SIGforum
I am a Main Stream Republican, just your average racist murderer - see below
May 20, 2022, 02:44 PM
HRKI am a Main Stream Republican, just your average racist murderer - see below
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
quote:
Originally posted by tleddy:
https://www.rollingstone.com/p...onald-trump-1353509/“ The Buffalo Shooter Isn’t a ‘Lone Wolf.’ He’s a Mainstream Republican
The right-wing extremists who control the modern GOP are all gripped by a racist delusion. The shooter is just the latest to act on it”
I am incredibly offended by the accusation and nothing I can do about it!
It is time to remove protections from legal action from the media. Any ideas how to do that?
Repeal the free speech parts of the First Amendment.
Wouldn't it be better to have a Czar of some kind, maybe a Disinformation Czar
May 20, 2022, 02:54 PM
YooperSigsThe Rolling Stone article is just one more lie in a sea of lies.
End of Earth: 2 Miles
Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
May 20, 2022, 03:12 PM
lymanquote:
Originally posted by Edmond:
Rolling stone is a fucking joke.
Do they talk about the black on black shootings that occur daily in the inner cities?
One thing for sure: if the media does not mention the race or political leaning of the criminal, we already know.
they need to stick to actual music news and drop the rest
woulda thought they would have learned that after the piss poor reporting they did about UVA and frats etc
https://chandlersfirearms.com/chesterfield-armament/
May 20, 2022, 03:23 PM
PASigRolling Stone has been political leftist crap for years now, do they even cover music anymore? I don’t think so.
May 20, 2022, 03:34 PM
Veeperquote:
Repeal the free speech parts of the First Amendment.
Isn't that what "Hate Speech" laws do?
“The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it.”—H.L. Mencken May 20, 2022, 03:52 PM
hjs157quote:
Originally posted by darthfuster:
At this point one would have to be an ignoramus and/or aligned with the Left to believe that.
In a conversation with a friend, I used the term
political disorientation to describe how far removed from reality many of those on the political left have become. Similar to an aviator experiencing spatial disorientation, the modern leftists is unable to determine his/her true position in relationship to the Constitution. As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology. While the Marxist leadership intentionally moves the goal post to solidify their evil plan, most of their useful idiot drum thumpers fail to realize or even comprehend the illusion. Unaware of how far removed they are from traditional America, they are incapable of distinguishing between a mainstream Republican and a homicidal maniac.
May 20, 2022, 04:07 PM
HRKquote:
As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology.
Well, the farther left you go, the farther right the other side looks... Even if they don't move...
May 20, 2022, 04:43 PM
hjs157quote:
Originally posted by HRK:
quote:
As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology.
Well, the farther left you go, the farther right the other side looks... Even if they don't move...
Correct. The problem is many on the left don't believe
they are moving.
May 20, 2022, 06:38 PM
Kenpoistquote:
Originally posted by Fredward:
FCC section 230 is the rule used to make the press immune (nearly) from slander lawsuits. It needs to be eliminated. You should be able to say anything you want and be free from prosecution, but not lawsuits. It's slowly changing, I think.
Imagine the suits against Fox News, etc.
May 20, 2022, 09:14 PM
sjtillIf they're not calling you a racist, you're not speaking up enough!
_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
May 20, 2022, 09:28 PM
car541quote:
Originally posted by Fredward:
FCC section 230 is the rule used to make the press immune (nearly) from slander lawsuits. It needs to be eliminated. You should be able to say anything you want and be free from prosecution, but not lawsuits. It's slowly changing, I think.
No, it isnt. The section 230 arguments are about allowing online providers to censor material with impunity, it is not about freedom of the press.
Section 230 is this
https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...0to%20our%20citizens.
When people discuss repeaking section 230, they are referring to a section of 47 USC which protects internet message providers from civil liability for censoring material. The text is below
quote:
(2)Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—
(A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).
The rules on slander lawsuits against persons in the public domain were established in NY Times V. Sullivan in 1964. That is not a statutory law provision, but rather a court case.
You may read it here:
https://scholar.google.com/sch...as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
*****************************
"I don't own the night, I only operate a small franchise" - Author unknown
May 20, 2022, 10:13 PM
darthfusterCollective condemnation is the corner stone of the genocidal mindset. This is how every atrocity begins.
You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier May 20, 2022, 10:15 PM
corsairquote:
Originally posted by hjs157:
quote:
Originally posted by darthfuster:
At this point one would have to be an ignoramus and/or aligned with the Left to believe that.
In a conversation with a friend, I used the term
political disorientation to describe how far removed from reality many of those on the political left have become. Similar to an aviator experiencing spatial disorientation, the modern leftists is unable to determine his/her true position in relationship to the Constitution. As a result, they perceive those on the right to be further and further extreme in their ideology. While the Marxist leadership intentionally moves the goal post to solidify their evil plan, most of their useful idiot drum thumpers fail to realize or even comprehend the illusion. Unaware of how far removed they are from traditional America, they are incapable of distinguishing between a mainstream Republican and a homicidal maniac.
You've described the
Overton Window