Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Yokel![]() |
There is charts it the link https://www.fool.com/investing...maker-in-the-us.aspx SIGSauer came in 4th All firearms manufacturers have enjoyed the boom in gun sales, but just one rose to the top to out-produce all others. Rich Duprey (TMFCop) Mar 4, 2017 at 8:00AM The landing has been hard for the firearms industry as it adjusts to the new environment of lower firearms demand after several years of white-hot sales. Although the gunmakers themselves are still reporting robust numbers, the outlook they share is disappointing as it returns to more modest levels, even if gun sales remain above historical trends. We can see it in the FBI's reported numbers for its National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS -- after 19 straight months of record numbers of checks conducted, the FBI has now reported two months of year-over-year declines. Although NICS checks have their limitations as a proxy for gun sales, the FBI data is generally considered a good industry barometer for demand. Over 27.5 million background checks were performed in 2016, up 19% from the prior year, more than double levels from a decade ago, and three times the number of checks performed in 1999, the first full year the FBI began tracking these statistics. Working overtime to keep pace To keep up with rising demand, the industry's manufacturing capacity has expanded along with it. Each year, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives lists the total number of guns sold in each category -- pistols, revolvers, rifles, and shotguns -- along with how many each manufacturer made. As can be seen, production spiked in 2013 as gunmakers sought to catch up with demand in the wake of calls for more gun control following the Sandy Hook shootings, and then finding a stable, but steadily growing base afterwards. It should be noted that the BATFE-reported data is delayed by one year to protect trade secrets. It's surprising who's not at the top So which gunmakers are the biggest? It might be surprising to know just how far down the list some of the most well-known names in the industry are, along with those who produce some of the most popular firearms. For example, Beretta is No. 15 on the list of biggest gunmakers in 2015, with 124,515 units. Of course, three-quarters of the guns it made are pistols, but it also produced nearly 2,000 rifles and over 28,000 shotguns. Similarly, Glock was ninth on the list with over 252,000 guns made, all of which were its famous pistols. Yet it was beaten out by some lesser-known manufacturers such as rifle manufacturer Henry Repeating Arms, which was eighth on the list with more than 300,000 firearms produced, and No. 5 Maverick Arms, which made over 473,000 rifles and shotguns that year. In fact, Maverick topped arguably better-known long arms manufacturer Savage Arms, which came in sixth place. Under the control of Vista Outdoor (NYSE:VSTO), which owns a portfolio of firearm, ammunition, and outdoors brands, Savage manufactured just under 400,000 rifles and shotguns. Filling out the next two spots were Sig Sauer at No. 4 with almost 500,000 firearms and third-place Remington Arms, best known for its rifles and shotguns -- producing over 1.1 million of them -- although it was also credited with 36,000 pistols. Narrowing the field to two So that leaves us with our final two industry leaders. You can probably guess their names, but which one came out on top? If you guessed Smith & Wesson, you were close but wrong. It came in second with almost 1.5 million firearms manufactured in 2015, while Sturm, Ruger (NYSE:RGR) once again reprised its role as the biggest gunmaker in the country with almost 1.7 million firearms. But the picture changes when you look at each product category. For example, Smith & Wesson, which just this year changed its corporate name to American Outdoor Brands (NASDAQ:AOBC) to deemphasize its focus on firearms, is the undisputed leader in pistols and revolvers, making a total of 1.26 million handguns in 2015, compared to Ruger, which produced a little more than 1 million. At these volumes, Smith & Wesson accounted for 28% of all of pistols and 31% of all revolvers, making its offerings some of the most well-known and most widely-owned firearms today. Ruger was second, with 21% and 29%, respectively. Where Ruger was able to surpass Smith & Wesson, however, was in rifle category with over triple the volume. The long reach of long arms Ruger made 662,000 rifles that year, second only to industry leader Remington, which dominates the long arms market (along