With bad intent
| Meh.
________________________________
|
| Posts: 7942 | Location: One step ahead of you | Registered: February 10, 2009 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Edit or Delete Message Edit or Delete Message"
IP
|
|
Member
| If you read the official NRA / SA, Inc advertising circular (formerly known as the magazine American Rifleman) you can find out how SA, Inc has revolutionized rifles by inventing from scratch this lightweight, magazine fed, gas operated, air cooled, shoulder fired weapon. It uses space age aluminum and polymer components and an innovative 5.56mm cartridge the likes of which have never been seen. Offering this modern wonder as a pistol version is even that much more mindblowing, I mean how do these guys continually amaze with their innovation?
Smart assery off, as said above you can do better or at least the same for less. There is nothing different about the saint other than the SA Inc hype. Ask any Illinois gun dealer or owner their opinion before you buy for a more detailed review. |
| |
Member
| They were listed as crap, but they hope peeps will forget same... |
| |
Sigless in Indiana
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75923/75923e59f41fee21de072f1d98c37de9ef663f19" alt="Picture of IndianaBoy Picture of IndianaBoy"
| Personally I wouldn't go shorter than 10.3 with an AR pistol in 223/5.56
Velocity falls way off and muzzle blast goes way up.
I went with an 11.5 on my pistol build. Probably would have been just as happy with a 10.3. It gets shot with a can in place 99% of the time.
I don't even know what the Saint pistol is retailing for, but it is probably too much. |
| |
Sigless in Indiana
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75923/75923e59f41fee21de072f1d98c37de9ef663f19" alt="Picture of IndianaBoy Picture of IndianaBoy"
| |
| |
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79c8d/79c8d8ccf51dd231e3f81a729f27cdf48ce2a13b" alt="Picture of powermad Picture of powermad"
| |
| Posts: 1584 | Location: Portland Oregon | Registered: October 01, 2011 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Edit or Delete Message Edit or Delete Message"
IP
|
|
I Am The Walrus
| Does it have grip zone and are there women in yoga pants firing it in commercials?
_____________
|
| |
Fighting the good fight
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2831/d2831416b94b80207ff1ff49d2660936130ab01d" alt="Picture of RogueJSK Picture of RogueJSK"
| quote: Originally posted by powermad: When I buy a lower they ask if it's for a pistol or rifle. It's not registered here, just the normal FFL transfer. But it is sold as either a pistol or rifle lower and not marked as such. Same thing though, once bought as a "pistol" it's always a pistol even though it's not marked.
Unless Oregon has some funky law requiring that, your FFL is doing it wrong. Per the ATF, AR lower receivers should be recorded and transferred by your FFL as an "Other Firearm (frame, receiver, etc.)" on the 4473. They are neither a pistol nor a long gun, and there is no federal requirement to declare an intention to build it as one or the other at the time of purchase/transfer. |
| Posts: 33685 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b9/d89b9ce2c023e33f574f4f7b7a9d9d26f6444e92" alt="Edit or Delete Message Edit or Delete Message"
IP
|
|