then in a bargaining position. If you have been buying rugs for three months, you will be able to manage the situation.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11291 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Edge seeking
Sharp blade!
posted Hide Post
The new year causes reflection on 2017. Thank you Donald Trump for you love of country, risking all like our rebellious forefathers to run for president, shining light on the traitorous roaches, and for delaying the US becoming a socialist post-constitution non-beacon.

I'm not necessarily religious, but god has blessed America. If all he had done was prevented shillary from becoming president, it would have been enough.
 
Posts: 7723 | Location: Over the hills and far away | Registered: January 20, 2009Report This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
it will get interesting now that SK is seizing ships delivering oil to NK

could get very interesting to see how far Ding Dong Dumb will go in his nuclear posturing

he should remember that out of all the counties on the planet, we've so far been the only one to nuke another war party - I am guess 2 or 3 over Pyong Yang would send them back to the stone age where they belong



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 54059 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Report This Post
Essayons
Picture of SapperSteel
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by hile:
I'm torn about the issues with Amtrak. I ride those tracks every day (though on NJ Transit, not Amtrak). They are in horrible disrepair, and face it, Amtrak owns the track, so they (not so much NJT or LIRR) are responsible for maintenance. As Amtrak is a federal agency, it does become something of a Federal problem. I agree the whole thing is a boondoggle, but I don't know what the answer is, either.


The answer is that the federal government had no damned business ever getting itself (and thus you and me) into the railroad business.

The government CAN'T do business. It just can't. Any effort to do that will/must inevitably devolve into vote buying and other forms of corruption.

If private enterprise can't make a business work, then it shouldn't be propped up/taken over by government. Not ever. Period.


Thanks,

Sap
 
Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006Report This Post
Edge seeking
Sharp blade!
posted Hide Post
quote:
I am guess 2 or 3 over Pyong Yang would send them back to the stone age where they belong



I'll guess that the percentage of the brainwashed population that wants anything other than life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is quite small.
 
Posts: 7723 | Location: Over the hills and far away | Registered: January 20, 2009Report This Post
Objectively Reasonable
Picture of DennisM
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by hile:
I'm torn about the issues with Amtrak. I ride those tracks every day (though on NJ Transit, not Amtrak). They are in horrible disrepair, and face it, Amtrak owns the track, so they (not so much NJT or LIRR) are responsible for maintenance. As Amtrak is a federal agency, it does become something of a Federal problem. I agree the whole thing is a boondoggle, but I don't know what the answer is, either.


Amtrak is the result of the "bailout/buyout" of theoretically failing passenger railroads by the fed.gov and consolidation under the National Passenger Rail Corporation. Because it's heavily taxpayer-subsidized, it doesn't need to be profitable or efficient... because Uncle will always be along directly if they need more "bailout" through an increased subsidy courtesy of Congress.

The USPS is the same, except that you can make a decent case that no civilized first-world country can be without a functioning postal system. And, the USPS does actually help the U.S. government transact business.

Same can't be said of Amtrak. If intercity rail service is such a keen idea and so necessary, why can't it function on a for-profit basis? More to the point here, why are my relations in the Western United States being asked to pay for my commuting convenience?
 
Posts: 2564 | Registered: January 01, 2004Report This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
IIRC, postal service is one of the enumerated powers (responsibilities) of the federal government.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Report This Post
Objectively Reasonable
Picture of DennisM
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flashguy:
IIRC, postal service is one of the enumerated powers (responsibilities) of the federal government.

flashguy


To establish post offices and roads, at least. No requirement that Congress actually do it, but your point is well taken.
 
Posts: 2564 | Registered: January 01, 2004Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...rcent-in-first-year/

Center for Immigration Studies researcher Nayla Rush released a new study comparing refugee admissions to the United States under Trump versus those under former President Obama between Jan. 20 to Dec. 20, 2017, and the same time period in 2016.

During the first 11 months of Trump’s presidency, the populist-nationalist president cut the number of foreign refugees entering the U.S. by about 70 percent , according to Rush’s research.

In his first 11 months, Trump admitted 28,875 foreign refugees to the U.S., a vast difference from the whopping 93,668 foreign refugees admitted in the same time period under Obama.

Likewise, for Fiscal Year 2018, Trump has lowered the number of refugees who can enter the U.S. to 45,000, which as Rush notes, is the lowest refugee cap since 1980.

Due to left-wing judges holding up implementation of Trump’s travel ban — which sought to halt refugee resettlement to the U.S. from terrorist-funding countries — nearly 5,600 refugees from Somalia, Iran and Syria were able to enter the U.S. this year.