with Maverick, the two companies account for almost 90% of all shotguns produced). Ruger AR-556 modern sporting rifle Image source: Sturm, Ruger. Ruger just reported its 2016 earnings with $664 million in total sales, up 20% from 2015, while profits were 43% higher year-over-year. The gunmaker said that it increased total unit production by 23.5% last year, which it attributed to dealers stocking up on certain types of firearms ahead of last November's elections. Ruger is in a strong position to come out on top again in 2016, but there were also words of caution from the company. Sturm, Ruger pointed to declining NICS checks in December and January, and management said it anticipated having to "manage our production to moderate inventory growth" for 2017. That means it may still sit atop the mountain of gunmakers, but the pile of firearms is likely going to be smaller for the immediate future. Trump victory could spark greatest bull market in decades We aren't politicos here at The Motley Fool. But we know a great investing opportunity when we see one. Our analysts spotted what could be a $1.6 trillion opportunity lurking in Donald Trump's infrastructure plans. And given this team's superb track record (more than tripling the market over the past decade*), you don't want to miss what they found. They've picked 11 stocks poised to profit from Trump's first 100 days as president. History has shown that getting in early on a good idea can often pay big bucks – so don't miss out on this moment. Click here to get access to the full list! *Stock Advisor returns as of February 6, 2017 Rich Duprey has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it! - John Steinbeck | ||
|
This Space for Rent![]() |
Dang. I was going to say Hi Point. Looks like they didn't even make the chart.... We will never know world peace, until three people can simultaneously look each other straight in the eye Liberals are like pussycats and Twitter is Trump's laser pointer to keep them busy while he takes care of business - Rey HRH. | |||
|
Honky Lips |
Ruger usually tops that list, I don't know any other company that makes everything, semi-auto's, revolvers, shotguns, and rifles. ___________________________ The point is, who will stop me? | |||
|
Fighting the good fight![]() |
Ruger doesn't offer shotguns any more, after discontinuing their Red Label shotgun line in early 2015. That accounts for the few hundred shotguns showing as being produced in 2015, but 2016's data should reflect 0. S&W has offered shotguns in years past, but doesn't currently. Curiously, S&W is listed as making 183 shotguns in 2015... I wonder what those were? Could that be their .410 "Governor" revolver? (I assume those would be classified as revolvers, though.) Maybe R&D shotguns, along with perhaps some replacement shotgun receivers for warranty work? FN, Kel-Tec, Browning, and Remington all offer pistols, rifles, and shotguns, but don't do revolvers. Beretta would qualify as making all four, if you were to include the replica "Western" revolvers made by their overseas subsidiary Uberti. Taurus also makes all four, but their rifles and shotguns are made overseas, and are currently not even available in the US. | |||
|
Diversified Hobbyist![]() |
The biggest gun maker based on NICs checks? Really, what a bunch of tripe. I have purchased 26 firearms since my last NICs check in 2013 (no check required due to CHL since then). Only one was a Ruger with multiple purchases of other brands Specific to 2015, I purchased eight firearms (no NICs check) none were Ruger. While Ruger may indeed be number one, I would wait on the 2015 AFMER report for a more reliable, accurate assessment. ----------------------------------- Regards, Steve The anticipation is often greater than the actual reward | |||
|
Fighting the good fight![]() |
The 2015 AFMER is already available. And if you'll reread the article in the OP, they've based their rankings on number of guns manufacturered by those companies in 2015 (presumably using the AFMER data), not the number of NICS checks. The part about NICS checks was only used in the first three paragraphs or so, to show the increase in demand in recent years. After that first section, the article is discussing 2015 firearm production rankings. | |||
|
Little ray of sunshine ![]() |
My thought was Smith and Wesson. Close, but no cigar. The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything. | |||
|
Member |
