SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Japan asks US Marines to deploy F-35’s on their largest warships
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Japan asks US Marines to deploy F-35’s on their largest warships Login/Join 
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?...


The Japanese speak Navajo now... Big Grin




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44685 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of
Fine Avatars
Picture of Orguss
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?...

The Japanese speak Navajo now... Big Grin

Is it so hard to give a straight answer? You so rarely do.

quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?

I'm sure they have someone who speaks English, but do Japanese ATCs learn some sort of standard lingo, or do they have their own that the Marines would need to learn?

English is the official language of air traffic controllers for most of the world, I believe. I'm sure that applies to the military, as well. And when you consider that we've been conducting military exercises with our Asian allies for decades, it's easy to assume there would be little difficulty in U.S. crews conducting operations off foreign platforms.



"I'm yet another resource-consuming kid in an overpopulated planet raised to an alarming extent by Hollywood and Madison Avenue, poised with my cynical and alienated peers to take over the world when you're old and weak!" - Calvin, "Calvin & Hobbes"
 
Posts: 18121 | Location: Sonoma County, CA | Registered: April 09, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Res ipsa loquitur
Picture of BB61
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?


As someone who has lived in Korea for two years and has friends who have spent a lot of time in Japan, English is almost the national pastime over there. I imagine they will assign personnel who will speak better English than many US citizens. Seriously.


__________________________

 
Posts: 12660 | Registered: October 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
Until they can get their new battleship and fighters deployed







Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 38469 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Seeker of Clarity
Picture of r0gue
posted Hide Post
I think they're due for some new airplanes.





 
Posts: 11468 | Registered: August 02, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jman78
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Veeper:
Hey Japan - Can I make a serious suggestion?

https://macross.fandom.com/wiki/Variable_Fighter


They need to buy all the old F14’s and start building VF-1A, J and S versions.
 
Posts: 186 | Location: Victorville, CA | Registered: April 27, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIGforum's Berlin
Correspondent
Picture of BansheeOne
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LDD:
Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution prohibits "offensive weapons" commonly interpreted to include aircraft carriers.

That is why their current carriers are officially helicopter carriers destroyers.


Or even more precisely, the Japanese term for their modern destroyer-type ships is goeikan, "escort". When the plans were announced to operate F-35s off the Izumo class, it was also redesignated "multi-purpose operations destroyers/escorts". Totally not a carrier, you see.

There is clearly a Japanese need for such a capability. China by now hasn't just Liaoning, ex Varyag, but also their rather similar first indigenous carrier (Type 001A) on sea trials, a bigger Kitty-Hawk-sized Type 002 on the slips to be launched next year, and reportedly started cutting metal for a nuclear-powered Type 003 supercarrier planned for the next decade. Additionally, they have the first of three planned Wasp-sized Type 075 LHDs under construction, though those will likely carry only helicopters since no Chinese VTOL fighter project is known.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has long tried to have Article 9 revised, but has met with considerable resistance both domestically and among neighbors in light of his broader revisionist politics regarding the pre-1945 role of the country. The latter is not just China; relations with South Korea have recently escalated into a proper trade war over long-simmering issues like Korean "comfort women" in WW II and mutual claims on the ROK-controlled Dokdo/Takeshima Islands. In fact South Korea has its own plans for a pair of LPHs twice the size of its current Dokdo class, which could operate F-35s. That's probably aimed as much against Japan as against China.
 
Posts: 2465 | Location: Berlin, Germany | Registered: April 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Orguss:
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?...

The Japanese speak Navajo now... Big Grin

Is it so hard to give a straight answer? You so rarely do....


Tissue?

I give plenty of straight, factual and honest input. I also make a joke whenever I can. A good many appreciate it. It's like a flower, one can choose to partake of its beauty or ignore it, the flower does not care, but the one passing by is either blessed or not by their response to the thing.

There is a flood of "straight" information assailing our senses from every way possible, and some folks need a chuckle.

