Does anyone here click on a title that looks interesting to them and then back out after the third or fourth paragraph? Realizing there is another 3 or 4 to go?
|I Deal In Lead|
Absolutely. I do it every time.
Some people need to be more succinct.
If it takes more than three sentences, I'm out.
|Shall Not Be Infringed|
NEVER, as I utilize a PC for reading/perusing SIGforum! Excluding the rare circumstances where I feel compelled to capture a spectacular MEME or other important content so I can forward it to someone via text, I almost exclusively access SIGforum on a PC. Additionally, some rants are complex and/or need background/context to communicate w/ clarity, and as such, cannot be communicated succinctly, especially if one is 'pitching their bitch' in Epic Rant style.
This 'rant re: rants' seems to be another example of members complaining about being inconvenienced while viewing SIGforum on a cell phone...Just Sayin'
If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Save America!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
Depends on the subject and the poster, or the content as in when an extensive first post includes the embedding of an article,
Many users have asked it be done since they can't click on the links at work and see the article
Examples are WSJ subscription based articles. If they didn't copy paste into the post most couldn't read it.
|The Unmanned Writer|
Personally I dislike the two question rants, but that’s just me.
Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Only in an insane world are the sane considered insane.
The memories of a man in his old age
Are the deeds of a man in his prime
Long rants are fine as long as the author/OP understands the concept of a paragraph and proper sentence structure, i.e., the collective thoughts that form a paragraph. Yeah...I'm a grammar nazi, too. I've opened some threads and the post was 2 feet long on my wide screen monitor; all one, continuous paragraph rife with run-on sentences. That's when I think to myself, "TLDR". *click* [close]
"If you’re a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too…” – MAJ Richard D. Winters (1918-2011), E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne
"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil... Therefore, as tongues of fire lick up straw and as dry grass sinks down in the flames, so their roots will decay and their flowers blow away like dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the word of the Holy One of Israel." - Isaiah 5:20,24
It doesn’t bother me. You need context. I don’t live by the Twatter creed.
OK, so we got a trooper pulls someone over, we got a shooting, these folks drive by, there's a high-speed pursuit, ends here and then this execution-type deal.
As long as the content of a post is substantive, it can be twenty paragraphs as far as I'm concerned.
Some people write well enough to engage readers for an extended period. Not everyone possesses this ability. The reader alone determines if a post is worth their time.
"In the entire history of mankind, there has never been a political elite sincerely concerned about the well-being of regular people. What makes any of us think that it is different now?" - Christine Anderson, Member of the European Parliament for Germany
If the post catches my interest, I read all of it. I joined SF to see what everyone has say.
End of Earth: 2 Miles
Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
|I can't tell if I'm |
tired, or just lazy
Most of the time I don't get past the thread title, but when I do, if I'm not hooked in the first few sentences, I move on.
"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."
“ And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade that, with it, Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits in Thy mercy."
And the Lord did grin, and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals and fruit bats and large chu--”
“Skip a bit, brother”
Demand not that events should happen as you wish; but wish them to happen as they do happen, and you will go on well. -Epictetus
If it holds my attention I'll read the whole thing.
Sometimes rants take a bit to explain.
I'd rather be hated for who I am than loved for who I'm not.
My first though, as well.
A wall of text is a quick trip to the 'back' button.
The Enemy's gate is down.
If it's too much - I just go to the 1st few post following to get a reason to go back and read it. Some need to be longer - SF, Home sweet Home.
Fantastic Sir! Bravo!
Yes, Para does appreciate humor.
This ^^^^^, in spades.
Even a short wall-of-text will cause me to either read the opening, skip to the end in hopes of getting the gist of the point, or skip the whole thing entirely.
I'm verbose. I know this. So I go to great lengths to try to do what erj_pilot describes, and make each "whole thought" as succinct as possible.
I try to set out the opening subject, succinctly, at the very beginning and wrap it up nicely in the last--so readers can skim/skip the middle and still get the gist of my remarks.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
"The dominant media is no more ``mainstream`` than leftists are liberals." -- me
|quarter MOA visionary|
Whenever it goes page (computer page) after page and drags out I will usually bail.
My attention span isn't strong enough to handle monotony.
But all that's on me not the OP so feel free to do as you please, maybe when I am bored I will dive in.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2|