Hakuna Matata, bitchezz...

The Washington Post (The Bezo Blog) actually went with this in their Obituary section until enough people blasted them for the idiotic headline:



They changed it now to read:

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, extremist leader of Islamic State, dies at 48

Meanwhile, the patriots at the Washington Post continued to impress.

Enlight of Abū Bakr al-Baghdad’s death, we should refrain from criticizing Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar MN, during her time of mourning.

^^^ So which is it? The two posts above concerning the Washington Post contradict each other.

Washington Pravda

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
When asked if he notified Pelosi of al-Baghdadi operation, President Trump says no, citing concerns about leaks. But multiple Congressional sources on the other side of the aisle were notified last night. Fox can find no Democrats who were notified

The Dems have done nothing to benefit or help the country along. Trump knew these children would just attempt to turn this all into shit. Little Nancy and Little Adam do not need to know about important adult matters. They just need to go to their rooms and sulk.

quote:

I was really hoping that the big news was going to be Brennan, Clapper and Strzok arrested. These domestic terrorists need to be dealt with.

So was I. Either that or Clintonsided. Clintonside would be okay for those guys...

"When asked if he notified Pelosi beforehand, Trump said he did not because he did not want any members of the U.S. forces to die .

“No, I didn’t. I didn’t do that. I wanted to make sure this kept secret,” Trump said. “I don’t want to have people lost.”

Great answer, Mr. President.

https://www.foxnews.com/politi...elosi-to-avoid-leaks

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

I was really hoping that the big news was going to be Brennan, Clapper and Strzok arrested. These domestic terrorists need to be dealt with.

So was I. Either that or Clintonsided. Clintonside would be okay for those guys...

Pretty sure the proper term is: "arkancide"

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^ So which is it? The two posts above concerning the Washington Post contradict each other.

They changed it twice.

Original was "Terrorist in Chief", they bowed to pressure from the Left and changed it to 'Austere Religious Scholar" and got hammered by actual normal Americans, so they changed it to "extremist leader of Islamic State".

They just can't understand why a vast majority of American citizens consider them to be enemies of the people, though. And that is not even mentioning the glowing profile in the actual body of the obituary.

If President Trump eliminated death, The WaPo headline would be "Trump Causes Overpopulation".

(I assume everybody knows that Jeff Bezos personally owns the Washington Post.)

quote:

Originally posted by Jim Shugart:
If President Trump eliminated death, The WaPo headline would be "Trump Causes Overpopulation".

(I assume everybody knows that Jeff Bezos personally owns the Washington Post.)

Yep...Microsoft got the DOD cloud contract. Too bad Amazon/Washington Post.

No mention of the true OPPRESSION that this shit stain caused either.

Leader of an organization skilled at Beheadings, rapes, and the most creative ways to torture and murder innocent people. Not to mention having his family wear bomb vests. This guy was an embodiment of evil.

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

I was really hoping that the big news was going to be Brennan, Clapper and Strzok arrested. These domestic terrorists need to be dealt with.

So was I. Either that or Clintonsided. Clintonside would be okay for those guys...

I think that would be "Clintoncide", but I agree.

flashguy

You mad, Nancy? Pelosi finally makes statement on al-Baghdadi raid and it’s as petty as it gets

She's mad because she wasn't told in advance...


https://www.bizpacreview.com/2...ponse&utm_term=EMAIL

I don't know who Elint News is, so we will have to wait to see if their report is true

SDF commander confirms Abu al-Hassan al-Muhajir, ISIS Spokesman & right-hand man of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has been targeted and killed in the village of Ain al-Baydah, near Jarablus, in a joint operation between the US military and SDF

Local reports that the ISIS spokesman was travelling in a vehicle near Jarablus when it was stuck by Coalition warplanes

Three airstrikes are reported to have hit the vehicle carrying the ISIS Spokesperson. It was travelling in an area controlled by Euphrates Shield Forces (Turkish military and their militias control this area).

https://twitter.com/ELINTNews/.../1188510156247699463

also being reported by Newsweek

The CIA has targeted Islamic State militant group (ISIS) spokesperson Abu al-Hassan al-Muhajir in a new operation that comes one day after the organization's leader was killed in a Joint Special Operations Command raid, Newsweek has learned.

Syrian Democratic Forces commander Mazloum Abdi, also known as Mazloum Kobane, also reported on the news Sunday.

"Continuing the previous operation, terrorist Abu al-Hassan al-Muhajir, the right-hand man of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and an ISIS spokesman, was targeted in the village of Ayn al-Bayda, near Jarablus, in direct coordination between SDF intelligence and the U.S. military," Kobane said.

Muhajir was named ISIS spokesperson in 2016 after his predecessor, Abu Mohammad al-Adnani, was killed in a U.S. airstrike, also in Aleppo. Unlike Baghdadi and Adnani, who were known to be Iraqi and Syrian nationals, respectively, and were openly active in Al-Qaeda in Iraq, Muhajir's identity was publicly unknown, though his nickname⁠—meaning "emigrant"⁠—suggested he may be a foreigner.


https://www.newsweek.com/us-st...h-syria-raid-1468018

nice to know that some people at CIA understand what their job is

quote:

Originally posted by downtownv:
You mad, Nancy? Pelosi finally makes statement on al-Baghdadi raid and it’s as petty as it gets

She's mad because she wasn't told in advance...


https://www.bizpacreview.com/2...ponse&utm_term=EMAIL

Pelosi must think: "Contrary is my job."

She shouldn't have been put in the loop because her hatred blinds her to how to look out for security.

I wish it was different but telling Nancy or Schiff or other Democrats must be considered in the context of the outright lies and misdeeds they press for political purposes.

They are not showing concern for the country and, arguably, see security forces as expendable - as in Benghazi.

We just can't risk military lives for political niceties with those who show they will not put American soldier's lives first.

The Democrats see their first duty as making sure Orangeman can't do anything right. Trade, infrastructure and so many things are needed but they just want to see Trump not succeed.

It's not wise to risk an important operation to that kind of mentality.

I love how President Trump said that he didn't just wait to advise the dems after the raid started- he waited to tell the dems until after the raid finished. Damn, that's gotta sting.

I expected the headline on CNN,Wash Post and New York Times to be "Trump Kills Three Children in Tunnel".