Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Looking at building up some good self defense ammo for my 5.56 rifles. Everyone suggest hornady tap but I can get more Speer gold soft point for the money. Any reason to not just get the Speer gold dot? | ||
|
fugitive from reality |
They are both excellent rounds. The tactical crowd tends to fan boy a bit over what the military is currently using, but Gold Dot is used by a lot of police departments. The question is are you looking for barrier penetration or soft targer performance? _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
I would say soft target. But any clue on how the Speer does on barriers? | |||
|
Freethinker |
What specific load(s) are you considering? The Hornady 55 grain TAP I’m familiar with is a fast expanding design that may not penetrate deeply, and especially not through barriers. It’s specifically recommended for use when overpenetration is a concern. On the other hand, the 5.56 53 grain GMX with a solid copper hollow point bullet penetrates very well. A couple of links: https://www.hornadyle.com/rifl...n/55-gr-tap-urban#!/ https://www.hornadyle.com/rifl...x-tap-patrol-nato#!/ In my personal testing of various 223 loads some years ago, the 64 grain (now 62 gn.) Speer Gold Dot penetrated barriers better than loads like the 5.56 M193 or M855. It’s what I settled on for issuing to my agency’s officers. https://le.vistaoutdoor.com/wo...load_comparison.aspx ► 6.4/93.6 | |||
|
Member |
On the tap I was not sure but on the Speer the 75 grain soft point. | |||
|
Freethinker |
Link for the Speer ballistics for the 75 grain GD: https://le.vistaoutdoor.com/wo...load_comparison.aspx ► 6.4/93.6 | |||
|
Member |
Thank you. I did look and the 64 seem to hold up better vs barriers. It looks like the 64gr has been discontinued. | |||
|
Freethinker |
Yes, I haven’t seen the 64 grain Gold Dot in quite some time. I assume the weight was changed to 62 grains so it was the same as M855 and therefore less confusing to some users. I would expect it to perform virtually the same as the 64. In my testing I actually saw a little higher velocity for the 64 grain version than what Speer claims for the 62, about 50 fps. ► 6.4/93.6 | |||
|
Member |
My understanding is also that the 64 grain Gold Dot is gone. Our agency has converted to 62 grain. We have not noticed a shift in zero at a level the average shooter can perceive. I have an LPVO gun zeroed for it and cannot tell the difference. | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
If you are planning on engaging auto glass or sheet metal you don't want a soft point round. A bonded FMJ or open tip match round is going to give better performance in those situations. For personal defence an expanding hollow point or soft tip is a better choice. _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
Any suggestions? My budget is around 600.00 | |||
|
Member |
Speer Gold Dot. Tap is crap. ----------------------------- Always carry. Never tell. | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
Since they're both good rounds I'd go with whatever is cheaper. You really can't go wrong with either one. _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
BoneFrog has 55, 62, 64, 75gr: https://www.bonefroggunclub.co...speer?sort_by=manual "No matter where you go - there you are" | |||
|
Freethinker |
Based on my personal testing, I must disagree. I am not familiar with any bonded FMJ bullets, but I have tested M193 (55 grain) and M855 (62 grain) bullets through a 1976 pickup windshield as well as a couple of 75 grain open tip bullets, the Hornady TAP and FPD, and compared them with the 64 grain Gold Dot soft point. With the exception of the Gold Dots, all the bullets broke up and penetrated only a very limited distance into my test medium (water soaked newsprint). The test pack was about 8 inches thick and a piece of card stock (manila folder card) was placed at the front of the pack which was positioned on the vehicle seat about where the driver or passenger would normally sit. The two Gold Dot bullets did not show signs of tumbling or significant breakup before encountering the test media pack. One bullet perforated the pack entirely and broke out the rear window of the pickup cab. The other bullet (pictured below) penetrated all the way through the newsprint and was stopped by a layer of duct tape holding the pack together. Hornady 75 grain open tip law enforcement TAP. I had a chance to see this same load fired into calibrated test gelatin through laminated automotive glass and although I didn’t record the precise results (and unfortunately had no camera with me), I did note at the time that it broke up and performed poorly. Hornady 75 grain open tip “For Personal Defense” M855 (62 grain FMJ “green tip”) M193 (55 grain FMJ) Speer 64 grain Gold Dot soft point. The small holes to the side were probably made by glass fragments, but the bullet could have lost some of its material based on how it was deformed by the glass before it passed through the witness card. The one recovered 64 grain Gold Dot bullet found against the tape at the back of the media pack. (The unfired FMJ bullet is just for scale.) The recovered bullet retained 29 grains of the original 64. The number of samples of shots of each type of bullet was obviously very limited, but I believe the above results have some informational value. I have fired the same bullets into other test packs without going through barrier material, and the results were generally consistent with the above. I believe that for maximum penetration with today’s bullets, a solid copper alloy slug would be best, and that seems to be borne out by manufacturers’ gelatin test data. ► 6.4/93.6 | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
Below is some testing done by Dr. Gary Roberts. His data shows that the tested bonded rounds retained more weight than similar non bonded rounds when fired through barriers. I'm not saying your data is wrong, but mine might not be current with today's bullets. https://www.ar15.com/ammo/proj...Barrier%20Rounds.htm This the entire AR-15.com section on ballistic testing for both rifle and pistol rounds. https://www.ar15.com/ammo/proj..._FAQ/#mozTocId778915 _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Freethinker |
No doubt. I am sure that's why the Gold Dots I tested did so much better than the nonbonded bullets. ► 6.4/93.6 | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
I didn't realize some of your rounds were bonded. My bad. _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
Didn't somebody say not long ago that BoneFrog is only selling to LEOs now? I've got some 64gr GDSP at home and I'd like to stock up on some more while I can still get it. | |||
|
Member |
Go with the Gold Dot. Everyone I talked to swears by them. The fbi seems to like the Gold Dots as well. The fbi Ballistic guys are probably the best at what they do (unlike the other 90%). ______________________________________________________________________ "When its time to shoot, shoot. Dont talk!" “What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It’s not good at much else.” —Author Tom Clancy | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |