SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Flock Cameras, AI and their assault on privacy
Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Flock Cameras, AI and their assault on privacy Login/Join 
Member
Picture of dan03833
posted Hide Post
I am 100% against them. But, when out & about in public, you have no expectation of privacy.
 
Posts: 1613 | Location: Rhode Island | Registered: February 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dan03833:
you have no expectation of privacy.


Nor should we have an expectation that someone is tracking and logging (and monetizing) our every move.




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 16192 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
What happens when we decide that we should have some semblance of privacy when we are out in public - such as freedom from being surveilled.
 
Posts: 55232 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
quote:
But, when out & about in public, you have no expectation of privacy



What is the difference between being stalked in public by a human, and being stalked in public by a computer?


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 16305 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
"What is the difference between being stalked in public by a human, and being stalked in public by a computer?"
It' easier and more fun to knock the shit out of a human.
 
Posts: 194 | Registered: April 07, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No More
Mr. Nice Guy
posted Hide Post
Doesn't it come down to what privacy means?

The pre-surveillance common understanding was that we weren't invisible to other humans who randomly crossed our path. There was a clear line where a person couldn't be stalked or their every move documented. That became harassment. A legal exception was created for celebrities and politicians, and we all see how terribly violated they feel when photographers follow them around and write stories about which doctor's office they went to or who they hang out with. It may have been illegal for law enforcement to surveil and collect such information on us without documented good cause.

Today, somehow the new claim is that we all are subject to the celebrity exception as long as it is machines photographing us, cataloging our lives, and disseminating that information.
 
Posts: 11289 | Location: On the mountain off the grid | Registered: February 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vthoky:
quote:
Originally posted by dan03833:
you have no expectation of privacy.


Nor should we have an expectation that someone is tracking and logging (and monetizing) our every move.


Many have quietly and gradually accepted their phone tracking where they go. Credit/debit cards track and sell what people buy. Retail stores, insurance companies, marketing, etc all buy your information and that was easier to accept because it felt more general. Why care what groceries and clothing I buy?

Flock has expanded this to local law enforcement and others in your city and county. How much do we expect all this info shared? When you apply for a permit, attend a city board meeting, or complain about a new ordinance or how some official does their job, what can they find out about your personal life?

Rabbit hole: There are interesting videos and articles lately about surveillance pricing and all the info bundled and sold about your by thousands of data brokers in the US.
 
Posts: 2431 | Registered: October 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
The root of it all: it's all about the dollars, one way or another.

The cell phone argument pops up every few pages, with the retort being that a cell phone is something its user opted IN to, where mass surveillance is not.

Same thing with our credit/debit cards --> "cash is king."

One way or another, somebody's going to track us, either for money (marketing) or for more nefarious purposes. We may have to accept it to some extent (that is: to the extent we opt IN), but we shouldn't be expected to like it. And it's my opinion that we should be expected to root it out and work against it in the large majority of cases.

How much do we expect this info shared? None, really. Yes, that's a mostly unreasonable expectation, but it's not invalid.




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 16192 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Internet Guru
posted Hide Post
Having no expectation of privacy in public is a concept people hate. It's only going to get worse. It's a simple fact that cameras are everywhere and eventually you will even be tracked from space. You can get rid of these Flock cameras and disband the company, and you'll still be monitored in public.
 
Posts: 2464 | Registered: April 06, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
You are also monitored in private space. All that data has to be stored somewhere
 
Posts: 1645 | Registered: November 07, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oldbill123:
You are also monitored in private space. All that data has to be stored somewhere

Worse, we are being made to pay for it with higher electricity costs near data centers… not to mention a better chance of brown or blackout, most often when it’s least convenient.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 16570 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
"They" (big gov, big business, other countries, etc.) are working against us.




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 16192 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of RichardC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
quote:
But, when out & about in public, you have no expectation of privacy



What is the difference between being stalked in public by a human, and being stalked in public by a computer?


One of them makes more noise when being cut down with a Sawzall
 
Posts: 17482 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 23, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post


(Stolen from Twitter.)




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 16192 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Flock Cameras, AI and their assault on privacy

© SIGforum 2026