SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    A Marine general led a fictional Iran against US military – and won 2002 Wargame
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
A Marine general led a fictional Iran against US military – and won 2002 Wargame Login/Join 
Never miss an opportunity
to be Batman!
Picture of jsbcody
posted
Interesting video on another interesting Marine General.

Old school tactics from the Red Force Leader (Iran in this war game) 41 year service Marine General, Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper (who served from Vietnam to Desert storm) kicked the Blue Force (US Troops with advanced weapons that weren't expected for 5 more years) so bad the the Blue Force Leaders complained and had the "rules" re-written.



I watched another We Are The Mighty Video on US WWII Ace Pilot who shoot down a US Plane....He supposedly got a medal and the girl for it. Cool

 
Posts: 4121 | Location: St.Louis County MO | Registered: October 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Told cops where to go for over 29 years…
Picture of 911Boss
posted Hide Post
Wow, great story on the pilot who shot down the US aircraft.

Ballsy move and way to take the initiative!






What part of "...Shall not be infringed" don't you understand???


 
Posts: 11490 | Location: Western WA state for just a few more years... | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
That story has taken on a life of its own since it came out. There's a lot more to it than what's been released and people have theorized on their own what was going on and the results. If it did happen the way it's been portrayed, great. The brass periodically needs to have their nose's bloodied and their sacred cows slain to wake them out of their cushy offices.

This is the same as when the USN leased the Swedish Gotland-class AIP submarine years ago and it allegedly whipped the USN in a variety of exercises. Capable and possible sure, however, without knowing the parameters and perspective, it's all click-bait. The whole point of leasing that particular sub was so the USN can get an understanding and develop tactics on how to counter AIP subs.
 
Posts: 15309 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
It would never happen. Warfare has changed too much since 2002 (not that I think they had a chance then either). We would simply drone the living hell out of them. We’d never even have to go inside Iran’s borders. It’s an exercise and why they call it fictional.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 16024 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:This is the same as when the USN leased the Swedish Gotland-class AIP submarine years ago and it allegedly whipped the USN in a variety of exercises. Capable and possible sure, however, without knowing the parameters and perspective, it's all click-bait. The whole point of leasing that particular sub was so the USN can get an understanding and develop tactics on how to counter AIP subs.


All you'd have to do is to prevent it going home over its usual operational duty time.

They 'Gotts' to eat and fuel-up, right? And our nukes can stay out and under for WAAAAY longer than any conventional sub.
 
Posts: 11538 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
MC02? Isn’t that the war game where opfor “put” anti ship missiles on rowboats and ultralight aircraft?
 
Posts: 10096 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:This is the same as when the USN leased the Swedish Gotland-class AIP submarine years ago and it allegedly whipped the USN in a variety of exercises. Capable and possible sure, however, without knowing the parameters and perspective, it's all click-bait. The whole point of leasing that particular sub was so the USN can get an understanding and develop tactics on how to counter AIP subs.


All you'd have to do is to prevent it going home over its usual operational duty time.

They 'Gotts' to eat and fuel-up, right? And our nukes can stay out and under for WAAAAY longer than any conventional sub.

My understanding is AIP subs, while fantastic in shallow water ways (Baltic, Med, straits around Japan, etc), are miserable in the big blue ocean. Not only are they painfully slow (what's the saying among boomers: 3kts to nowhere), their endurance is short hence, just wait them out or, drive them till they surface. Maybe some Bubbleheads can comment.
 
Posts: 15309 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Telecom Ronin
Picture of dewhorse
posted Hide Post
If we actually invaded Iran it would be 10 times worst than Iraq was.....and since we do not have the political will to actually fight a real war (like unlimited bombing of german and japanese cities) the way it should be we would lose.....
 
Posts: 8301 | Location: Back in NE TX ....to stay | Registered: February 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    A Marine general led a fictional Iran against US military – and won 2002 Wargame

© SIGforum 2024