SIGforum
Qmaxx Black Diamond opinions

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/630601935/m/9590059354

February 26, 2019, 03:28 PM
Klusk2
Qmaxx Black Diamond opinions
https://www.qmaxxproducts.com/product/black-diamond/

I recently purchased a bottle of this all-in-one product for my Ar. Our range guys swear by this, but I was wondering if anyone else is using this and what you thought of it.


The Working Police.....
"We the willing, led by the unknown, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful."
February 26, 2019, 07:11 PM
DSgrouse
call or email the company and get an MSDS sheet. That will tell you most everything you need to know.

https://qmaxxproducts.wpengine...GHS-SDS.04.15.17.pdf

quote:
3. COMPOSITION / INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Chemical name CAS No. Concentration
4-Chlorotrifluorotoluene 98-56-6 30-60%
Kerosene 8008-20-6 10-30%
Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated heavy
naphthenic
64742-52-5 10-30%
Calcium Sulfonate 61789-86-4 1-10%
Corrosion Inhibitor Mixture 1-10%
The exact percentage (concentration) of composition has been withheld as a trade secret.


quote:
Appearance: Opaque black liquid
Odor: Solvent
Odor threshold: Not determined pH: Not applicable
Melting point/freezing point: Not determined Boiling point/range: Not determined
Flash point: > 43°C / > 109°F cc Evaporation rate: Not determined
Flammability (solid, gas): Not applicable
Flammable limits: LEL: 0.9 % UEL: 10.5 %
Vapor pressure: Not determined Vapor density: >1 (air=1)
Relative density: 1.022 Solubility(ies): Insoluble in water
Partition coefficient: n-octanol/water: Not
determined
Auto-ignition temperature: Not determined
Decomposition temperature: Not determined Viscosity: Not determined
VOC content (%): 19.74%
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Reactivity: Not normally reactive.
Chemical stability: This product is stable under normal storage conditions
Possibility of hazardous reactions: None known.
Conditions to avoid: All sources of ignition, welding arcs, and open flames.
Incompatible materials: Strong oxidizers, acids and bases.
Hazardous decomposition products: May produce chlorine and fluorine containing gases.

February 26, 2019, 07:58 PM
Black Pepper
Looking at that OSHA safety data sheet makes me say "NOPE!"
February 26, 2019, 08:10 PM
fritz
quote:
Originally posted by Klusk2:
Our range guys swear by this..

Many gun owners swear by a variety of lubricants that are made by a variety of manufacturers, used in a variety of firearms.

Even the lightest and most volatile lubes work quite well in ARs, as long as they are re-applied with the necessary frequency. The stickier & heavier lubes require less frequent application, as they take longer to burn off.

Survey 100 random AR users, and there could be 30 or 50 or 70 different favorite lubes mentioned, and I suspect all of those users will swear their lube is the greatest thing since the invention of the AR itself.
February 26, 2019, 08:19 PM
sigfreund
The simple fact is that just like defensive handgun ammunition, almost no one really knows what the best, or even a superior lubricant is. Without extensive testing involving a large sampling of the countless lubricants and long term experimentation coupled with precise measurements and analysis, it’s always going to boil down to, “Well, the gun still works and no parts have fallen off yet.”

No individual owner will ever have the valid information to attest to much more than that.




6.4/93.6

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.”
— Plato