SIGforum
China applies to launch nearly 200,000 satellites

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/320601935/m/2830070915

January 15, 2026, 07:47 AM
Pipe Smoker
China applies to launch nearly 200,000 satellites
Worrisome.

“China has applied to launch almost 200,000 satellites into space, sparking concerns that the nation seeks to build a 'mega-constellation'.

On December 29, a newly formed body called the Institute of Radio Spectrum Utilisation and Technological Innovation filed applications for two satellite constellations.

Each of these enormous collections of spacecraft, dubbed CTC-1 and CTC-2, would contain 96,714 satellites spread over 3,660 different orbits.

If completed, China's new mega-constellation would dwarf even SpaceX's bold ambition to put 49,000 Starlink satellites in orbit.

As reported by China in Space, the Nanjing University of Aeronautics claims that the satellites will focus on: 'Low-altitude electromagnetic space security, integrated security defence systems, electromagnetic space security assessment of airspace, and low-altitude airspace safety supervision services.'

DailyMail article:
https://mol.im/a/15466149



Serious about crackers.
January 15, 2026, 08:04 AM
Gustofer
This could be a problem for amateur radio. Hopefully their request gets denied.

Currently there are about 12,000 satellites up there. Imagine another 200,000 of them (in addition to the 90,000 that Musk wants up there).

I don't like it.


________________________________________________________
It is long past time for a Convention of States. The Founding Fathers gave us this tool to fix an out of control government and we need to use it.
January 15, 2026, 08:43 AM
Paten
Applied to who? The UN.

quote:
These applications were filed with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body that allocates spectrum allowances in space.


If the UN says no, what's to stop China from doing it anyway?
January 15, 2026, 09:08 AM
sigfreund
Anton Petrov has a video discussing the idea that space close to Earth could become so crowded with orbital satellites, junk, and debris as to make sending people into space unacceptably dangerous. That caused me to think again about the Fermi paradox and why we haven’t been visited by space aliens. If other species cluttered the area around their planet to the point that they couldn’t leave safely, they obviously wouldn’t be developing interstellar travel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b66ZZ05wKC0&t=130s




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
January 15, 2026, 09:48 AM
sgalczyn
Forget plastic in the oceans.....time to dredge space!


"No matter where you go - there you are"
January 15, 2026, 10:23 AM
Schmelby
quote:
Originally posted by Paten:
Applied to who? The UN.

quote:
These applications were filed with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body that allocates spectrum allowances in space.


If the UN says no, what's to stop China from doing it anyway?


This was my first thought as well. China is not going to ask permission from anyone.
The United States should get out of the UN and NATO.
January 15, 2026, 10:35 AM
RichardC
" 'Low-altitude electromagnetic space security, integrated security defence systems, electromagnetic space security assessment of airspace, and low-altitude airspace safety supervision services.'
"

Sounds peaceful, and for the good of all mankind.
January 15, 2026, 10:43 AM
berto
The UN? Seriously? When has the debate club ever stopped anything? What happens if they say no and China launches anyway? China has veto power on the security council. Better fire up the space laser.
January 15, 2026, 10:52 AM
FenderBender
quote:
Originally posted by Paten:
Applied to who? The UN.

quote:
These applications were filed with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body that allocates spectrum allowances in space.


If the UN says no, what's to stop China from doing it anyway?


Ideally the rest of the security council.


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
January 15, 2026, 11:52 AM
Pipe Smoker
If China carries out their plan the late evening and early morning dark skies will be ruined.



Serious about crackers.
January 15, 2026, 02:26 PM
gearhounds





“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
January 15, 2026, 02:39 PM
ThunTiger
https://platform.leolabs.space....space/visualization
This link is to the active visualization of the TRACKED orbital debris. It shows the scope of the issue.

This is a good paper on current debris levels and the tracking of it. There will inevitably be collisions in the future.

Humans managed to put an incredible amount of debris into orbit and a lot of it isn’t coming down anytime soon. I think a lot of people would be shocked at how fragile the ISS.

It’s like Mount Everest on a planet sized scale; the destination is so far and challenging to reach that you have to accept leaving permanent debris in your wake. And, no one is going to want to foot the bill to clean up.

Maybe having a permanent armed presence in space will spur some clearing of debris in orbit for personnel safety. Some way of degrading the orbit or debris to burn up would have to be applied. “Orbital Debris Removal” would be a a cool MOS.


200,000 sounds like propaganda numbers but China has always played the numbers game. They could care less about how many tons of debris they leave in orbit. Chinese production would also have to keep up with satellite attrition in orbit and during any launch failures. They would have to make production large scale to produce enough.

It sounds ridiculous but they could offer “subscription” satellite services to states and other actors that couldn’t otherwise afford the outlay of capital to start a satellite intelligence agency or direct satellite support for their military/intelligence operations. That would pay for satellites in orbit and also allow
Beijing to flex some political control. A dictator who successfully suppresses a coup or a Beijing supported group getting active satellite support during their operations would pay well for services that otherwise would only be available to their enemies.

This is just a new technology and frontier.



I think I’m going to go watch Space Cowboys.
January 15, 2026, 02:47 PM
Muddflap
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets.
January 15, 2026, 03:29 PM
ThunTiger
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
If China carries out their plan the late evening and early morning dark skies will be ruined.


Stargazing with some families this last year at our place made me realize something that made me feel like an old man.

An entire generation has grown up with satellites and the ISS regularly in their field of view looking through the telescope. There is so much man made in the night sky it’s arguably never going back.


Also that I need to bite the bullet and get Starlink.
January 15, 2026, 03:48 PM
FenderBender
quote:
Originally posted by ThunTiger:

This link is to the active visualization of the TRACKED orbital debris. It shows the scope of the issue.
.

corrected link


That's really neat!


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
January 15, 2026, 05:43 PM
Hamden106
My parents were stargazing on the back porch. They saw a strange light cross the night sky. The next day Sputnik was announced to the world



SIGnature
NRA Benefactor CMP Pistol Distinguished
January 16, 2026, 09:31 AM
Fly-Sig
Back in the 1960's in NJ, the skies were dark and the stars brilliant. It was a treat to see a satellite pass by. There were published schedules that hobbyists had to identify which satellite they were seeing.
January 16, 2026, 09:57 AM
chellim1
quote:
Originally posted by Paten:
Applied to who? The UN.
quote:
These applications were filed with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body that allocates spectrum allowances in space.

If the UN says no, what's to stop China from doing it anyway?

That was going to be my question: Applied to who?
Is Earth a member of some inter-galactic agency we earthlings are unaware of and didn't vote for?
Oh, the UN? What a joke!



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
January 16, 2026, 11:20 AM
Rey HRH
quote:
Originally posted by FenderBender:
quote:
Originally posted by Paten:
Applied to who? The UN.

quote:
These applications were filed with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body that allocates spectrum allowances in space.


If the UN says no, what's to stop China from doing it anyway?


Ideally the rest of the security council.


Umm, China is a permanent member of the UN security council. Permanent members have veto power which means the security council, as a body, can’t do jack shit if one permanent member doesn’t go along.



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
January 16, 2026, 07:48 PM
wrightd
China knows no rules or agreements or consideration of any kind. They will do everything they want to do in space that they can get away with.

I heard the space junk tracking systems will at some point not be able keep up in some way, and after a certain inflection point in the density of working satellites, it will become more difficult to put up any more, and compromise the viability of future launches and space travel.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster