Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee3b/aee3b521e84432872466158ef4495663b62b9a65" alt="Picture of Expert308 Picture of Expert308"
| I shot many thousands of rounds of .45 ACP 200gr LSWC's back when I was shooting IPSC stuff, all loaded with 231 to major power level. I never had any issues with it. I don't recall what the charge weight was. Unique is good too. IIRC it was quite a bit smokier, but that could have been the lube on the bullets I was using. It was about 35 years ago now. |
| |
Moderator
| I’ve used 231 since the early ‘80s for lighter loads in .45.
__________________
"Owning a handgun doesn't make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician." -Jeff Cooper
|
| |
Staring back from the abyss
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb4c/4fb4c63757556f9801b349ce570881ac9bf5c6f0" alt="Picture of Gustofer Picture of Gustofer"
| Red Dot and Unique here. Both work well enough for me.
________________________________________________________ "Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
|
| |
Member
| Win 231 (equivalent to HP38 in current manuf.) is my go-to for .45 ACP loads. With 200 gr LSWC's, I load 5.0 to 5.2 gr. for 800 fps out of my 1911's and an ancient Smith model 1955 Target. With hard ball, 230's, I up the load to 5.4 - 5.5 gr to match the government military load. Both are superbly accurate in my guns. I don't like Unique (affectionately known as "flaming dirt" by some) in the .45 ACP for it's +- 0.2 gr charge variance with my measures. 231 or HP38 meter exceptionally well. Best regards, Rod
5th Spl Forces, Air Force Bird Dog FAC, lll Corps RVN 69-70.... We enjoy the Bill of Rights by the sacrifices of our veterans; Politicians, Preachers, Educators, Journalists and Community Organizers are beneficiaries, not defenders of our freedoms.
|
| |
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13df5/13df517de896ae63d8de131d2c44db0b057f5c7a" alt="Picture of sourdough44 Picture of sourdough44"
| I like Win-231/Hp-38, use it with various handgun loads. Hodgdon had a fairly recent comparison, calling HP-38 ‘older technology’. I like Titegroup also. https://www.hodgdonreloading.c...ng-powder-efficiency With some reloaders, Titegroup gets disparaged as a potential of a double charge. That can be true with many, it’s also slower on most charts than Bullseye, another older school powder. I try to bridge the gap between old favorites, but willing to try new powders. The last few years, availability factors in heavily. I will say, 4-8 pounds of Titegroup lasts a long time. |
| |