But, in December 2017, Trump’s travel ban on refugees from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Somalia, Venezuela, and Yemen was able to be fully implemented, thus far ending refugee resettlement from these countries for the time being.

Under Trump, only roughly 2,000 Syrian refugees entered the U.S. in 2017, a far cry from the mass resettlement of more than 15,000 Syrian refugees in a single year under Obama.
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Partial dichotomy
posted Hide Post
^^^ More excellence!




SIGforum: For all your needs!
Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>
 
Posts: 39480 | Location: SC Lowcountry/Cape Cod | Registered: November 22, 2002Report This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
Victor Davis Hanson is one of the National Review writers who did not go Never Trump. He has consistently written supportive columns and articles, and this is a good one:

The Great Experiment


Basically says we had 8 years of Obama and America was worse off. Now we have at least 4 years of Trump, governing as a hard conservative. Will America be stronger, richer, more united? A good experiment.


_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
 
Posts: 18620 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Report This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sjtill:
Victor Davis Hanson is one of the National Review writers who did not go Never Trump. He has consistently written supportive columns and articles, and this is a good one:

The Great Experiment


Basically says we had 8 years of Obama and America was worse off. Now we have at least 4 years of Trump, governing as a hard conservative. Will America be stronger, richer, more united? A good experiment.


Good one, Doc. Thanks!




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...e-Sanders-rally.html

A witness who testified before a federal grand jury that handed down indictments of top Trump associates says the president can't get a fair shake and compared the jury room to a Bernie Sanders rally.

The witness claimed two of 20 jurors were wearing 'peace T-shirts,' and popped off on the jury pool to the New York Post's Page Six.

'The grand jury room looks like a Bernie Sanders rally,' the witness said. 'Maybe they found these jurors in central casting, or at a Black Lives Matter rally in Berkeley,' said the witness.

'There was only one white male in the room, and he was a prosecutor,' said the source.

The person said of 20 jurors, 11 are African-American.

That figure closely mirrors the racial composition of Washington, D.C., which is 49 per cent black. The jury pool, if the source is accurate and correctly identified the racial composition of the panel, is 55 per cent black.

In some cases, D.C. has had difficulty getting juries to match the racial composition of the city, the Washington Post has reported, due to difficulty getting poor minorities to answer the call for jurors and a higher proportion of young black men being eligible due to criminal convictions.

'That room isn't a room where POTUS gets a fair shake,' said the source
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Trump is tweeting that the DOJ needs to go after James Comey, and Huma Abedin-- who needs to be in jail. I would like to think that AG Sessions is doing some great work behind the scenes, but apart from going after MS13, there's no evidence that he's not just standing around with his thumb up his butt. This must be incredibly frustrating for Trump.

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...tate-doj-to-act.html


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11291 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
At the bottom of this article there's a quote that gives me hope.
quote:
And lastly, the main source of my confidence that all of this will come out…. Everyone mentioned directly or by association is also reading this sentence.


https://theconservativetreehou...ption-will-come-out/


____________________________________________________

The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart.
 
Posts: 13521 | Location: Bottom of Lake Washington | Registered: March 06, 2007Report This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
Steve Bannon turns on Trump:

quote:
On Wednesday, former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon tore into his former boss, President Trump, as well as Trump’s son Donald Jr. and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. He also backhandedly swiped his own publication, Breitbart News, and dumped all over the entire Trump campaign.

All in a day’s work for that supremely loyal aide to the Great Man Himself.

Bannon spoke with author Michael Wolff for Wolff’s new book; that book has now been reported by The Guardian. Bannon told Wolff that Robert Mueller’s investigation would “crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV.” He stated that Donald Jr.’s campaign meeting with a lawyer associated with the Russian government was “treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad s***,” and added that Trump Jr. and associates “should have called the FBI immediately.” Bannon’s shocking turn toward advocacy for transparency is a far cry from his statements on 60 Minutes last year, when he called the Russia investigation a “farce” and a “waste of time.” Suddenly, after Bannon becomes just another political loser hanging around the fringes of power, he has a change of heart. (Worth noting: Bannon wasn't on the campaign at the time of the meeting, so he has no insider knowledge of what happened there.)

Hilariously, Bannon went on to tell Wolff that such a meeting should have occurred “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people,” and information should then have been “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication.”

It’s certainly hilarious to hear Bannon, the chairman of Breitbart News, admit that he’s turned the publication into an illegitimate one. But it’s puzzling that Bannon thinks the meeting would become non-treasonous if it were leaked to the media.

Then again, Bannon was the leakiest faucet at the White House, too.

