SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    It’s Official, They Are Making Ghettos in San Diego
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
It’s Official, They Are Making Ghettos in San Diego Login/Join 
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted
https://fox5sandiego.com/news/...ilable-in-san-diego/

Just as wealth breeds rich people, and those who abide by the law a safe city; this ultra low-income income high rise is bad for the community, just as we see in Chicago’s projects and other ultra low income housing built since LBJ…






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
So, there was no low-income housing at all in SD before this?


Q






 
Posts: 28224 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
So, there was no low-income housing at all in SD before this?


Yes and no.

Typically spread out as part of a development. Ie, 3% of units (or whatever) are Section 8 (low income).

Puts financially challenged people ("poor" is subjective) in finically richer areas.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 110088 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Which of these nine separate developments is a 'high rise'?

Besides the senior housing...are any these any different than the standard 2-3 story project/faux townhouse?

Looking at Fallbrook location for example...that location is a shoebox of a lot, in downtown, that is two-doors away from the Sheriff Dept.
 
Posts: 15195 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
One wonders if a portion of these will be for our newest “citizens” with more pouring in every day… rather than people already there.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 15994 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
Which of these nine separate developments is a 'high rise'?

Besides the senior housing...are any these any different than the standard 2-3 story project?

Looking at Fallbrook location for example...that location is a shoebox of a lot, in downtown, that is two-doors away from the Sheriff Dept.


In San Diego speak it translates to, "all of these will be located when we mean.”

Going to sound backwards but bear with me






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
In San Diego speak it is saying all and each of those locations will have 100% of the residents we describe.

So it is not a question of "which" in San Diego, the real question is where are the other places not meeting 100% of the stipulation because, those other ares mught meet the Section 8 requirement






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
The places in the article meet a stipulation of 100% of the occupants are in the "ultra-low" economic category






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
Which the Projects and other same type areas have proven don’t work.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
I don't get it? It lists 10-50 units per building. It's not like they are building a sixteen building complex of 12 story buildings with 300 units per building.

I am pretty sure they abandoned the idea of projects long ago. These units are probably only 4-5% of the total units in the building.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21342 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Fucking affordable housing, Its a lie.

Im an ex SD native and serving time here on what I thought was the perfect PNW town.

No two shits are given unless it involves .gov money.

Then you end up with 2 usable units and the rest are pure shit and will eventually get converted to higher end housing via tax payer


___________________________________Sigforum - port in the fake news storm.____________Be kind to the Homeless. A lot of us are one bad decision away from there.
 
Posts: 1169 | Registered: July 20, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by highroundcount:
Fucking affordable housing, Its a lie.

I'm an ex SD native and serving time here on what I thought was the perfect PNW town.

No two shits are given unless it involves .gov money.

meanwhile..The ones searching for affordable housing....,,,Barter town exists. Master runs it, Blaster secures it. Bust the deal, face the wheel

tTen you end up with 2 usable units and the rest are pure shit and will eventually get converted to higher end housing via tax payer


___________________________________Sigforum - port in the fake news storm.____________Be kind to the Homeless. A lot of us are one bad decision away from there.
 
Posts: 1169 | Registered: July 20, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
Which of these nine separate developments is a 'high rise'?

Besides the senior housing...are any these any different than the standard 2-3 story project?

Looking at Fallbrook location for example...that location is a shoebox of a lot, in downtown, that is two-doors away from the Sheriff Dept.

In San Diego speak it translates to, "all of these will be located when we mean.”

Going to sound backwards but bear with me...

In San Diego speak it is saying all and each of those locations will have 100% of the residents we describe.

So it is not a question of "which" in San Diego, the real question is where are the other places not meeting 100% of the stipulation because, those other areas might meet the Section 8 requirement

The places in the article meet a stipulation of 100% of the occupants are in the "ultra-low" economic category

Which the Projects and other same type areas have proven don’t work.

FIFY... Wink


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 9660 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
What hi-rise low income projects in Chicago are you comparing this to? Cabrini-Green was over 3,500 units in one small area and all built before LBJ. The hi-rise and mid-rise have since been demolished. Pruitt–Igoe, about 3,000 units in St. Louis was also built well before LBJ and all demolished by 1976. Truman, on the other hand, thought these were great ideas. Fun fact, the ghettos were already in those locations before the projects were built. The projects were seen at the time as a solution to those ghettos.

It doesn’t sound like San Diego is planning anything like this.
 
Posts: 12014 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thank you nhrhcraft

I don't communicate very well. But you are correct


___________________________________Sigforum - port in the fake news storm.____________Be kind to the Homeless. A lot of us are one bad decision away from there.
 
Posts: 1169 | Registered: July 20, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhracecraft:
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
Which of these nine separate developments is a 'high rise'?

Besides the senior housing...are any these any different than the standard 2-3 story project?

Looking at Fallbrook location for example...that location is a shoebox of a lot, in downtown, that is two-doors away from the Sheriff Dept.

In San Diego speak it translates to, "all of these will be located when we mean.”

Going to sound backwards but bear with me...

In San Diego speak it is saying all and each of those locations will have 100% of the residents we describe.

So it is not a question of "which" in San Diego, the real question is where are the other places not meeting 100% of the stipulation because, those other areas might meet the Section 8 requirement

The places in the article meet a stipulation of 100% of the occupants are in the "ultra-low" economic category

Which the Projects and other same type areas have proven don’t work.

FIFY... Wink


What am I missing? I don’t see you emphasis.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
^^^Just the distinct economy of space on the page when all five posts are combined into a single post! The last two could/should have simply been separated by a comma...


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 9660 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
He's pointing out that there's no need to post multiple additional single-sentence posts when you want to add on to your existing thoughts, if nobody has posted anything in the interim.

(Especially when you have a ginormous signature like yours that takes up at least 14 rows of text, thus adding at least 15 new rows of text, plus the space needed to display the date/post count/name/avatar/etc., just to post one short line. Then repeating that four times in a row.)

Instead, the forum allows you to edit your previous post to add on additional information. So all that could have been edited in to add to your initial 6:17pm post, and be contained in one single short(er) post, as demonstrated by nhracecraft in his post.
 
Posts: 33464 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
“The poor carry their poverty on their backs.”

My recollection of the quote. I tried to find the actual quote on the web, but found nothing but leftest homilies. Dozens of them.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9700 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    It’s Official, They Are Making Ghettos in San Diego

© SIGforum 2024