SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Romeo 5 recall
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Romeo 5 recall Login/Join 
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by steve495:
it causes all sorts of issues with the remotes and devices they power.

I had many issues with a few Apple Air Tags and could not figure them out. It turns out the connections are weak due to the coating.


Good to know! Thank you.




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14290 | Location: Virginia | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Expert308
posted Hide Post
I wasn't even aware that such a coating exists. Never seen anything like that mentioned on battery packages. As far as the recall itself is concerned, I wonder if DOGE is aware of it? Wink
 
Posts: 7547 | Location: Idaho | Registered: February 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Res ipsa loquitur
Picture of BB61
posted Hide Post
We joke but I know a guy who had a small daughter ingest one and die a couple of years ago.


__________________________

 
Posts: 12673 | Registered: October 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BB61:
We joke but I know a guy who had a small daughter ingest one and die a couple of years ago.


That is horrible.

CR2032 batteries are so common, I'm surprised the risk of death isn't more widely known. The chances of a child eating a 2032 battery are much greater just by finding them loose in a nightstand drawer or a thousand other places around the home. They have become super common. A small child having access to a rifle optic and then unscrewing the cap and eating the contents seems extremely remote in comparison.
Will the Consumer Product Safety Commission require safety locks on all nightstands next?


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5015 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by steve495:

I do everything I can to find and buy batteries without that coating.
What brand(s) have you found, that do not have the coating?



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31818 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BB61:
We joke but I know a guy who had a small daughter ingest one and die a couple of years ago.


Unattended children die from all sorts of things. This is not the fault of the battery, nor SIG Sauer. The fact that the government seems to think that the company is at fault for not telling consumers the obvious, to not eat the batteries is the problem.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37355 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Who is feeding their kids these things? When I first heard about a coating they put on the batteries to make them taste bad, I thought it was a joke.

I agree with jljones about who it at fault, the parents.
 
Posts: 7256 | Location: Treasure Coast,Fl. | Registered: July 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Yup, the jokes are about the ridiculousness of the forced recall. It has nothing to do with the act of the children getting into things. No amount of feel good regulations will prevent a tragedy from happening.


Q






 
Posts: 28478 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of steve495
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
quote:
Originally posted by steve495:

I do everything I can to find and buy batteries without that coating.
What brand(s) have you found, that do not have the coating?


Duracell definitely has the coating and says so on the packaging. I think Energizer did not at the time. Off-brands like Amazon did not. I think Energizer is doing different child proof packaging instead of the coating.


Steve


Small Business Website Design & Maintenance - https://spidercreations.net | OpSpec Training - https://opspectraining.com | Grayguns - https://grayguns.com

Evil exists. You can not negotiate with, bribe or placate evil. You're not going to be able to have it sit down with Dr. Phil for an anger management session either.
 
Posts: 5044 | Location: Windsor Locks, Conn. | Registered: July 18, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
That child proof packaging has probably resulted in more injuries from trying to cut it open than kids consuming batteries...
 
Posts: 9698 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because something is legal to do doesn't mean it is the smart thing to do.
posted Hide Post
Cut fingers can heal, injuries from swallowed batteries not so much.


Integrity is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking.
 
Posts: 4324 | Location: Metamora MI | Registered: October 31, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Romeo 5 recall

© SIGforum 2024