Bannon went on to tell Wolff that the investigation would eventually center on Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law: “You realize where this is going. This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissman first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to f***ing Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr. and Jared Kushner…It’s as plain as a hair on your face…It goes through Deutsche Bank and all the Kushner s***. The Kushner s*** is greasy. They’re going to go right through that. They’re going to roll those two guys up and say play me or trade me…They’re sitting on a beach trying to stop a Category Five.”

Odd how according to Bannon, the investigation will hit all of his personal enemies.

None of this is a surprise coming from a leech on the ass of power, a man who rode Michele Bachmann’s coattails to Sarah Palin’s coattails to Andrew Breitbart’s coattails to Donald Trump’s and the Mercer family’s coattails. It’s also not a shock from a fellow whose only contribution to the White House was apparently leaking regularly to reporters for The New York Times. Bannon’s an ambitious fellow, and his connection to power has now been reportedly cut off on both the monetary side (the going rumor has it that the Mercers aren’t funding his side projects anymore) and the political side (he’s not on good terms with the Trump White House, either). That means he has to build a brand of his own. So far, his branding isn’t going well — it turns out endorsing a credibly accused child molester and then utilizing your publication to dig up dirt on the accusers doesn’t do much for your Q rating. So now Bannon, who always had more balls than brains, is turning on the hand that fed him.

Bannon’s utterly full of crap on virtually every level, of course. He always has been. But his comments are going to cause a whole new round of headaches for the Trump administration, since the media have insisted from the outset that Bannon is far more important than he has ever actually been.


Link: Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro

Note: Ben Shapiro used to work for Breitbart, left during 2016 campaign. Not an Always Trump guy, but fair in my opinion.


_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
 
Posts: 18620 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Report This Post
Member
Picture of lkdr1989
posted Hide Post
Grain of salt...Shapiro's a never-Trumper. I'm not saying he doesn't stand for conservative principles but I view him in the same light as Bill Kristol; an intellectual first, conservative second.

quote:
Originally posted by sjtill:
Steve Bannon turns on Trump:




...let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one. Luke 22:35-36 NAV

"Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves." Matthew 10:16 NASV
 
Posts: 4406 | Location: Valley, Oregon | Registered: June 03, 2010Report This Post
Conveniently located directly
above the center of the Earth
Picture of signewt
posted Hide Post
I was hoping to see some commentary here on the Steve Bannon article which might clarify something....anything....


**************~~~~~~~~~~
"I've been on this rock too long to bother with these liars any more."
~SIGforum advisor~
"When the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change, then change will come."~~sigmonkey

 
Posts: 9878 | Location: sunny Orygun | Registered: September 27, 2009Report This Post
Festina Lente
Picture of feersum dreadnaught
posted Hide Post
one dude's thoughts on the Bannon / Trump "crisis"

DID THE TRUMP/BANNON TAG TEAM JUST PULL THE GREATEST POLITICAL RASSLIN’ MOVE OF ALL TIME?

So the other day Drudge ran a headline kicker above the electronic fold about Steve Bannon giving El Donaldo a verbal smackdown and threatening to toss his Hat In the Ring from the top rope come 2020.

If you missed it, the Media-ite story is linked here. But that’s not the story.

The real story is the one ripped from the playbook of any long-running episode of All Star Rasslin’.

You know, the one where the World Champion Tag Team partners have a falling out, one goes Good Guy, the other goes Bad Guy and the story line gets milked For All It’s Worth until the Inevitable Make Up in the Big Finale where one of ’em (usually The Good Guy) is getting the tar wailed out of ’em in a dastardly and underhanded manner, complete with folding chair head bashes and Lotsa Scalp Blood on the mat.

It looks like Situation Hopeless for Our Hero, when suddenly outta the dressing room The Former Friend Turned Foe comes charging to The Rescue.

Holy Heads Into Turnbuckles!

Flying drop kicks.

Forearm smashes.

Double-teamed body slams

Feats of daring-do and then the Rest of the Undercard Stable come racing down all the aisles for the Battle Royal and Triumphant Triumph of The Old Pals as the Reunited Conquers stand above The Carnage.

Trust me, this pre-ordained script is completely lost on Progressive SJW’s. They have never seen a single episode The Sport of Deplorables and are salivating at the thought of The Big Feud.

Let them.

Encourage them.

Chew your fingernails for them.

And then laugh at them snidely and with mega-snark when It All Collapses Around Them.

Do it for The Mad Dog and The Baron.

Grrraaawwww!!!!

https://www.spartareport.com/2...in-move-of-all-time/



NRA Life Member - "Fear God and Dreadnaught"
 
Posts: 8295 | Location: in the red zone of the blue state, CT | Registered: October 15, 2008Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 ... 522 

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency

© SIGforum 2024