Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Ok, who is running a pdw stock on their builds? What is your opinion? Likes? Dislikes? Thanks | ||
|
Cat Whisperer |
I'm interested as well, I have trouble stomaching the price though. ------------------------------------ 135 ├┼┼╕ 246R | |||
|
Member |
Likes: the only advantage is OAL Dislikes: be careful what your buying, as the sub $300 models are not true PDW stocks. The older designs don't have a cheek weld, which is annoying ! And what's been said, price tag !! | |||
|
Idiot by birth, Asshole by choice |
I don't, but a friend of mine runs two of the Mawim PDW stocks with the JP captured springs. They work well, it seems, and he likes them. I went the other route, and used the Law Gen3 folder on my 7.5, and I actually prefer the Law to the Maxin type stocks, as you can fold down to 18 inches, with a 7.5 barrel. The Maxim collapses to about 26 inches, with the 7.5 barrel. Edit, they function fine, but he's using some pretty high end parts. I wouldn't want to use one on a budget build with cheap parts, as the function may not be guaranteed.... But then, what is a guarantee lol. | |||
|
Member |
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I've never tried "running" a stock on a rifle. I've used a great many, however. "If you think everything's going to be alright, you don't understand the problem!"- Gutpile Charlie "A man's got to know his limitations" - Harry Callahan | |||
|
...and now here's Al with the Weather. |
Alternative is the LWRC Ultra Compact stock. A buttstock sized to a pistol length buffer tube. Uses a flatwire spring and a proprietary buffer. I have one on my SBR, normal stockweld. I am 6'2", maxed out the stock fits fine collapsed the stock is 1 1\2" shorter than a carbine length buffer tube collapsed. MSRP $131 Link ___________________________________________________ But then of course I might be a 13 year old girl who reads alot of gun magazines, so feel free to disregard anything I post. | |||
|
Member |
Don't have one but handled one at aim surplus. The rifle was heavy and the center of balance was off. I didn't like it | |||
|
Member |
I have the MVB ARC collapsible stock on a pdw AR with 8" bbl. I haven't fired it yet so I can't comment on the usability. : / It is very compact and well built, but it is a PITA to break down and pull out the bolt if needed. I don't think I would put this on a weapon that was going to be used for anything more than bugout or truck gun. | |||
|
Member |
gosh your joke is even more funny in this thread than it was in my thread a few months back. | |||
|
Member |
mine | |||
|
Member |
Sexy | |||
|
Busier than a cat covering crap on a marble floor |
I prefer the LAW Tactical folder/adapter. Use any butt stock you like. ________________________________________________________ The trouble with trouble is; it always starts out as fun. | |||
|
Biochemical Superfreak |
I've used the LWRC PDW, the Troy PDW and and a Maxim Defense CQB. All functioned fine, although I swapped for a heavybuffers.com buffer immediately on the LWRC. The Troy had way too much play in it for me when extended, so I sold it and switched to the Maxim Defense. The Maxim has better cheek weld, solid lock up (compared to the Troy), can be extended with one hand, and I like the JP captured buffers when shooting suppressed. Plus, the Maxim breaks down like a normal rifle. The Troy uses a bolt/buffer combo and you have to push both pins and slide the upper forward to remove it. I use the Maxim on an SBRed lower with both 9mm and .300 BLK (and have both JP captured buffers) - no reliability issues shooting suppressed or unsuppressed. However, the Maxim stocks with JP buffers are ridiculously expensive. The LWRC has a much better feel than the Maxim and is less expensive, but is larger overall. If you need a short stock and are on a budget I'd go LWRC. 115 + 115 = 230 | |||
|
hello darkness my old friend |
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |