SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Non "Assault Weapon", semiautomatic, magazine fed carbine/rifle for a 95lb girl?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Non "Assault Weapon", semiautomatic, magazine fed carbine/rifle for a 95lb girl? Login/Join 
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted
My wife is 95 lbs and 5'2". She's going to be a massive tactical liability when the next big earthquake puts 20 million people 3 meals away from civil unrest. I'm hoping to change that.

I have a 10/22 that I intend to have her practice on. My idea is to have her complete an Appleseed shoot early this year, then graduate her to a self-defense caliber carbine/rifle that she can use in a tactical class.

My requirements for her firearm is that it be:

1) Lightweight
2) Low recoil
3) Fast handling/easy pointing
4) Fed from a detachable 10-round magazine
5) Semi-Auto
6) No pistol grip, no flash suppressor (muzzle brake OK), no forward pistol grip,

Bonus Points for being classy/traditional looking to maintain a PC/unassuming threat profile. She's small, she's unassuming, would be nice to use that to her advantage.

Guns I have found that fit the above criteria (without actually handling any of the weapons) are:

1) Ruger PC Carbine in 9mm or .40 (all my handguns are currently standardized on .40, but will drop to a 9mm for recoil reasons if necessary).

2) Ruger Mini-14

3) Keltec SU-16CA

4) Kriss Vector CRB. This one doesn't really hit feature 6 and the bonus requirement, but can be made to work with a kydex wrap around the pistol grip. Intrigued because of the supposed low recoil system.

Let me know if I've missed anything for consideration. Thanks in advance for the discussion!
 
Posts: 10517 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of craigcpa
posted Hide Post
Benelli MR1. Came in a "standard rifle" configuration (had a second configuration with pistol grip, etc.), and was said to be quite comfortable to shoot. No longer made, so you'll have to look at GB.


==========================================
Just my 2¢
____________________________

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right ♫♫♫
 
Posts: 7120 | Location: Raleighwood | Registered: June 27, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Leemur
posted Hide Post
No on the Keltec. The PC carbine sounds like a winner to me.
 
Posts: 11423 | Location: Shenandoah Valley, VA | Registered: October 16, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of FALna45
posted Hide Post
I think a fancied up m1 carbine would fit the bill and the 10/22 can be set up nearly identical.
nicely blued and in a stock like this example from Dean restorations maybe....(I have no affiliation just found it on a image search).....

http://www.dgrguns.com/Jenkins%20KCD.jpg


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
yeah, i can teach you how to read the book of life...
or you can just look at the pictures if you like
 
Posts: 198 | Location: SE MI | Registered: February 11, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FALna45:
I think a fancied up m1 carbine would fit the bill and the 10/22 can be set up nearly identical.
nicely blued and in a stock like this example from Dean restorations maybe....(I have no affiliation just found it on a image search).....

http://www.dgrguns.com/Jenkins%20KCD.jpg


I'd agree with this: more power than a Ruger PC.

Just as long as you get one that doesn't have a bayonet lug--IIRC that's also a banned feature under CA's AWB.

M1 carbine makes sense as the manual of arms will be very similar to your 10/22. You will be limited as to choice in optics, but a forward mounted red dot or scout rifle optic on a see-through rail (long-eye relief, low power magnification) will speed the target acquisition up.

Bonus points, as you said for the wooden stock.

Bolt a pic rail on there for a flash light mount, but leave the flash light off the rail unless imminently required for duty, just for the friendly neighborhood aesthetics Wink
 
Posts: 17461 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
M1 Carbine now on my list. Pro's and cons over a mini-14? Looks like an M1 Carbine has more recoil than a similarly equipped AR-15 though.
 
Posts: 10517 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aeteocles:
M1 Carbine now on my list. Pro's and cons over a mini-14?


Ammunition is generally more expensive (30+% per FMJ round) and harder to get compared to .223/5.56. If we're talking premium defense rounds, it's a wash between the two (about $1 per round for either).

As far as ballistic energy and penetration, the .223/5.56 is going to win.


In terms of logistics, it's going to be easier to find pouches for AR-sized mags than it is for .30 carbine mags. The magazine themselves will be less common though I don't believe it will make that much a difference. Probably be harder to find purpose-built pouches for the M1 Carbine than M1 carbine mags, unless you're willing to go with ye-olde-surplus-bandoleer or something like that.

It will be easier to accessorize the Mini-14, but since you're looking for a basic "farm-ish" rifle that might not be a consideration.
 
