Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
A guy steals a $100 bill from a grocery store. The guy then buys a $70 gift card with the stolen money and gets $30 back in change. How much did the store lose? | ||
|
Member |
$200 | |||
|
Member |
My thought as well $100 stolen $70 bought with stolen funds $30 further lost in 'change' Editing after some below responses: $100 stolen $70 returned on purchase Net $30 loss $30 given as change Net $60 loss plus cost of good purchased. The Enemy's gate is down. | |||
|
A Grateful American |
$0. "the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" ✡ Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב! | |||
|
Member |
Hmmm, not knowing the cost that the store had in the $70 purchase, the answer is indeterminable? | |||
|
Ol' Jack always says... what the hell. |
$170 | |||
|
Member |
I knew someone would go this deep. I’ll change the wording a bit | |||
|
Still finding my way |
Yup. $30 plus cost on goods sold. | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
$100 is the loss $100 Stolen and then that $100 is Returned net loss is $0.00 The loss is $100 made up of the $70 card and the $30 cash back... The $100 of goods includes cost of goods, overhead and profit. | |||
|
Happiness is Vectored Thrust |
$100 Icarus flew too close to the sun, but at least he flew. | |||
|
Member |
I say $100 The original $100 was given back and he stole the $70 plus $30 | |||
|
Fire begets Fire |
I need to figure in the cost of inflation during the time he held $100 bill before he purchased anything. Then, we forgot about the government taking their fair share. Oh, then the breakage on the card… Everyone losses $$$. "Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty." ~Robert A. Heinlein | |||
|
Optimistic Cynic |
Another factor adding to the indeterminably is whether the gift card is redeemable only in the referenced store. And aren't there fees associated with the purchase of gift cards? | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
Now for tax purposes, the loss is $200..... | |||
|
Ol' Jack always says... what the hell. |
You need to consider the $100 he originally stole paid for goods that are already sold. So the original $100 plus the $70 gift card = $170. That leftover $30 is still part of the original $100. | |||
|
On the wrong side of the Mobius strip |
Was the gift card bought from the grocery store that the $100 bill was stolen from? If not, the grocery store is out $100. | |||
|
Member |
$130? $100 stolen + $30 change. $70 gift card is product sold? ETA: leaning toward $100 now.... $100 stolen. $100 tendered (doesn't matter if stolen or new); $70 good provided, $30 change. Orthogonal transactions. Another perspective - the thief stole $100. He ended up with $100 worth of stuff ($70 gift card, $30 cash).This message has been edited. Last edited by: konata88, "Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it." L.Tolstoy "A government is just a body of people, usually, notably, ungoverned." Shepherd Book | |||
|
Member |
Hmmm… that’s some thinking right there | |||
|
Lost |
Going with $100, final answer. | |||
|
Run Silent Run Deep |
$130 _____________________________ Pledge allegiance or pack your bag! The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher Spread my work ethic, not my wealth | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |