SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    No Kids, No School Taxes
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
No Kids, No School Taxes Login/Join 
Drill Here, Drill Now
Picture of tatortodd
posted
I think this is an awesome first step. Public schools and teachers unions were long ago taken over by commies (see #s 17, 31, 36, 41), and public schools are not the benefit to society that they were intended.
quote:
California proposal: No kids? Then don't pay school taxes

A California man has proposed a ballot measure to exempt residents who don’t have kids in state public schools from paying the taxes to fund them.

The “California Education Tax Relief Act,” proposed by Lee Olson of Huntington Beach, would allow California residents with no children in the public school system to avoid paying taxes and fees designated for state school funding, KTVU reports.

Last week, the state Attorney General’s Office gave approval for circulation of the initiative, allowing proponents to start collecting the signatures necessary to get a spot on the November 2018 ballot.

The proposal is one of several initiatives that Olson, who lists himself as chairman of the Committee to End Slavery, proposed earlier this year. In 2009, he proposed a measure with the same title, but it failed to qualify for the ballot.

It’s unclear whether the measure might stand a chance of even getting on the ballot this time. If it did, it could meet stiff opposition from parents and others worried such a massive exemption would result in higher taxes elsewhere.

The state’s Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance says the measure could reduce revenue from state and local taxes and fees by tens of billions of dollars a year -- but could lead to increases in other taxes and fees in order for state and local governments to balance their budgets.

In order to qualify for the November 2018 ballot, the school tax initiative needs 585,407 signatures by May 8, 2018, KTVU reports.



Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity

DISCLAIMER: These are the author's own personal views and do not represent the views of the author's employer.
 
Posts: 23255 | Location: Northern Suburbs of Houston | Registered: November 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
I'm in favor!

Of course, the logical extension would be No Kids (in public socialist schools), No School Taxes!
If you send your kid to a private school... you should not have to pay twice. Smile



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24115 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
How about no school, no taxes?




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
I think this is a slippery slope.

Parents alone cannot afford their kids' education (unless I have my number swag wrong). If education of kids goes down, society will suffer. However, if my swag is off and what parents pay is enough providing schools stop paying administrators six figures and burdensome teachers are let go to do it, I'm all in.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14038 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
It's about time
 
Posts: 107587 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
hello darkness
my old friend
Picture of gw3971
posted Hide Post
I agree with this completely. I have no kids. My neighbor has five kids and the exact same home and lot size. We both pay the same school tax despite his dependants occupying five seats in the local school. He should certainly pay more tax than me for this. He gets write offs for his kids on bot the the state and fed taxes for his kids who are consuming the product of public education. I don't mind paying for some public education but he should pay higher taxes for his kids who are consuming the product. If anyone deserves a tax break in the public education realm its us folks without kids.
 
Posts: 7724 | Location: West Jordan, Utah | Registered: June 19, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
The argument has always been that Society as a whole benefits from an educated populace, and I suppose there is merit to that line of thought. However, the state of public "education" has reached a point where the merit is dubious.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27902 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
the state of public "education" has reached a point where the merit is dubious.

Not to mention that you can actually send your kid to a very good private school for less money than most 'public' schools spend per year.

It's all about the cost of legions of 6 figure administrators and YUGE defined benefit retirement plans ...



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24115 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
32nd degree
Picture of roarindan
posted Hide Post
Hey!! shut yer mouth...you stopped paying our salary. don't tell us how to teach now!!!


___________________



"the world doesn't end til yer dead, 'til then there's more beatin's in store, stand it like a man, and give some back"
Al Swearengen
 
Posts: 4586 | Location: East Overshoe, second buckle from the top. | Registered: January 20, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Alienator
Picture of SIG4EVA
posted Hide Post
I am 100% for this. I have no problem paying taxes as long as society as a whole benefits and improves. IE Less dumbasses which makes life better. Unfortunately, the current system allows stupidity to prevail. I am probably private schooling my children anyway.


SIG556 Classic
P220 Carry SAS Gen 2 SAO
SP2022 9mm German Triple Serial
P938 SAS
P365 FDE

Psalm 118:24 "This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it"
 
Posts: 7071 | Location: NC | Registered: March 16, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
That won’t fly when they realize how much money they will miss out on not only from people without kids but people with kids who are no longer in school. Instead of gouging people for their entire lives they will only get them for a much shorter length of time.
 
Posts: 3920 | Registered: January 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
I don't have kids yet.

I think that there should be a baseline school tax for property owners. The baseline covers the benefit the property owner gets from being in a school district (increased property value) and the fact that the property owner has access to the school should he want to (when he does have kids and for other Civic services), and the mutual benefit to society of having an educated populace and partial day care to working adults.

Then, above and beyond the baseline property tax, schools should charge tuition to cover their operating costs. This takes care of people who rent and more kids than others.
 
Posts: 13048 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Instead of gouging people for their entire lives they will only get them for a much shorter length of time.

Let's say your property taxes to the public school are 4,000/year.... and you own your own home from the time you are 30 to the time you are 60....
4,000/year x 30 = $120,000
You paid 120K to send little Johnny to the public school! Eek

Even worse if you live there until you are 70....
4,000/year x 40 = $160,000



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24115 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Essayons
Picture of SapperSteel
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flashguy:
. . . the state of public "education" has reached a point where the merit is dubious.

flashguy


That's because public education has become much less about actually educating and much more about indoctrinating.


Thanks,

Sap
 
Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
I am entirely in favor of this

I have no kids, yet I feel that is 60% of my property taxes are going towards schools I have no use for, I should be able to claim the little bastards that go there as dependents Smile

But seriously, the benefit that society is getting from public schools today is marginal, if not non-existent so I think this is a great first step

Yes, its a slippery slope, but if you want public schools to continue, then make it worth my while to support them. Right now I get zero benefit from schools.

it would also go a long way to reducing the role of government in areas where they have no business being



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 53179 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
quote:
Instead of gouging people for their entire lives they will only get them for a much shorter length of time.

Let's say your property taxes to the public school are 4,000/year.... and you own your own home from the time you are 30 to the time you are 60....
4,000/year x 30 = $120,000
You paid 120K to send little Johnny to the public school! Eek

Even worse if you live there until you are 70....
4,000/year x 40 = $160,000

Exactly why it won’t pass.
 
Posts: 3920 | Registered: January 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Private schools get by with only charging per student per year of classes attended. Public schools charge everyone forever! The amount of waste is staggering. I pay $3,265.90 this year in school taxes, and all of the folks that live near me pay similar. The average cost of private school tuition in my county is $5,698.50 per year. (I averaged the averages of elementary and High school tuitions) We should all be out front of the local public schools with fucking torches and pitchforks demanding to know who has squandered our tax money, but we are so used to getting fucked that we collectively shrug.
 
Posts: 1803 | Location: Spokane, WA | Registered: June 23, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Giftedly Outspoken
Picture of sigarms229
posted Hide Post
I'm in favor of it.



Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six
 
Posts: 4522 | Location: SouthCentral PA | Registered: December 05, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Sailor1911
posted Hide Post
It will cost them more to house the uneducated clowns in the prison system. It's pay me now or pay me later IMO.




Place your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.

“If in winning a race, you lose the respect of your fellow competitors, then you have won nothing” - Paul Elvstrom "The Great Dane" 1928 - 2016
 
Posts: 3762 | Location: Wichita, Kansas | Registered: March 27, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nature is full of
magnificent creatures
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gw3971:
I have no kids. My neighbor has five kids and the exact same home and lot size. We both pay the same school tax despite his dependants occupying five seats in the local school. He should certainly pay more tax than me for this. He gets write offs for his kids on bot the the state and fed taxes for his kids who are consuming the product of public education. I don't mind paying for some public education but he should pay higher taxes for his kids who are consuming the product. If anyone deserves a tax break in the public education realm its us folks without kids.


I agree 100%. If someone wants to have a lot of kids, that is their right. For public education, pay the bill. This will never happen here in Utah, but the Federal code seems about to change.

We home school and get less than 0% cooperation from the local District. They routinely ignore State law, certified letters, etc. Outside the local and State government of NJ, I've seldom met a nastier bunch of folks.

Make those using the services pay for it, or let the District eat cake.
 
Posts: 6273 | Registered: March 24, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    No Kids, No School Taxes

© SIGforum 2024