SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Mason-Howe Rifle Room    870 Super Magnum?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
870 Super Magnum? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted
From the "I don't need it but kinda want it" department:

Last week I cruised one of the pawn shops nearby and saw an 870 Super Magnum on the rack for a really good price. Tempted as heck to buy it, but I have to admit I don't really know what the "Super Magnum" designation tells me.

It's relatively new (plastic trigger guard), and pretty clean (it could use a good scrub, still). Long barrel, choke tube included (turkey choke, maybe?).

Mostly, I want it for the receiver, planning a build of a different sort. I may sell off the barrel, choke, stock, and forend. But I'm still way curious what the Super Magnum thing is all about. Help me out?


- - - - -

Edited to correct bad spelling.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: vthoky,




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 15964 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
It means it can handle 3.5" shells (provided it has a 3.5" Super Magnum barrel on it and it hasn't been swapped for a 3" or 2.75" chambered barrel).

Standard = 2.75" shells only
Magnum = 2.75" and 3" shells
Super Magnum = 2.75", 3", and 3.5" shells
 
Posts: 35189 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
" That was easy." Smile

Thank you, Rogue.




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 15964 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sourdough44
posted Hide Post
If the 3.5” accommodation adds weight or bulk(likely) that would be a slight negative to me. One can get to max performance, if needed, by getting the best of the 3” ammo.

I think earlier with the non-toxic waterfowl ammo requirements, steel shot was common. With that, 3.5” steel was often used, hence the chamber.

Of course top performing ammo costs more, but it’s an option. In the earlier years, Hevi-shot & Remington HD rated rather well.

If looking more for a home-defense role, the 2 3/4’ will most often get R done.

Of course if one doesn’t mind a few more ounces or bulk, no biggie. The ‘good price’ is nice. The best time to buy used guns is often mid Winter, after the Christmas season.
 
Posts: 7386 | Location: WI | Registered: February 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
To handle the 3.5" shells, is the receiver actually longer than that of a Magnum or a standard? Or is it simply a matter of the internals being different?




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 15964 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yeah, that M14 video guy...
Picture of benny6
posted Hide Post
It has a larger ejection port, a re-designed bolt and different action bars. The external dimensions are the same as a standard Remington 870. From what I've read, the only real situation where you can benefit from a super-mag is if you're trying to hunt high flying geese.

All ground-dwelling prey (winged, 2-legged and 4-legged) can be easily taken with a 2-3/4" or 3" magnum shotshell.

Tony.


Owner, TonyBen, LLC, Type-07 FFL
www.tonybenm14.com (Site under construction).
e-mail: tonyben@tonybenm14.com
 
Posts: 5961 | Location: Auburndale, FL | Registered: February 13, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
Thank you, Tony.

If it'll reliably throw out 2.75" and 3" empties, I'll be okay with that. Smile




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 15964 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have had a 870 Super Magnum for several years.

Never had a problem throwing 2.75” or 3” hulls.
 
Posts: 1375 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 20, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Delta-3
posted Hide Post
If your planning on using it as is (sounds like your not) but if so I hope you like recoil because an 870 in 3.5" is pretty severe.


Rom 13:4 If you do evil, be afraid. For he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.
 
Posts: 781 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: September 30, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
I won't be using any 3.5s, for sure, though I do appreciate the warning.




Politicians seem to have forgotten that they work for us, not the other way around.
— — — — — — — — — — — —
God bless America.
 
Posts: 15964 | Location: VA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Mason-Howe Rifle Room    870 Super Magnum?

© SIGforum 2026