quote:

Originally posted by jhe888:

quote:

Originally posted by tleddy:
https://www.rollingstone.com/p...onald-trump-1353509/

“ The Buffalo Shooter Isn’t a ‘Lone Wolf.’ He’s a Mainstream Republican
The right-wing extremists who control the modern GOP are all gripped by a racist delusion. The shooter is just the latest to act on it”

I am incredibly offended by the accusation and nothing I can do about it!

It is time to remove protections from legal action from the media. Any ideas how to do that?

Repeal the free speech parts of the First Amendment.

quote:

Originally posted by Edmond:
Rolling stone is a fucking joke.

Do they talk about the black on black shootings that occur daily in the inner cities?

One thing for sure: if the media does not mention the race or political leaning of the criminal, we already know.

quote:

Repeal the free speech parts of the First Amendment.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
At this point one would have to be an ignoramus and/or aligned with the Left to believe that.

quote:

As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology.

quote:

Originally posted by HRK:

quote:

As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology.

Well, the farther left you go, the farther right the other side looks... Even if they don't move...

quote:

Originally posted by Fredward:
FCC section 230 is the rule used to make the press immune (nearly) from slander lawsuits. It needs to be eliminated. You should be able to say anything you want and be free from prosecution, but not lawsuits. It's slowly changing, I think.

quote:

Originally posted by Fredward:
FCC section 230 is the rule used to make the press immune (nearly) from slander lawsuits. It needs to be eliminated. You should be able to say anything you want and be free from prosecution, but not lawsuits. It's slowly changing, I think.

quote:

(2)Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—
(A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).

quote:

Originally posted by hjs157:

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
At this point one would have to be an ignoramus and/or aligned with the Left to believe that.

In a conversation with a friend, I used the term political disorientation to describe how far removed from reality many of those on the political left have become. Similar to an aviator experiencing spatial disorientation, the modern leftists is unable to determine his/her true position in relationship to the Constitution. As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology. While the Marxist leadership intentionally moves the goal post to solidify their evil plan, most of their useful idiot drum thumpers fail to realize or even comprehend the illusion. Unaware of how far removed they are from traditional America, they are incapable of distinguishing between a mainstream Republican and a homicidal maniac.