Member
| Just curiosity why would one want the pistol version of a 16.5" barreled gun?
“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
|
| |
That rug really tied the room together.
| quote: Originally posted by hrcjon: Just curiosity why would one want the pistol version of a 16.5" barreled gun?
Well .223 ammo is $600 for a case right now so you can shoot a similar style gun with the same controls for much cheaper.
______________________________________________________ Often times a very small man can cast a very large shadow
|
| Posts: 6708 | Location: Floriduh | Registered: October 16, 2004 |
IP
|
|
Member
| quote: Originally posted by patw: ^^^ Unfortunately, 9mm isn't much cheaper than .223/5.56 now
Not as I see it. Ammoseek.com -- new ammo, any case, eliminate the oddball outlet or two with really low prices. Prices per round for the first page of Ammoseek's search, not including freight: 9mm -- from 20.0 to 23.2 cents per round 223 Remy -- from 42.9 to 52.9 cents per round Of course, these are FMJ rounds. Big price difference to me. |
| Posts: 8073 | Location: Colorado | Registered: January 26, 2008 |
IP
|
|
Fighting the good fight
| Interestingly, the grip is modeled on the M&P grip, and uses interchangeable M&P backstraps. quote: Originally posted by Voshterkoff: Why do companies not use Colt smg magazines?
Because S&W doesn't want to have to license and tool up for a different magazine design when they can just use their own design that they're already producing. And because a certain segment is fixated on the idea of their handguns and PCCs sharing magazines. Plus, with S&W's stated goal of this rifle being to "break barriers for those looking to enter the pistol caliber carbine market", it seems that they're aiming at the budget/cost-conscious crowd, and want to be able to say as a selling point: See, you already have some spare M&P/Glock magazines, so you can save money by not having to buy as many more magazines for this PCC. |
| Posts: 33318 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008 |
IP
|
|
Peace through superior firepower
| quote: Originally posted by DaBigBR: Yawn.
Yes, I think they should have stopped at their Folding Pistol Carbine, which makes sense. The idea is to have a compact rifle which can be stowed in a small space. The FPC fits this role quite nicely. Assuming a shooter has access to 5.56mm ammunition, the only advantage the FPC has is size. If I am going to have a 5.56-sized rifle, it should be in 5.56 or the other calibers AR15-type rifles are being chambered in these days. |
| |
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
| quote: Originally posted by KSGM: I wonder if, considering the name, they're marketing it heavily toward LE. I know my local PD just opted to equip its officers with 9mm carbines. Don't ask me why, but maybe it's a trend in LE.
That's interesting, and not a trend I've witnessed here. Do you know if they're rolling them out to everybody or is it limited to certain roles? I know of a few MPXs and MP5s issued locally for specialized details, but patrol is pretty much universally 5.56, which I much prefer. |
| Posts: 9470 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006 |
IP
|
|
Member
| I am betting Smith will get a piece of the three gun and Steel Challenge market also with this introduction.
There are not a lot of options between the $600.00 Ruger 9mm carbine vs. the JP Enterprises GMR15 or the JP15 that start at $1800 and go up to $3500 - each (ouch) unless you build your own (like I did with parts from Palmetto State Armory).
Once the dust settles I will have to handle one to see how it feels since I shoot about 300-500 rounds a month thru my PCC 9mm AR |
| |