I can be the most vile and offensive person if it is warranted, but I rather go for funny, even when I miss the swinging trapeze and fall flat on my ass, I am sure someone will even point and laugh.


As for the "Navajo" remark, is was a joke on the "Code Talkers" in the Pacific during WWII, and I think it clever, we could take a poll and ask for straight answers.

But it wouldn't be funny.

Now, back to the hilarity...




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44685 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
So are the Japs going to pay for this or are we footing the bill?
 
Posts: 23407 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
So are the Japs going to pay for this or are we footing the bill?


Japs were the bastards we defeated 74 years ago.

I don't think using a slur like that would go over well with them today.

This is all about sending a message to China and it's a good move if you ask me.


 
Posts: 35139 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
Posts: 3239 | Location: Middle Earth, Rivendell | Registered: November 13, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PASig:

I don't think using a slur like that would go over well with them today.



Slur? Confused

So if we are called Yanks then we are slurred?
FWIW, doesn't bother me in the least.

You kids get triggered so easily now days. Eek
 
Posts: 23407 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Still finding my way
Picture of Ryanp225
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PASig:
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
So are the Japs going to pay for this or are we footing the bill?


Japs were the bastards we defeated 74 years ago.

I don't think using a slur like that would go over well with them today.

This is all about sending a message to China and it's a good move if you ask me.

In proper context I believe it to simply be an abbreviation of Japanese. I don't see it as a slur but given the history I can see why some would take offense.
 
Posts: 10851 | Registered: January 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Still finding my way
Picture of Ryanp225
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by Oat_Action_Man:
How would a Japanese ship be with air traffic control communication to an American pilot?...


The Japanese speak Navajo now... Big Grin


Don't ever change. Cool
 
Posts: 10851 | Registered: January 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by PASig:

I don't think using a slur like that would go over well with them today.



Slur? Confused

So if we are called Yanks then we are slurred?
FWIW, doesn't bother me in the least.

You kids get triggered so easily now days. Eek


I think there is a general consensus of what *is* and what *isn't* a slur.

"Japs," "Nips," and "Krauts" are slurs. "Jerrys," "Tommies," and "Yanks" are not slurs.

I don't hold contempt for the Japanese in WWII, just as I don't hold the Germans in contempt. They are both good allies now, and have been for the past 70 years. So, it's not that we are 'triggered' (save that for the snowflake leftists) - we are just disinclined to hear slurs against our good allies.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21965 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hound Dog:


I think there is a general consensus of what *is* and what *isn't* a slur.

"Japs," "Nips," and "Krauts" are slurs. "Jerrys," "Tommies," and "Yanks" are not slurs.


Consensus huh?
Guess I didn't get the SJW memo on that.
PC culture is taking over the world.
Can't a word just be a simiple synonym or do you have to read the handbook of preferred pronouns first? Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 23407 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
Consensus huh?
Guess I didn't get the SJW memo on that.
PC culture is taking over the world.


Dude. "Jap" and "Japs" has been a slur for years now.

It's got nothing to do with SJW's.


 
Posts: 35139 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PASig:
"Jap" and "Japs" has been a slur for years now.


Not to me, I always liked the Japs.
 
Posts: 23407 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by PASig:
"Jap" and "Japs" has been a slur for years now.


Not to me, I always liked the Japs.

Is that what you call your friends who are Japanese?
Nobody has ever used 'Japs' as a term of endearment or, even playful ribbing. It's a slur and always has been. WWII ended 70 odd years ago, it's over with.
 
Posts: 15181 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:

Is that what you call your friends who are Japanese?
Nobody has ever used 'Japs' as a term of endearment or, even playful ribbing. It's a slur and always has been.
WWII ended 70 odd years ago, it's over with.


Of course, what does WW2 have to do with anything?
Jap is just short for Japanese, nothing more, nothing less.
I ❤ Japs.
 
Posts: 23407 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Japan asks US Marines to deploy F-35’s on their largest warships

© SIGforum 2024