Posts: 17461 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
You are making a pretty good argument for the Mini-14.

Reports of large fireballs are a little concerning though.

An accustrut on the front could make it less ugly.

I can even get it cera-coated a pleasant color for the wifey.
 
Posts: 10517 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
Mini14 was the first thing that popped in my head from the thread title.

SU16 doesn't have a bad rep on KTOG. But I've never handled/shot one. IIRC, it uses AR mags. Which could be a plus.

CMR30 could be an option, if 22WMR is an ammo option.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 6325 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Jack of All Trades,
Master of Nothing
Picture of 2000Z-71
posted Hide Post
A little outside the box, an FNAR? .308, 10 round magazine and even a California friendly blue/gray color scheme.

https://fnamerica.com/products...es/fnar-competition/




My daughter can deflate your daughter's soccer ball.
 
Posts: 10443 | Location: Anchorage, AK | Registered: September 12, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aeteocles:
M1 Carbine now on my list. Pro's and cons over a mini-14? Looks like an M1 Carbine has more recoil than a similarly equipped AR-15 though.


Not in my experience. Recoil-wise, it will fall between a 9mm PC Carbine and .223 Mini-14.
 
Posts: 21865 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by craigcpa:
Benelli MR1. Came in a "standard rifle" configuration (had a second configuration with pistol grip, etc.), and was said to be quite comfortable to shoot. No longer made, so you'll have to look at GB.


Don't see any on gunbroker...
 
Posts: 10517 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Other than the Vector, I think any on your list plus the M1 carbine would work. M1 carbine recoil is not an issue and soft point bullets have very good terminal performance in the caliber.

If I were setting a carbine up for my wife, I'd probably just take my M1 carbine, toss on an Ultimak rail, small RDS and single CR123 cell light and let that be hers.




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

The world's a dangerous place, we can help! http://portlandfirearmtraining.com/
 
Posts: 3898 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
So....M1 Carbine. Replica new or military surplus?
 
Posts: 10517 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
We gonna get some
oojima in this house!
Picture of smithnsig
posted Hide Post
Ares SCR. Not wood but uses AR upper and magazines.


-----------------------------------------------------------
TCB all the time...
 
Posts: 5989 | Location: Cantonment/Perdido Key, Florida | Registered: September 28, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I like the M1, and surplus.

Just as thought exercise...., especially low profile long arms in California.
- Lever actions in .223 (Henry and Browning)
- Shotguns. Variety of useful loads including low recoil.


--
No matter where you go, there you are

I always prefer reality when I can figure out what it is.
-- JALLEN 10/18/18
 
Posts: 1712 | Location: Roswell, GA | Registered: March 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
Following the above, Ruger (IIRC) had a 44Mag carbine.
Side load & tube fed, but more discrete than an AR/tactical type.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 6325 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigless in
Indiana
Picture of IndianaBoy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 2000Z-71:
A little outside the box, an FNAR? .308, 10 round magazine and even a California friendly blue/gray color scheme.

https://fnamerica.com/products...es/fnar-competition/


I'd hesitate to hand a 9lb 308 to a 95lb woman.

Either to carry around or to shoot, or both.
 
Posts: 13289 | Location: The Edge of the Ozarks | Registered: December 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigless in
Indiana
Picture of IndianaBoy
posted Hide Post
I think the M1 Carbine would fit the bill nicely.


Especially concerning weight.
 
Posts: 13289 | Location: The Edge of the Ozarks | Registered: December 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
If you go with the M1 Carbine, both Speer Gold Dots and Hornady Critical Defense are available in .30 Carbine.

In addition, if she wants a red dot, you can put an Ultimak rail on the carbine for her. It doesn't require any permanent modifications.

As to surplus vs. new, it depends on your price range. If you only have ~$1000 to spend, you're better off getting a quality surplus carbine off somewhere like the CMP Forums, and replacing all the springs. If you have ~$1700 to spend, get a high-end new production carbine like a Fulton Armory.

Don't bother with cheaper commercial carbines like Auto-Ordnance, Universal, Iver Johnson, etc.

If you can't afford even the $1000 for a quality surplus USGI M1 Carbine, you can get something like a Ruger PC Carbine or Mini-14 for a bit cheaper.
 
Posts: 21865 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Non "Assault Weapon", semiautomatic, magazine fed carbine/rifle for a 95lb girl?

© SIGforum 2019