Having purchased three SR1911's in 45 ACP, one in 9mm, and an LCS9 Pro I've become a bit of a fan of Ruger. In terms of value for dollar spent Ruger has it right. I'm also tempted by the SP101 but not really a fan of revolvers with coil type mainsprings so currently all of my revolvers are S&W medium and large frame models. I've stopped counting. | |||
|
Member |
I was surprised how high Anderson arms placed. | |||
|
Laugh or Die |
For those of you that don't want to read the whole clickbaity article: 1. Ruger 2. S&W 3. Remington 4. Sig 5. Maverick 6. Savage 7. Henry 8. WM Anderson(?) 9. Glock ________________________________________________ | |||
|
Get on the fifty!![]() |
Gotta churn the $40 lowers "Pickin' stones and pullin' teats is a hard way to make a living. But, sure as God's got sandals, it beats fightin' dudes with treasure trails." "We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled." | |||
|
They're after my Lucky Charms!![]() |
Interesting, the top two re the only publicly traded companies on the list. Lord, your ocean is so very large and my divos are so very f****d-up Dirt Sailors Unite! | |||
|
Member![]() |
I'm a bit surprised by Glock's ranking but I imagine their profit margins have got to be tops. ...let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one. Luke 22:35-36 NAV "Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves." Matthew 10:16 NASV | |||
|
Drill Here, Drill Now![]() |
Looking at Glock's ranking, it's more apparent why Sig got into the semi-auto rifle market. I think they're putting the Fool in Motley Fool. 0bama sparked the greatest bull market in decades, and Hildabeast's campaign put the bull on steroids. Inventory seems high right now and prices are great so I don't think The Donald will make the market any more bullish. However, I hope he makes the supressor market into the greatest bull market ever. Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity DISCLAIMER: These are the author's own personal views and do not represent the views of the author's employer. | |||
|
delicately calloused![]() |
Jennings? You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier | |||
|
Administrator |
So the survey completely ignores production going to agency/military sales. That is going to change the balance sheet against manufacturers like HK, SIG, Beretta, and Glock, and will certainly help Ruger. | |||
|
Fighting the good fight![]() |
If you're basing that assumption on the sentence you quoted discussing NICS checks, then I'll again point out that only the first couple paragraphs of the article deal with NICS checks. The rankings aren't based on the number of NICS checks. The discussion in the majority of the article, and the rankings putting Ruger at #1, are based on production numbers. This data is available in the ATF's 2015 AFMER, which is a compilation of production statistics from all domestic firearms manufacturers: https://www.atf.gov/resource-c...-2015-final/download The first page of the AFMER states:
So that data may or may not include guns produced for agency/military sales. Depends on whether that meets the ATF's definition of being "disposed of in commerce". I believe that it would, since the guns are being sold to that agency/military. The Motley Fool has sorted through this data and compiled production rankings for this article. They're presented in a chart about halfway down the page that lists the production totals for the top 9 domestic manufacturers. I'll try to reproduce the chart below (as best I can within the limits of the forum's formatting): Manufacturer----Pistols---Revolvers---Rifles---Shotguns---Total Volume Sturm, Ruger----748,364---256,185----662,444------827-----1,667,820 Smith & Wesson--989,853---274,136----209,180-----183-----1,473,352 Remington Arms--36,049------0--------774,180---333,442----1,143,671 Sig Sauer--------459,655-----0---------36,563-------0-------496,218 Maverick------------0--------0--------125,814---347,658-----473,472 Savage Arms--------0--------0--------381,695----13,161-----394,856 Henry RAC-----------0--------0--------306,607-------0-------306,607 Wm C Anderson------0--------0--------300,390-------0-------300,390 Glock-------------252,145-----0------------0---------0-------252,145This message has been edited. Last edited by: RogueJSK, | |||
|
Fighting the good fight![]() |
I dug around the ATF's website, and found this blurb for clarification:
| |||
|
Baroque Bloke![]() |
I'm more interested in quality than quantity. Serious about crackers. | |||
|
Member |
Depends on how you measure "biggest". A company manufacturing 500K guns a year at an average wholesale of $800 is, in my opinion, much more impressive than a company pumping out 1.5M guns a year at $275 per unit. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|